Honest Question

[baddog]

1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

I sure hope so. This jaywalking level crap is embarrassing for us conservatives. Hopefully there will be something relevant with some teeth. 

The only thing I will say on the subject is this. Crooked Comey is nonchalantly walking down the beach with his phone. He sees these mysteriously arranged seashells and thinks them photo worthy, so much so that he posts them on the internet……all the while innocent of their meaning. I simply don’t believe that and neither does anyone who wants to defend it. As many threats and assassination attempts Trump has dealt with, I fail to see the humor or innocence.

[TheMissingBand]

1 hour ago, baddog said:

The only thing I will say on the subject is this. Crooked Comey is nonchalantly walking down the beach with his phone. He sees these mysteriously arranged seashells and thinks them photo worthy, so much so that he posts them on the internet……all the while innocent of their meaning. I simply don’t believe that and neither does anyone who wants to defend it. As many threats and assassination attempts Trump has dealt with, I fail to see the humor or innocence.

What’s the matter? I didn’t think you were one of those snowflakes that gets upset by “mean tweets?”  
 

I’m embarrassed by the way some people are behaving.  

[baddog]

.

[TheMissingBand]

5 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

Technically that’s incorrect. I believe a lesser degree of “sexual abuse” was the verdict according to the AP 5/9/23. 
 

Martha Stewart is a felon. Pretty harmless person. Mark Wahlberg is a felon. Kinda of a great guy though. Malcolm X, yep, a felon. Not my guy, but millions love him too. There’s a whole laundry list. 

Any of them got 34 felonies on ‘em?

[Reagan]

 

Kinda figured there was more evidence against Comey!

[SmashMouth]

On 5/1/2026 at 9:22 PM, TheMissingBand said:

Any of them got 34 felonies on ‘em?

 

On 5/1/2026 at 7:29 PM, baddog said:

The only thing I will say on the subject is this. Crooked Comey is nonchalantly walking down the beach with his phone. He sees these mysteriously arranged seashells and thinks them photo worthy, so much so that he posts them on the internet……all the while innocent of their meaning. I simply don’t believe that and neither does anyone who wants to defend it. As many threats and assassination attempts Trump has dealt with, I fail to see the humor or innocence.

 

On 5/1/2026 at 9:22 PM, TheMissingBand said:

Any of them got 34 felonies on ‘em?

Not that I’m aware of. Trump’s an overachiever though. Gotta give him that. Lol. 

[TheMissingBand]

On 5/1/2026 at 4:00 PM, SmashMouth said:

Technically that’s incorrect. I believe a lesser degree of “sexual abuse” was the verdict according to the AP 5/9/23. 
 

Martha Stewart is a felon. Pretty harmless person. Mark Wahlberg is a felon. Kinda of a great guy though. Malcolm X, yep, a felon. Not my guy, but millions love him too. There’s a whole laundry list. 

No, sir…. Immediately after the judgment, Trump sued his victim for defamation for stating that Trump raped her. The judge quickly threw Trumps case out, saying that Trump had, in fact, raped e Jean Carroll. 
 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[SmashMouth]

5 hours ago, TheMissingBand said:

No, sir…. Immediately after the judgment, Trump sued his victim for defamation for stating that Trump raped her. The judge quickly threw Trumps case out, saying that Trump had, in fact, raped e Jean Carroll. 
 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Incorrect my esteemed feathered friend. You’re refuting my point that Trump was convicted of sexual abuse. That’s what he was convicted of. Not rape. The judge’s points in a tethered defamation case have no bearing on the actual criminal conviction. If we are going to speak facts, then let’s do it. 

[Reagan]

56 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Incorrect my esteemed feathered friend. You’re refuting my point that Trump was convicted of sexual abuse. That’s what he was convicted of. Not rape. The judge’s points in a tethered defamation case have no bearing on the actual criminal conviction. If we are going to speak facts, then let’s do it. 

Facts tend to bore CB!

[TheMissingBand]

9 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

Incorrect my esteemed feathered friend. You’re refuting my point that Trump was convicted of sexual abuse. That’s what he was convicted of. Not rape. The judge’s points in a tethered defamation case have no bearing on the actual criminal conviction. If we are going to speak facts, then let’s do it. 

There was no criminal conviction.  But the jury found that he raped her. 
 

Trump said “I didn’t rape her” after the jury’s decision and lost millions of dollars in the defamation case.  
 

Just admit that being a rapist isn’t a deal breaker for you… you’ll be defending his against being a pedophile once he’s found to have done that, too. 

[SmashMouth]

36 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

There was no criminal conviction.  But the jury found that he raped her. 
 

Trump said “I didn’t rape her” after the jury’s decision and lost millions of dollars in the defamation case.  
 

Just admit that being a rapist isn’t a deal breaker for you… you’ll be defending his against being a pedophile once he’s found to have done that, too. 

Oh, it's definitely not a deal breaker for me. Give me a pedophile conviction, a rape conviction - then we'll talk. It's messy, but you can't get around those pesky laws, due process and all that other constitutional Bill of Rights mumbo jumbo...

[TheMissingBand]

15 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Oh, it's definitely not a deal breaker for me. Give me a pedophile conviction, a rape conviction - then we'll talk. It's messy, but you can't get around those pesky laws, due process and all that other constitutional Bill of Rights mumbo jumbo...

Hypothetically….If the victim had been kin to you… still not a deal breaker?

[SmashMouth]

1 hour ago, TheMissingBand said:

Hypothetically….If the victim had been kin to you… still not a deal breaker?

Well that's a different story. Kinda depends on the relative. If they were real close to me or underage at the time, the deal might go down differently, but all things being equal, here's what my generic starter deal might be:

I would get with the relative, extort Trump for a 7 figure payoff and maybe a spot in his cabinet, split the money with the relative - not sure what the split would be - and then vote for Trump. If it was a "no deal" for him, I would probably get all the facts together, write a book for a shuck ton of money and try to get him to sign the book - maybe 2 or 3 copies. Keep one copy, sell one copy for another sizeable amount of cash and keep one hidden that my grandkids can sell somewhere down the road after I've passed. I would release the book after I voted for Trump. Stop by the publisher on my way home from the Volunteer Fire Station polls in Lumberton.

If the victim were my brother (this is all hypothetical), I would laugh my a$$ off and tell all our friends. Then go vote for Trump.

[SmashMouth]

Always wondered why she didn't go public with the claims until Trump became a politician nearly 24 years later...

[baddog]

4 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Always wondered why she didn't go public with the claims until Trump became a politician nearly 24 years later...

…..and that always seems to be the case. My wife would castrate the guy on the spot. Lol. Actually, she wouldn’t just let anybody get away with a sexual attack, and it wouldn’t take years for an arrest or accusation.

[Reagan]

1 hour ago, baddog said:

…..and that always seems to be the case. My wife would castrate the guy on the spot. Lol. Actually, she wouldn’t just let anybody get away with a sexual attack, and it wouldn’t take years for an arrest or accusation.

This is always the telling factor that it’s a lie when they come out of the woodwork 30 years later.  What happened to the statute of limitations?!

[Reagan]

 

 

[TheMissingBand]

3 hours ago, baddog said:

…..and that always seems to be the case. My wife would castrate the guy on the spot. Lol. Actually, she wouldn’t just let anybody get away with a sexual attack, and it wouldn’t take years for an arrest or accusation.

I mean… I remember when Rs in the House were holding auditions for former flings of Bill Clinton back in the day.  None of yall were worried about timelines back then. 

[TheMissingBand]

3 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

Well that's a different story. Kinda depends on the relative. If they were real close to me or underage at the time, the deal might go down differently, but all things being equal, here's what my generic starter deal might be:

I would get with the relative, extort Trump for a 7 figure payoff and maybe a spot in his cabinet, split the money with the relative - not sure what the split would be - and then vote for Trump. If it was a "no deal" for him, I would probably get all the facts together, write a book for a shuck ton of money and try to get him to sign the book - maybe 2 or 3 copies. Keep one copy, sell one copy for another sizeable amount of cash and keep one hidden that my grandkids can sell somewhere down the road after I've passed. I would release the book after I voted for Trump. Stop by the publisher on my way home from the Volunteer Fire Station polls in Lumberton.

If the victim were my brother (this is all hypothetical), I would laugh my a$$ off and tell all our friends. Then go vote for Trump.

And that, my friend, proves once and for all that you aren’t opposed to pedophilia, as long as the guy raping the kid is Trump. 

[baddog]

13 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

I mean… I remember when Rs in the House were holding auditions for former flings of Bill Clinton back in the day.  None of yall were worried about timelines back then. 

Is that a but but????? Was this board functional during Clinton years? No. Clinton has been dirty for years and “Y’all” never said anything.

[TheMissingBand]

Just now, baddog said:

Is that a but but????? Was this board functional during Clinton years? No. Clinton has been dirty for years and “Y’all” never said anything.

Clinton had relations with consenting adults. Trump rapes women.  It’s a totally different scenario.  

[thetragichippy]

26 minutes ago, baddog said:

Is that a but but????? Was this board functional during Clinton years? No. Clinton has been dirty for years and “Y’all” never said anything.

Why feed the troll. ?

[SmashMouth]

42 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

And that, my friend, proves once and for all that you aren’t opposed to pedophilia, as long as the guy raping the kid is Trump. 

Not true:

First of all, pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult (or even an older adolescent) experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. For girls that's generally 10 to 12 - boys a little older...

I don't know even any leftists that are accusing Trump of a pre-pubescent relationship. I think that was Biden's bag, and for the record, I would not even defend my own son if here were proven to be a pedophile.

Secondly, all my comment really proves is that I enjoy stirring the pot and jerking the chain of the members of TDS who can't help taking the bait every time.

Show me credible evidence of Trump being a pedophile.