Comey Indicted

[mat]

On 9/30/2025 at 4:33 PM, mat said:

I’ll take back my distraction statement when he’s actually convicted.

I’m no political expert, but I saw this one coming.

[Reagan]

25 minutes ago, mat said:

I’m no political expert, but I saw this one coming.

A radical judge dismissed this.  They WILL be reindicted!  It was dismissed without prejudice:  "Dismissed without prejudice means that a court case has been temporarily dismissed, allowing the party who filed the case to refile it later. This type of dismissal does not prevent the party from bringing the same claim back to court in the future."

@Boyz N Da Hood

[thetragichippy]

31 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

Dismissed 

They were procedural issues not merit issues....and apparently the Judge knew that because he dismissed "without prejudice", meaning they can and will be indicted again. 

[thetragichippy]

17 minutes ago, Reagan said:

A radical judge dismissed this. 

I'm not sure this meets "radical Judge" - a radical Judge could have dismissed "WITH Prejudice" and it would be over

[baddog]

Sure are some sorry excuses for human beings siding with a pos like Comey. Comey is about as dirty as they come, but libs lap it up.

[thetragichippy]

Just now, baddog said:

Sure are some sorry excuses for human beings siding with a pos like Comey. Comey is about as dirty as they come, but libs lap it up.

They're not siding with Comey, they're siding against the administration.  Think about it, very seldom do any from the left agree with anything this Administration has done. 

[baddog]

6 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

They're not siding with Comey, they're siding against the administration.  Think about it, very seldom do any from the left agree with anything this Administration has done. 

True enough, but the fact that they are willing to overlook anything criminal the left does tells me they aren’t on the side of justice. Celebrating the dismissal shows no integrity.

[Boyz N Da Hood]

1 hour ago, thetragichippy said:

They were procedural issues not merit issues....and apparently the Judge knew that because he dismissed "without prejudice", meaning they can and will be indicted again. 

Yeah I understand  the reasoning... let's see what happens.. "lock her up, lock her up" how many years later  and nothing? SSDD

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

"lock her up, lock her up"

Trump said during his first term that he didn't think it would do America any good to go after Hillary, so he didn't.  Some quotes below - You're not the only one who seems to have trouble remembering things in context. 

"I don't want to hurt the Clintons, I really don't. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways, and I am not looking to hurt them at all".

"I think we have to get the focus of the country into looking forward".

"I feel that I want to focus on jobs, I want to focus on health care, I want to focus on the border and immigration and doing a really great immigration bill... And I want to focus on — all of these other things that we've been talking about".

[DCT]

4 hours ago, Reagan said:

A radical judge dismissed this.  They WILL be reindicted!  It was dismissed without prejudice:  "Dismissed without prejudice means that a court case has been temporarily dismissed, allowing the party who filed the case to refile it later. This type of dismissal does not prevent the party from bringing the same claim back to court in the future."

@Boyz N Da Hood

Won’t happen.  Bigger things need to be addressed.