Comey Indicted

[baddog]

32 minutes ago, UT alum said:

What did he do besides his job? There are no indictments or convictions against him. It’s all here say. Your Trump Worship Syndrome is clouding your vision.

I keep forgetting you libs love the criminal elements of society. Release cop killers and sexual predators. Defund police and the like…..but act like you are the law. Ain’t no egg on this face….boy. Yeah, you read every post.

[Reagan]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

You a lawyer?

No, but I can read.  1) do you feel this is the correct statute that I included for this situation?  2) I'm sure you read it.  Based on this, do you think it is or is not a valid appointment?  Trump and his team are not stupid.  They would not have moved forward with this high profile indictment with an invalid appointment.  

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

So you know what they were shown? You know that indictments are only as good as the prosecutor who brings it to the grand jury. This was like a PA trying to do brain surgery.

Do you? I'll answer that for you....NO

The Judge didn't mention that.....so, that is not in question

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

What did he do besides his job? There are no indictments or convictions against him. It’s all here say. Your Trump Worship Syndrome is clouding your vision.

Did you really say that after years and years of calling Trump guilty FOR EVERYTHING🤣

It is very hard to take you serious lol

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

What did he do besides his job? There are no indictments or convictions against him. It’s all here say. Your Trump Worship Syndrome is clouding your vision.

Hey @LumRaiderFan, Looks like UT Alum has realized that entire innocent until proven guilty is really a thing. It's weird it took him 10 years of calling Trump guilty on EVERYTHING to remember.....LOLOLOL

[LumRaiderFan]

37 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Did you really say that after years and years of calling Trump guilty FOR EVERYTHING🤣

It is very hard to take you serious lol

That ship has sailed for me, lol.

[mat]

Watched Cuomo last night and he said statute of limitations may prevent an appeal and reindictment.

[thetragichippy]

11 hours ago, mat said:

Watched Cuomo last night and he said statute of limitations may prevent an appeal and reindictment.

There is some wording issues. I follow a pretty unbiased attorney on another social media platform. He said the statute granting a 6 month extension seems to depend on whether the dismissed indictment was a "void" or voidable" act.

If it was a "void" that likely means it was a nullity, did not stop the statute from running, and the statute has expired.

If it was "Voidable" then it was valid until it was invalidated, the statute was met by the indictment back when it was returned, and the 6 month extension likely applies.....

Any attorneys on the page care to chime in?

[Big girl]

21 hours ago, baddog said:

I keep forgetting you libs love the criminal elements of society. Release cop killers and sexual predators. Defund police and the like…..but act like you are the law. Ain’t no egg on this face….boy. Yeah, you read every post.

Says the man the voted for a convicted felony. 

[Big girl]

20 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

Hey @LumRaiderFan, Looks like UT Alum has realized that entire innocent until proven guilty is really a thing. It's weird it took him 10 years of calling Trump guilty on EVERYTHING to remember.....LOLOLOL

Trump was proven guilty. He is a convicted felon.

[Big girl]

20 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

Do you? I'll answer that for you....NO

The Judge didn't mention that.....so, that is not in question

Yes, the judges mentioned it.

[Big girl]

20 hours ago, Reagan said:

No, but I can read.  1) do you feel this is the correct statute that I included for this situation?  2) I'm sure you read it.  Based on this, do you think it is or is not a valid appointment?  Trump and his team are not stupid.  They would not have moved forward with this high profile indictment with an invalid appointment.  

Yes they are. He appointed someone who was an aide last year to submit documents. He is really stupid

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, Big girl said:

Yes, the judges mentioned it.

Show me

[UT alum]

On 11/25/2025 at 1:37 PM, Reagan said:

No, but I can read.  1) do you feel this is the correct statute that I included for this situation?  2) I'm sure you read it.  Based on this, do you think it is or is not a valid appointment?  Trump and his team are not stupid.  They would not have moved forward with this high profile indictment with an invalid appointment.  

He cannot repeatedly appoint temporary prosecutors. Halliday is a temporary replacing a temporary. If he could, he would circumvent the Senate’s duty to confirm appointments.  That was how the judge interpreted the statute, and I’ll  bet dollars to donuts the Supremes uphold the ruling.

[mat]

11 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

There is some wording issues. I follow a pretty unbiased attorney on another social media platform. He said the statute granting a 6 month extension seems to depend on whether the dismissed indictment was a "void" or voidable" act.

If it was a "void" that likely means it was a nullity, did not stop the statute from running, and the statute has expired.

If it was "Voidable" then it was valid until it was invalidated, the statute was met by the indictment back when it was returned, and the 6 month extension likely applies.....

Any attorneys on the page care to chime in?

Your commentary alone wreaked of a legal crap show.

[thetragichippy]

32 minutes ago, mat said:

Your commentary alone wreaked of a legal crap show.

That is what it is going to be.

[Reagan]

On 11/25/2025 at 9:13 PM, mat said:

Watched Cuomo last night and he said statute of limitations may prevent an appeal and reindictment.

Did the statue of limitations matter when that woman, E. Jean Carroll, accused Trump of rape, like, what -- 100 years ago?

[thetragichippy]

On 11/26/2025 at 11:57 PM, Reagan said:

Did the statue of limitations matter when that woman, E. Jean Carroll, accused Trump of rape, like, what -- 100 years ago?

I believe that was civil versus criminal.....

[Reagan]

1 minute ago, thetragichippy said:

I believe that was civil versus criminal.....

Statue of limitations are different?

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, Reagan said:

Statue of limitations are different?

In some cases, and it appears to vary state by state

The statute of limitations did not apply to Jean Carroll's civil case against Donald Trump because she sued under New York's 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, a law passed in 2022 that created a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors to file civil lawsuits beyond the normal time limits. The law allowed her to sue for sexual assault (battery) even though the original statute of limitations for that crime had expired. The second lawsuit was also able to move forward with the defamation claims based on statements Trump made after the original filing. 

 

[baddog]

5 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

In some cases, and it appears to vary state by state

The statute of limitations did not apply to Jean Carroll's civil case against Donald Trump because she sued under New York's 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, a law passed in 2022 that created a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors to file civil lawsuits beyond the normal time limits. The law allowed her to sue for sexual assault (battery) even though the original statute of limitations for that crime had expired. The second lawsuit was also able to move forward with the defamation claims based on statements Trump made after the original filing. 

 

How convenient.

[Reagan]

52 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

In some cases, and it appears to vary state by state

The statute of limitations did not apply to Jean Carroll's civil case against Donald Trump because she sued under New York's 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, a law passed in 2022 that created a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors to file civil lawsuits beyond the normal time limits. The law allowed her to sue for sexual assault (battery) even though the original statute of limitations for that crime had expired. The second lawsuit was also able to move forward with the defamation claims based on statements Trump made after the original filing. 

 

I guess the point is that there's always ways around it.  The DOJ will find a way around Comey's statue of limitations claim.  By the way, Comey is the only one I know of that has brought it up.  Anyway -- I'm sure that 2022 law was for her and NY's TDS!