Iran War Update

[baddog]

6 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Obama was president what, almost 15 years ago? The relevance is ???

Thanks for the math lesson. Relevance? The hypocrisy. Never heard a peep back then. Always the fake outrage.

[Boyz N Da Hood]

13 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Obama was president what, almost 15 years ago? The relevance is ???

Its their only go to.. but but but 😂

Its easy to see a conservative from a MAGA these days.. 

[Slim Charles]

24 minutes ago, Porter said:

The definition of faction is a small organized group. 😂

They are just buying time and the more time they get the more it bolds well for them. 
 

No doubt it looks good for Trump to give them 30 chances but this is turning into a dumpster fire.

So exactly what is your argument or point here? That there is no one within Iranian leadership who want a deal and for this to end? You believe Iran is completely unified in it's stance against a deal and they all want war? The entire Iranian leadership is made up of factions, including the IRGC. And you think they are all on the same page? 

[baddog]

21 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

Its their only go to.. but but but 😂

Its easy to see a conservative from a MAGA these days.. 

You’re not even man enough to quote me? Democrats are easily spotted. Pretty much back fighters.

[thetragichippy]

40 minutes ago, Slim Charles said:

So exactly what is your argument or point here? That there is no one within Iranian leadership who want a deal and for this to end? You believe Iran is completely unified in it's stance against a deal and they all want war? The entire Iranian leadership is made up of factions, including the IRGC. And you think they are all on the same page? 

I'd be curious of the argument as well. 

When a leader can't travel one one location to another, I would say there are some issues

[baddog]

7 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

I'd be curious of the argument as well. 

When a leader can't travel one one location to another, I would say there are some issues

They drew straws to get their newest leader.

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, OlDawg said:

No problem. I’ll add you to the ‘Don’t have a clue/political hack list.’

Oh snap! You were already there.

 

I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said! 

[Porter]

2 hours ago, Slim Charles said:

So exactly what is your argument or point here? That there is no one within Iranian leadership who want a deal and for this to end? You believe Iran is completely unified in it's stance against a deal and they all want war? The entire Iranian leadership is made up of factions, including the IRGC. And you think they are all on the same page? 

When we had them against the ropes on the initial strikes they should have went for the kill shot and removed the regime. These prolonged love tabs is not going to do it. The longer this goes without taking the regime out the weaker we look. Keep in mind we are financing this war even with us approaching 40 trillion in debt. Smh

[Porter]

BREAKING: IRAN BURNS. The ceasefire is OVER. Multiple American strikes across the Iranian coast, as the U.S. tries to knock down Iran's ability to control the Strait of Hormuz. Iran is threatening to target American military bases in the region in retaliation.

- Kevin Steele

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Thanks for the math lesson. Relevance? The hypocrisy. Never heard a peep back then. Always the fake outrage.

If “whatabout” is your best move that’s because you got nothing left in the tank.

[OlDawg]

3 hours ago, Porter said:

Yeah but Trump has given the Israel soldiers superpowers! 😂Smh 

Israel is technologically advanced compared to Iran. But, numbers & sheer geographical area make a full-blown invasion of Iran by Israel a losing proposition--and the Israeli's know it. In addition, the Abraham Accords would be shredded, and the region would be thrown into chaos because the Arab/Muslim States would never accept an invasion strictly by Israel. They tolerate it when the U.S. does it because of common interests and needs. But, that doesn't mean they like it any better.

For perspective, at the height of the operations in Iraq in 2007, the U.S. had about 170,000 military personnel deployed in country. That's the size of Israel's entire active manpower, and only leaves call up reserves for home defense against Hezbollah and Hamas--who would both take the opportunity to hammer Israel for all they're worth. Iran is over 250% bigger in geographical land mass than Iraq.

No. U.S. boots on the ground will be required if boots are utilized. And you can kiss off the Gulf States helping. They won't lift a finger other than in defense, and allowing the U.S. to stage.

NATO? Europeans? Ha! Riiiigggghhhttt...

[Reagan]

29 minutes ago, UT alum said:

If “whatabout” is your best move that’s because you got nothing left in the tank.

Facts are a stubborn son-of-a-gun!  

[baddog]

39 minutes ago, UT alum said:

If “whatabout” is your best move that’s because you got nothing left in the tank.

Yeah, I know, liberals don’t like being called out on their hypocrisy. It has nothing to do with running out of ammo. I have an entire thread dedicated to showing the hypocrisy of the left. Plenty of ammo left. I see you got a like from hood boy, so you should be proud. He always answers my post with someone who quoted me, something he can’t do. Lmao