Jump to content

Lumberton@Vidor


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

vidor played a very good nederland team.....with some very good refs that were making very good calls......except the 3 tds for vidor that got called back.....o and on a punt a it hit ned player inside 5 and vidor picked it up and ran in and ref spotted it on the inch line.....then vidor tackled ned for saftey but refs refuse to give vidor the points and spotted it on ince again....so this is no pushover vidor team.....will be a very good game.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest vidorpride

vidor played a very good nederland team.....with some very good refs that were making very good calls......except the 3 tds for vidor that got called back.....o and on a punt a it hit ned player inside 5 and vidor picked it up and ran in and ref spotted it on the inch line.....then vidor tackled ned for saftey but refs refuse to give vidor the points and spotted it on ince again....so this is no pushover vidor team.....will be a very good game.....

1 td was called back not 3, the punt did not hit a ned player, and vidor did not run the ball in, he downed it at the 1yd line or so.  He just grabbed the ball and threw it down and kept running into the end zone.  I will agree with the safety though.

Vidor had no intensity and still has no passing game.  That is why they lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 td was called back not 3, the punt did not hit a ned player, and vidor did not run the ball in, he downed it at the 1yd line or so.  He just grabbed the ball and threw it down and kept running into the end zone.  I will agree with the safety though.

Vidor had no intensity and still has no passing game.  That is why they lost.

Good post vidorpride. You pretty much summed it up objectively. I was going to respond to Vpiratefan2007, but you pretty much summed it up and accurately. I will say this though, y'all DID get screwed out of a safety. I have no idea how that wasn't a safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest vidorpride

I just hate when people make excuses for poor performance.  Execute the plays, play with intensity(like you actually want to win the game), dominate the other team, and the rest will fall into place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vidors offense needs to get rolling and the 3 year lettermen on this team need to step up be leaders and make plays. Take the lead from Pillsbury and when you walk off that field know you played with some heart and you could beat a very good lumberton team. Play emotionless like you did against ned and the results will be the same. With emotion I am going with VIDOR 24 L-TOWN 21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...