baddog Posted 21 hours ago Author Report Posted 21 hours ago 32 minutes ago, UT alum said: What did he do besides his job? There are no indictments or convictions against him. It’s all here say. Your Trump Worship Syndrome is clouding your vision. I keep forgetting you libs love the criminal elements of society. Release cop killers and sexual predators. Defund police and the like…..but act like you are the law. Ain’t no egg on this face….boy. Yeah, you read every post. Quote
Reagan Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 3 hours ago, UT alum said: You a lawyer? No, but I can read. 1) do you feel this is the correct statute that I included for this situation? 2) I'm sure you read it. Based on this, do you think it is or is not a valid appointment? Trump and his team are not stupid. They would not have moved forward with this high profile indictment with an invalid appointment. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, UT alum said: So you know what they were shown? You know that indictments are only as good as the prosecutor who brings it to the grand jury. This was like a PA trying to do brain surgery. Do you? I'll answer that for you....NO The Judge didn't mention that.....so, that is not in question Quote
thetragichippy Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, UT alum said: What did he do besides his job? There are no indictments or convictions against him. It’s all here say. Your Trump Worship Syndrome is clouding your vision. Did you really say that after years and years of calling Trump guilty FOR EVERYTHING🤣 It is very hard to take you serious lol LumRaiderFan and Reagan 2 Quote
thetragichippy Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, UT alum said: What did he do besides his job? There are no indictments or convictions against him. It’s all here say. Your Trump Worship Syndrome is clouding your vision. Hey @LumRaiderFan, Looks like UT Alum has realized that entire innocent until proven guilty is really a thing. It's weird it took him 10 years of calling Trump guilty on EVERYTHING to remember.....LOLOLOL LumRaiderFan and baddog 2 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 37 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Did you really say that after years and years of calling Trump guilty FOR EVERYTHING🤣 It is very hard to take you serious lol That ship has sailed for me, lol. thetragichippy 1 Quote
mat Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago Watched Cuomo last night and he said statute of limitations may prevent an appeal and reindictment. DCT 1 Quote
thetragichippy Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, mat said: Watched Cuomo last night and he said statute of limitations may prevent an appeal and reindictment. There is some wording issues. I follow a pretty unbiased attorney on another social media platform. He said the statute granting a 6 month extension seems to depend on whether the dismissed indictment was a "void" or voidable" act. If it was a "void" that likely means it was a nullity, did not stop the statute from running, and the statute has expired. If it was "Voidable" then it was valid until it was invalidated, the statute was met by the indictment back when it was returned, and the 6 month extension likely applies..... Any attorneys on the page care to chime in? Quote
Big girl Posted 52 minutes ago Report Posted 52 minutes ago 21 hours ago, baddog said: I keep forgetting you libs love the criminal elements of society. Release cop killers and sexual predators. Defund police and the like…..but act like you are the law. Ain’t no egg on this face….boy. Yeah, you read every post. Says the man the voted for a convicted felony. Quote
Big girl Posted 50 minutes ago Report Posted 50 minutes ago 20 hours ago, thetragichippy said: Hey @LumRaiderFan, Looks like UT Alum has realized that entire innocent until proven guilty is really a thing. It's weird it took him 10 years of calling Trump guilty on EVERYTHING to remember.....LOLOLOL Trump was proven guilty. He is a convicted felon. Quote
Big girl Posted 49 minutes ago Report Posted 49 minutes ago 20 hours ago, thetragichippy said: Do you? I'll answer that for you....NO The Judge didn't mention that.....so, that is not in question Yes, the judges mentioned it. Quote
Big girl Posted 47 minutes ago Report Posted 47 minutes ago 20 hours ago, Reagan said: No, but I can read. 1) do you feel this is the correct statute that I included for this situation? 2) I'm sure you read it. Based on this, do you think it is or is not a valid appointment? Trump and his team are not stupid. They would not have moved forward with this high profile indictment with an invalid appointment. Yes they are. He appointed someone who was an aide last year to submit documents. He is really stupid Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.