Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Man, hard one to pick.   I have grandchildren at both schools.   LCM has a decent offense,  defense showed to be lacking against a very good HF team.   OF has an excellent offensive team and appears to be tough on defense.  They beat BC and BC was picked to win the district with all their HYPE. (Go Tigers)  OF beat Woodville 20-6, LCM beat Woodville 21-6.   I pick LCM 24-23.   Only because LCM has home field advantage. 😊

Posted

With Granger sidelined, offense and defense are gonna have to step it up for a few weeks. IMO, they’ve already been grinding playing both sides of the ball. But hey, there’s always an excuse when things don’t go your way. Still… I like our chances. Regardless, the Bobcats will bark per usual.

27-17 Bobcats.

Posted

Our offense has been bad and extremely predictable, we are extremely lucky to be 3-0, thanks to Woodville mistakes & BC special teams, if we don’t figure out how to consistently move the ball we won’t win this game & may lose more. Really hope we can figure it out.

Posted
3 hours ago, LCM 83 said:

Man, hard one to pick.   I have grandchildren at both schools.   LCM has a decent offense,  defense showed to be lacking against a very good HF team.   OF has an excellent offensive team and appears to be tough on defense.  They beat BC and BC was picked to win the district with all their HYPE. (Go Tigers)  OF beat Woodville 20-6, LCM beat Woodville 21-6.   I pick LCM 24-23.   Only because LCM has home field advantage. 😊

Serious question, what has OF shown on offense to say they’re “excellent” on offense?

Posted
1 hour ago, setxathlete14 said:

I dont wanna hear any complaints. All we heard for the longest was about how they needed to get out of slot t

Its crazy how people think changing schemes is an automatic fix for some issues.

Slot T is a great offense, can be very efficient if ran correctly same as all offenses. Imo slot t isnt as athlete demanding as others. Athletic lineman are a big help but can make it work without them.

it definitely changed how its ran when they changed the cut block rules though. Forgot orangefield doesnt run the T anymore. Think that favors lcm match up wise… so ima swap my projection to 21-7 LCM

Posted
1 hour ago, Arch for MVP said:

Its crazy how people think changing schemes is an automatic fix for some issues.

Slot T is a great offense, can be very efficient if ran correctly same as all offenses. Imo slot t isnt as athlete demanding as others. Athletic lineman are a big help but can make it work without them.

it definitely changed how its ran when they changed the cut block rules though. Forgot orangefield doesnt run the T anymore. Think that favors lcm match up wise… so ima swap my projection to 21-7 LCM

No Slot -T talk around here in Orangefield. 
 

18 points was not gifted to them. They crossed the endzone & put it through the uprights. 
 

BC scored a TD on a defensive mistake by running up the middle & the LB falling down if we are using your logic. 
 

28-13 Orangefield 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bobcat101 said:

No Slot -T talk around here in Orangefield. 
 

18 points was not gifted to them. They crossed the endzone & put it through the uprights. 
 

BC scored a TD on a defensive mistake by running up the middle & the LB falling down if we are using your logic. 
 

28-13 Orangefield 

 

Hope you’re right, but offensively we’ve looked stagnant in every game and scrimmage but one (HJ) we will really have to clean it up to score 28 this week, but my fingers are crossed 🤞 

Posted
1 hour ago, Bobcats0809 said:

Hope you’re right, but offensively we’ve looked stagnant in every game and scrimmage but one (HJ) we will really have to clean it up to score 28 this week, but my fingers are crossed 🤞 

Every game Orangefield has played could have been way more offensive if take away the I’d say 10 dropped passes or miss throws with receivers wide open  per game. But that’s HS for you. 
 

The only reason I say this is because Orangefield has brought all its receivers back and the way they performed vs Franklin. I had my expectations set higher. 

Posted
32 minutes ago, Bobcat101 said:

Every game Orangefield has played could have been way more offensive if take away the I’d say 10 dropped passes or miss throws with receivers wide open  per game. But that’s HS for you. 
 

The only reason I say this is because Orangefield has brought all its receivers back and the way they performed vs Franklin. I had my expectations set higher. 

At lcm and WB breauxs system relied heavily om qb running game.... From what ive gathered the qb now doesn't run much? 

Posted
2 hours ago, Bobcat101 said:

No Slot -T talk around here in Orangefield. 
 

18 points was not gifted to them. They crossed the endzone & put it through the uprights. 
 

BC scored a TD on a defensive mistake by running up the middle & the LB falling down if we are using your logic. 
 

28-13 Orangefield 

 

What logic? I never said anything about previous games, or results? Not sure where i said BC gifted yall the game, i didnt even care to watch it. Hence me not knowing the T is no longer yalls offensive system.

I hope orangefield does win, but according to other peoples comments orangefield is having offensive trouble, and i imagine LCM can match up on the outside to make the WRs make contested catches, which ive read catching is a problem for OF? 
If OF catches the ball itll be a good game. If they dont, lcm will win.

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Arch for MVP said:

What logic? I never said anything about previous games, or results? Not sure where i said BC gifted yall the game, i didnt even care to watch it. Hence me not knowing the T is no longer yalls offensive system.

I hope orangefield does win, but according to other peoples comments orangefield is having offensive trouble, and i imagine LCM can match up on the outside to make the WRs make contested catches, which ive read catching is a problem for OF? 
If OF catches the ball itll be a good game. If they dont, lcm will win.

 

Everything you said is spot on. 
 

8 hours ago, Bear Down00 said:

BC gifted OF all 18 of their pts. Held them to under 200 total yds. 

Bears are deeper and just better. LCM big in this one! 27-7

This is were my comment came from about BC “gifting” the game. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Bobcat101 said:

Everything you said is spot on. 
 

This is were my comment came from about BC “gifting” the game. 

Ahh roger. Little mix up then. I was scratching my head thinking when and where i said that 😂

Pulling for OF, hope yall pull it off

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JeffGreen88
    Newest Member
    JeffGreen88
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...