ANOTHER ICE SHOOTING IN Minneapolis

[DCT]

12 minutes ago, DCT said:

 

2 ice agents may have lied.

 

The teacher also worked in a Hispanic district. 

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

 

2 ice agents may have lied.

 

What does that have to do with my post?  Do you actually agree they should have been fired?

 

[baddog]

 

[tvc184]

12 hours ago, DCT said:

 

2 ice agents may have lied.

 

So the Trump administration does an independent review of the shooting and concluded that the agents lied, have been relieved of duty and are facing termination and criminal charges.

First, it kind of puts a damper on the continued claim in all law enforcement cases that everything is covered up.

Secondly it is apparently the Trump administration that broke the news.

I don’t think anyone on any side of an issue has a problem with going after crooked law enforcement officers. 

[DCT]

5 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

So the Trump administration does an independent review of the shooting and concluded that the agents lied, have been relieved of duty and are facing termination and criminal charges.

First, it kind of puts a damper on the continued claim in all law enforcement cases that everything is covered up.

Secondly it is apparently the Trump administration that broke the news.

I don’t think anyone on any side of an issue has a problem with going after crooked law enforcement officers. 

This administration has a problem.

[DCT]

11 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

What does that have to do with my post?  Do you actually agree they should have been fired?

 

Yes, under this current administration actions affecting individuals based on their speech. 

[LumRaiderFan]

1 minute ago, DCT said:

Yes, under this current administration actions affecting individuals based on their speech. 

So if I posted “Back the Blue”, I should be at risk of being fired?

[DCT]

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So if I posted “Back the Blue”, I should be at risk of being fired?

Under this current administration yes. I won't go into detail but we have many examples.

[LumRaiderFan]

2 minutes ago, DCT said:

Under this current administration yes. I won't go into detail but we have many examples.

Ridiculous statement.

[DCT]

1 minute ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Ridiculous statement.

I agree but it's true.  This is the day and times we live in.

[LumRaiderFan]

1 minute ago, DCT said:

I agree but it's true.  This is the day and times we live in.

It’s not true at all, you simply choose to believe it is because you hate Trump so much.

[DCT]

12 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

It’s not true at all, you simply choose to believe it is because you hate Trump so much.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I didn't say anything hateful to you about Trump.  You asked a legitimate question and I gave a honest response.

[baddog]

 

[DCT]

On 2/16/2026 at 2:09 PM, LumRaiderFan said:

Ridiculous statement.

 

Proof.

[thetragichippy]

48 minutes ago, DCT said:

 

Proof.

Proof of what?  That Colbert is a liar?

“We were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast,” Colbert told his viewers Monday night.

CBS told a different story in a statement Tuesday afternoon: The network said “The Late Show” was given “legal guidance” but was not “prohibited” from broadcasting the interview.

The Federal Communications Commission, which regulates local stations owned by broadcasters like CBS, recently issued new guidance about an old regulation known as the “equal time” rule.

The rules do not apply to cable or streaming — which is why Colbert’s show posted the Talarico interview on YouTube as an “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

” — but do apply to local TV and radio stations.

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

[DCT]

24 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Proof of what?  That Colbert is a liar?

“We were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast,” Colbert told his viewers Monday night.

CBS told a different story in a statement Tuesday afternoon: The network said “The Late Show” was given “legal guidance” but was not “prohibited” from broadcasting the interview.

 

The Federal Communications Commission, which regulates local stations owned by broadcasters like CBS, recently issued new guidance about an old regulation known as the “equal time” rule.

The rules do not apply to cable or streaming — which is why Colbert’s show posted the Talarico interview on YouTube as an “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

” — but do apply to local TV and radio stations.

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

Various courts have ruled that the Trump administration has violated the First Amendment right through specific policies and procedures such as forcing partisan messages on federal employees and blocking critics on social media. Threatening to use government powers-including leveraging federal funding, imposing sanctions, and even attempting to seize patents to retaliate against universities.

 

[DCT]

14 minutes ago, DCT said:

Various courts have ruled that the Trump administration has violated the First Amendment right through specific policies and procedures such as forcing partisan messages on federal employees and blocking critics on social media. Threatening to use government powers-including leveraging federal funding, imposing sanctions, and even attempting to seize patents to retaliate against universities.

 

He has fired or punished experienced professionals in various departments, including public health and safety, for their perceived political views.