Jump to content

Surrenderer-In-Chief!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

I’m serious brother, we need another trump Taliban peace treaty 

Tell us ol' childish wise one, what was contained in that agreement? What parts were good and what parts were bad? Please outline your stance. I would love to get a perspective of how a simpleton interprets that agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Tell us ol' childish wise one, what was contained in that agreement? What parts were good and what parts were bad? Please outline your stance. I would love to get a perspective of how a simpleton interprets that agreement.

Funny (not comical) how everything Trump implemented and Biden reversed has blown up in his face. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2021 at 1:49 PM, InMAGAWeTrust said:

I’m serious brother, we need another trump Taliban peace treaty 

 

On 8/25/2021 at 2:43 PM, Englebert said:

Tell us ol' childish wise one, what was contained in that agreement? What parts were good and what parts were bad? Please outline your stance. I would love to get a perspective of how a simpleton interprets that agreement.

Did the cat get your tongue? You've ran your mouth plenty on here, calling everyone stupid childish names, but you run like a frightened schoolgirl when challenged to explain your post. Why is this? Is this characteristic of someone possessing superior intellect than other board members? You act like Biden...refuse to answer questions by running off the stage. It seems to be a pattern both of you rely on.

How funny will it look when you spout off on another topic, calling everyone "stupid", when you have this post hanging over your head. And there are plenty of other posts in which when challenged, you ran away. Since this is your standard way of operating, should we challenge you to explain your next post (in which you will run)? Or should we resort to name calling (in which you are incompetent and in Biden fashion, try to deflect blame on someone else for ruining the topic)? Or should we ignore you and let you talk to yourself. The third option seems to be the best...but that's no fun. I'll choose the first, then dive down into the gutter when you choose the second. What do you think? Am I right?

So...do you wish to explain your position on the Trump Taliban treaty? The questions I previously asked are quoted so you won't have to scroll back up. Here's your second chance to save face (I laughed at myself while typing that). I'm guessing you will respond with the second option. Since this response contains more than two sentences, will you continue to try the "I didn't read your post" defense? Let's see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Can you imagine if the Finals were on TNT? SVG and Reggie would still be defending Kyrie and Luka after 3 straight bad games on the defensive end. That best backcourt of all-time thing got hushed up real quick by the C's thankfully. 
    • And before all of y’all start yelling “shall not be infringed,” who wants to argue that the 2A rights of ex-convicts are being infringed? My guess is that there are tons of people/places in which you don’t mind a few restrictions. 
    • I honestly thought they had quit before that last run in Game 3.  Saw 83 percent of betting public was on Dallas before the series started.  That blew my mind.  Goes to show you that most casual basketball fans only pay attention to offense and scoring.  Got so sick of hearing the Mavs have the best 2 players in the series (although Luka being the best is probably a given).  But when your two “stars” are easily the worst two defenders of the 10 starters in the game, you’ve got problem.  Defense winning championships is still a thing. 
    • Yeah… as a strong 2A supporter and AR owner, bump stocks shouldn’t be available. In a perfect world manufacturers would recognize that these parts serve no valuable purpose other than indiscriminately firing rounds into a general area and refuse to manufacture them. But as always, the gun lobby will skip right over the prudent thing and stand on an indefensible position, making the sane 2A supporters looking like slack-jawed morons, too.    We shouldn’t need a bumpstock ban… we (gun owners) should demand that these things not be produced.    I remember watching clips from Las Vegas the morning after and saying, “holy____… that’s actually full auto!”    if the weapon bucking is the force applying pressure on the trigger, there’s no chance of aiming.  It’s all about spraying a crowd down with 5.56 rounds.  The next time somebody goes on a rampage with a bump stock, ALL of us are guilty for not keeping the things off of the street. 
    • Agreed.  And with a disclaimer that I don’t know ANY inside info on this one, I can tell you that my OF peeps are BIG mad over this one.  Doesn’t seem shocking to me at all, seems like a no brainer from a coaching standpoint.  But it seems some think there is more involved here internally in Bobcat country.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...