Jump to content

WO-S vs. #1 Giddings Predictions?/GAME TIME CHANGE


KFDM COOP

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if giddings does not have brock then wos should win by at least 3 touchdowns. i believe our offense will be just fine if they stay focused. but no matter how good you are if you make lots of mistakes you will not win. plus if wos is ahead by half then they should win since they are a very tough 2nd half team. i have to say wos is one of the best adjusting team i have seen of any team out there.

35-14 wos wins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I think that regardless if brock plays or not...WO-S will pull out a "W".  Sure, it might be a little easier if he is hurt, but I will believe that he is hurt on Friday night when I don't see him on the field.  If he is hurt, I hope that it isn't bad because he petitioned to play this season when he should have gone to college...either way...our Mustangs will do what they have been doing...adjusting to each team (usually at halftime) and if it is a win by +1 or +99...a win is a win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Wos Grad 2000

What concerns me is Giddings Defense. They are stout! I saw where Caldwell averges 40 points a game and they were only able to put a 7 on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to the game friday, and was not very impressed at all. Their backup QB was ejected for fighting in the 4th quarter. Sealy could have easily won the game by at least 3 td's but their offense lacked a few plays that would have put them on top. Two of their drives ended in field goals, one field goal was missed. They also crossed the giddings 40 yard line 3 times and went away with nothing. The sealy defense played lights out all night the only reason giddings even scored was good field position due to fumbles. The sealy defense made giddings fumble at least 3 or 4 times and when fitzhenry was in the game they hit him every play no matter what so if WO-S plays good we should come away with the win. It is totally up to them to block hard and pursue with a vengeance and take this team out of the picture! ;D ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen to that.  

With or without old brock...the Mustangs will do what it takes!  It might be a closer game (DUH!!! ::)) but regardless, the Mustangs will grind this one out.  

This late in the season and your QB is ejected for fighting...DISCIPLINE seems lacking...DISCIPLINE is a must and something that WO-S possesses...it just might be what wins the game!!! ;)

As far as the passing game, I think that if we are forced to use it, we'll be okay.  We have some decent receivers who have had a little practice.  Seems that Hypo isn't overthrowing them any more. ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Wos Grad 2000

Lord i hope your right but we can't wait until the 2nd half to start playing like we have so many times this year against a team like Giddings or anybody else left in the postseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've made up my mind that I'm going to the Katy game. Only problem, I can't find date and location for it. Can someone help me out?

Oh yeah, I hope Giddings loses this one big and gets a dose of reality. They're solid, but they're not this high and mighty, invincible team everyone thinks they are.

__________________

"I wouldn't give two (___)s for a man who lost and laughed." - General George S. Patton

This is from 3a down low. lets make it happen stangs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...