Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/25/2025 at 12:41 PM, baddog said:

How many people have to say Trump wasn’t involved before the libs believe it? Epstein himself could have said Trump wasn’t involved and the libs would say he was threatened, bribed, he was lying,……whatever. It seems to me that the libs are protecting those who have been mentioned, other than Trump. 
Hollywood is full of perverts, ask Cory Feldman and others. Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein knew each other and ran in the same circles, yet none of you libs ever mention these connections. It tells me you are not after justice or after putting an end to child trafficking……just get Trump. That is so juvenile that it’s pathetic. Lots of powerful, wealthy people in Hollywood who have lots of connections to politicians, businessmen, and even world leaders. Do you want to stop the trafficking or just “GET TRUMP”. 
I say look at the money trail to Epstein, which we know exists, because he was funded well and he was also blackmailing. These are the true culprits……the money people.

Paranoia strikes deep…

Posted

DCT contributing his facial expressions since he can’t rebut my post. It was a good, sensible post, I have to admit. When you can get a lib to copy/paste from Huff Post, you know they’re desperate.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Reagan said:

NBC News Tries to Get Epstein Victims to “Expose” Trump . . . They Immediately Do the Opposite!

This is the hidden content, please

@Big girl  @UT alum  @DCT  @Boyz N Da Hood

Like I said before, they don’t want everybody without Trump. The libs on this board, or anywhere, will not believe these victims. They will say they were coerced. Libs are not after justice because they protect criminals. Tell me I’m wrong.

Posted
6 minutes ago, baddog said:

Like I said before, they don’t want everybody without Trump. The libs on this board, or anywhere, will not believe these victims. They will say they were coerced. Libs are not after justice because they protect criminals. Tell me I’m wrong.

If this doesn’t implicate Trump, liberals aren’t interested.

Posted

Where’s all the pedo accusers? You know, the ones who convict and hate without one shred of evidence? Only real men admit when they’re wrong. Hate is a pretty strong driving force. Too bad it’s built on lies. Lmao.

Posted

Sooo, I'm watching CNN tonight and one of the victims says THEY have a list of the pedo's and they may release it if Trump does not....while at the same time saying Trump is not on the list.

So for all these years, under Biden and before, they had the names but held on to it? Can someone explain to me why they waited until the Trump admin to demand this when they had the names they could of released years ago......like while Epstein was alive???

Posted
53 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Sooo, I'm watching CNN tonight and one of the victims says THEY have a list of the pedo's and they may release it if Trump does not....while at the same time saying Trump is not on the list.

So for all these years, under Biden and before, they had the names but held on to it? Can someone explain to me why they waited until the Trump admin to demand this when they had the names they could of released years ago......like while Epstein was alive???

Their million dollar--or more--settlements may have required silence? Now that Epstein is dead, maybe the NDA's don't apply? I dunno. Just spit ballin' here...

Posted

Yes, a settlement was reached between 
This is the hidden content, please
 and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, resulting in a $290 million payment to be distributed among the survivors. 
Additionally, Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $75 million to victims in a separate, earlier settlement. These deals, approved by federal judges in 2023, aimed to resolve claims that the banks were complicit in Epstein's sex-trafficking scheme by continuing to do business with him despite warnings of his activities. 
 
JPMorgan Chase Settlement
  • Amount: $290 million 
     
  • Purpose: To compensate sexual abuse victims of Jeffrey Epstein and resolve claims that JPMorgan failed to act on warnings about his sex trafficking activities. 
     
  • Approval: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement in November 2023. 
     
This is the hidden content, please
 Settlement
 
 
  • Amount: $75 million 
  • Purpose: To settle a lawsuit accusing Deutsche Bank of enabling and benefiting from Epstein's sex trafficking. 
  • Approval: This "groundbreaking" settlement was approved in May 2023. 
Key Takeaways
  • These settlements are part of a broader effort by Epstein's victims to secure financial restitution by pursuing lawsuits against financial institutions that worked with him. 
     
  • The JPMorgan settlement also helps to fund the distribution process, with any remaining funds to be donated to a charity. 
     
  • These deals resolve class-action lawsuits brought by victims, not the criminal case that led to Epstein's 2019 arrest and his eventual death in jail. 
Posted
12 hours ago, OlDawg said:

Their million dollar--or more--settlements may have required silence? Now that Epstein is dead, maybe the NDA's don't apply? I dunno. Just spit ballin' here...

After 2 divorces, I can testify that not all women tell the truth. 

The way this is playing out, it seems this is all political. They were basically silent during the Biden administration. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,321
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Khoeshi Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Khoeshi Muhammad
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...