Big girl Posted yesterday at 02:09 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:09 PM On 1/22/2026 at 8:52 AM, DCT said: I agree. I don’t know why he chose this forum to ask about policy. 1951denmark, USA agreement The 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement between the U.S. and Denmark allowed the United States to construct, operate, and maintain military bases (notably Thule Air Base) and station personnel in Greenland as part of This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . It granted the U.S. broad operational rights, creating a lasting, nearly unrestricted military presence in the region. Key aspects of the 1951 agreement: Military Access: The U.S. gained authority to operate in designated areas, allowing for This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Sovereignty: While granting access, the treaty formally recognized Danish sovereignty over Greenland. Cold War Context: The pact was established to counter threats during the Cold War and to facilitate the defense of the North Atlantic area. Duration: The agreement was tied to the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO) and was intended to last for the duration of that treaty. Legacy: As of 2026, this foundational agreement still governs the U.S. military presence in Greenland, with recent, ongoing discussions centered on updating it for modern security needs, such as restricting Chinese and Russian investments in the territory. Quote
Reagan Posted yesterday at 03:20 PM Report Posted yesterday at 03:20 PM 1 hour ago, Big girl said: 1951denmark, USA agreement The 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement between the U.S. and Denmark allowed the United States to construct, operate, and maintain military bases (notably Thule Air Base) and station personnel in Greenland as part of This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . It granted the U.S. broad operational rights, creating a lasting, nearly unrestricted military presence in the region. Key aspects of the 1951 agreement: Military Access: The U.S. gained authority to operate in designated areas, allowing for This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Sovereignty: While granting access, the treaty formally recognized Danish sovereignty over Greenland. Cold War Context: The pact was established to counter threats during the Cold War and to facilitate the defense of the North Atlantic area. Duration: The agreement was tied to the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO) and was intended to last for the duration of that treaty. Legacy: As of 2026, this foundational agreement still governs the U.S. military presence in Greenland, with recent, ongoing discussions centered on updating it for modern security needs, such as restricting Chinese and Russian investments in the territory. Post what the new agreement says. Quote
DCT Posted yesterday at 03:41 PM Report Posted yesterday at 03:41 PM 21 minutes ago, Reagan said: Post what the new agreement says. I know you have it. Please share. Quote
Reagan Posted yesterday at 03:53 PM Report Posted yesterday at 03:53 PM 9 minutes ago, DCT said: I know you have it. Please share. No, sounded like @Big girl had all the inside scoop. But since you liked her post, I figured she may have shared it with you. So feel free to post it if she doesn’t want to. Quote
DCT Posted yesterday at 03:54 PM Report Posted yesterday at 03:54 PM 4 minutes ago, Reagan said: No, sounded like @Big girl had all the inside scoop. But since you liked her post, I figured she may have shared it with you. So feel free to post it if she doesn’t want to. I don’t dispute her post. Looks good to me, so I gave it a like. Quote
Big girl Posted yesterday at 04:03 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:03 PM 43 minutes ago, Reagan said: Post what the new agreement says. You posted it earlier in this thread. Quote
Reagan Posted yesterday at 04:08 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:08 PM 3 minutes ago, Big girl said: You posted it earlier in this thread. It wasn’t the total agreement. It sounded like you had “all” the info. Thought you could post it. Quote
baddog Posted yesterday at 04:10 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:10 PM They’re still working out the kinks. Quote
Big girl Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 8 hours ago, Reagan said: It wasn’t the total agreement. It sounded like you had “all” the info. Thought you could post it. Yeah right. How embarrassing Quote
Reagan Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Big girl said: Yeah right. How embarrassing I’m not trying to embarrass you! 😁 DCT 1 Quote
OlDawg Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago I posted the updated 2004 agreement earlier in this thread. It’s the latest, in effect agreement. It really doesn’t matter what NATO agreed to in principle. The agreement will be between Greenland, Denmark, and the U.S.—IF there is a new one. To me, that’s debatable until I actually see it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.