Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
48 minutes ago, Reagan said:

One has to keep in mind that the BBC is government controlled!  So…

 

48 minutes ago, Reagan said:

One has to keep in mind that the BBC is government controlled!  So…

The United States is controlled by the government.

Do you dispute the article?  I could have posted her live news appearance but kept it short.

Posted
9 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

Does it though? 
 

You think Melania would of had this press conference without Trumps approval? 

There was no need; She had nothing to prove, and her name wasn’t thrown around.

Posted
10 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

It was, I even provided names of people who had to apologize because they were threatened with lawsuits

I don't doubt you.  I did not see it and the timing of her coming out was odd.

Posted
4 minutes ago, DCT said:

Why does Bondi feel she should get a pass when the Clintons didn't?  Her day is coming. 

If you are talking about Bondi and the subpoena? 

Why did Merric Garland, William Barr, Eric Holder and Janet Reno ignore subpoenas and where held in contempt with no repercussions? 

Posted
8 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

If you are talking about Bondi and the subpoena? 

Why did Merric Garland, William Barr, Eric Holder and Janet Reno ignore subpoenas and where held in contempt with no repercussions? 

You ignore the fact that the Clintons were subpoenaed and folks were outraged when the Clintons declined.    She will always be know as the protecter of child m.  Clintons were threaten with jail time.  Bondi is a civilian and nolnger holds the title of   Attorney General witch makes your point mute. Thank you for responding.

Posted
2 hours ago, DCT said:

You ignore the fact that the Clintons were subpoenaed and folks were outraged when the Clintons declined.    She will always be know as the protecter of child m.  Clintons were threaten with jail time.  Bondi is a civilian and nolnger holds the title of   Attorney General witch makes your point mute. Thank you for responding.

Actually it is not mute….the reason none of those folks were held accountable is because the DOJ under those administrations didn’t do anything…..do they have the votes to hold her in contempt?  

Posted
13 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

Actually it is not mute….the reason none of those folks were held accountable is because the DOJ under those administrations didn’t do anything…..do they have the votes to hold her in contempt?  

Due to the fact that it is the Epstein files I would say yes.  

Posted
20 minutes ago, baddog said:

87 pages and still no Trump. 🤪

Karma is a .....

10 years going after Trump, and their spokesperson for anything anti-Trump, a member of house intelligence has been date raping staffers,,,,,,,

We have recent text and bank records, not just allegations - he's in trouble BIGLEY

Posted
15 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Karma is a .....

10 years going after Trump, and their spokesperson for anything anti-Trump, a member of house intelligence has been date raping staffers,,,,,,,

We have recent text and bank records, not just allegations - he's in trouble BIGLEY

With that thought in mind, the claim is that they’re policing their own. Lmao. Here’s the truth….

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,740
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SunshineRae
    Newest Member
    SunshineRae
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...