Another Trump Victory

[Porter]

On 12/8/2025 at 7:09 AM, DCT said:

Your president would have you to believe it is Tylenol. 😂 

Has the Democrat Party figured out the definition of a woman yet?

[Reagan]

36 minutes ago, Porter said:

Has the Democrat Party figured out the definition of a woman yet?

Speaking of which.  Is Justice Jackson’s judicial buffoonery giving black women a bad name?  From the article:  Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has made a pretty strange name for herself on the Supreme Court, and it’s not because she’s carefully sticking to the Constitution. Over and over, she sounds less like a judge calling balls and strikes and more like an activist trying to steer outcomes she personally approves of or has been told to push. She feels a lot like a DEI (she is) activist judge, used more for her willingness to play the game and control than actually because she’s a fair judge.  In a recent Supreme Court exchange, Justice Jackson argued that presidents should not be able to fire so-called “experts” who run large parts of the federal government."   Where does the Constitution fit here?!  One saving grace is if the Supreme Court eventually sides with Trump and Joebama's autopens are invalid, she may be gone!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

@Big girl  @UT alum  @DCT  @Boyz N Da Hood

[DCT]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

She is a woman.
 

Midterms are coming.

[baddog]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

She is a woman.
 

Midterms are coming.

Can she define herself? Hey, are the midterms coming?

[OlDawg]

19 hours ago, Reagan said:

Speaking of which.  Is Justice Jackson’s judicial buffoonery giving black women a bad name?  From the article:  Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has made a pretty strange name for herself on the Supreme Court, and it’s not because she’s carefully sticking to the Constitution. Over and over, she sounds less like a judge calling balls and strikes and more like an activist trying to steer outcomes she personally approves of or has been told to push. She feels a lot like a DEI (she is) activist judge, used more for her willingness to play the game and control than actually because she’s a fair judge.  In a recent Supreme Court exchange, Justice Jackson argued that presidents should not be able to fire so-called “experts” who run large parts of the federal government."   Where does the Constitution fit here?!  One saving grace is if the Supreme Court eventually sides with Trump and Joebama's autopens are invalid, she may be gone!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

@Big girl  @UT alum  @DCT  @Boyz N Da Hood

This is exactly why you want originalists in the Court vs. liberal revisionists. Originalists interpret intent & principles that apply across the decades. Those who say the Constitution is a ‘living document’ are full of it.

Free speech (1st Amendment), right to bear arms (2nd), illegal search (4th), etc. principles remain the same as original intent whether the Framers knew about social media, specific firearms or not. Same with the other bedrock principles.

The principles remain the same, and are just applied to current.

Anything above that, and judges aren’t interpreting—which is their charge. They’re legislating. Which isn’t their arena.

[DCT]

5 hours ago, baddog said:

Can she define herself? Hey, are the midterms coming?

Miami, Florida is a Democratic city. 😂
She, Higgins is defined as a woman.  The 1st woman mayor and she beats Trump pick. First Democratic Mayor in nearly 30 years.

Trump currently holds 220 of the 435 seats.  Marjorie,Stefanie,Nehls, and Arrington have announced they will not seek re-election.

Yes, 🌊 is coming.

[baddog]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

Miami, Florida is a Democratic city. 😂
She, Higgins is defined as a woman.  The 1st woman mayor and she beats Trump pick. First Democratic Mayor in nearly 30 years.

Trump currently holds 220 of the 435 seats.  Marjorie,Stefanie,Nehls, and Arrington have announced they will not seek re-election.

Yes, 🌊 is coming.

So, what does that mean if the dems take over? They will sit on their hands? What’s the difference? Dems never pass any legislation with Americans in mind. All they do is steal from the taxpayers. That’s what you want? And you said you are a conservative. 
Yes, she’s a dem M-A-Y-O-R, not a congresswoman. Watch Miami rot. Can she define a woman? It would surprise me.

[DCT]

6 hours ago, baddog said:

Can she define herself? Hey, are the midterms coming?

Can you define yourself?  Ask her.  
It is apparent she won.

[baddog]

3 minutes ago, DCT said:

Can you define yourself?  Ask her.  
It is apparent she won.

Stop deflecting. Can she define a woman? Can you? That’s all you gleaned from my post? You have become pointless with your babble.

[DCT]

7 minutes ago, baddog said:

Stop deflecting. Can she define a woman? Can you? That’s all you gleaned from my post? You have become pointless with your babble.

Will Trump release the files?  Can you define a pedophile?

[baddog]

16 minutes ago, DCT said:

Will Trump release the files?  Can you define a pedophile?

It’s been fun. Last time I respond. Your deflection is ridiculous. Need a hankie?

[DCT]

6 minutes ago, baddog said:

It’s been fun. Last time I respond. Your deflection is ridiculous. Need a hankie?

May God bless you too.

[baddog]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[DCT]

9 minutes ago, baddog said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

You have to subscribe to read it.

[DCT]

On 12/10/2025 at 2:12 PM, Reagan said:

Speaking of which.  Is Justice Jackson’s judicial buffoonery giving black women a bad name?  From the article:  Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has made a pretty strange name for herself on the Supreme Court, and it’s not because she’s carefully sticking to the Constitution. Over and over, she sounds less like a judge calling balls and strikes and more like an activist trying to steer outcomes she personally approves of or has been told to push. She feels a lot like a DEI (she is) activist judge, used more for her willingness to play the game and control than actually because she’s a fair judge.  In a recent Supreme Court exchange, Justice Jackson argued that presidents should not be able to fire so-called “experts” who run large parts of the federal government."   Where does the Constitution fit here?!  One saving grace is if the Supreme Court eventually sides with Trump and Joebama's autopens are invalid, she may be gone!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

@Big girl  @UT alum  @DCT  @Boyz N Da Hood

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up