stevenash Posted February 12, 2019 Report Posted February 12, 2019 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Reagan 1 Quote
UT alum Posted February 12, 2019 Report Posted February 12, 2019 On 2/12/2019 at 6:59 PM, stevenash said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Expand May not get him, but a slew of them right in there with him are gonna be in hot water. That’s what a good con does -his subordinates take the flak while his lawyers keep him clean. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 12, 2019 Report Posted February 12, 2019 On 2/12/2019 at 8:29 PM, UT alum said: May not get him, but a slew of them right in there with him are gonna be in hot water. That’s what a good con does -his subordinates take the flak while his lawyers keep him clean. Expand What con did he pull? Surely he’s not smart enough to fool the righteous folks going after him. Quote
stevenash Posted February 13, 2019 Author Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/12/2019 at 8:29 PM, UT alum said: May not get him, but a slew of them right in there with him are gonna be in hot water. That’s what a good con does -his subordinates take the flak while his lawyers keep him clean. Expand and none of it will be related to collusion Quote
UT alum Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 2:09 AM, stevenash said: and none of it will be related to collusion Expand What will it be related to then? Quote
stevenash Posted February 13, 2019 Author Report Posted February 13, 2019 Financial misdealings or proving that someone said red when the tape said they said blue. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 2:58 AM, UT alum said: What will it be related to then? Expand Do you watch any news at all? Quote
UT alum Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 4:05 AM, LumRaiderFan said: Do you watch any news at all? Expand Yeah, more than one channel, too. Read newspapers, as well. What’s your point? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 4:10 AM, UT alum said: Yeah, more than one channel, too. Read newspapers, as well. What’s your point? Expand You seem to think the investigation is still about collusion when even Democrats know it isn’t anymore, you don’t seem to be aware of the Muslim issues in Europe that they are acknowledging. Don’t care how many channels you watch, lol, but whichever ones you are watching seem to keep you ignorant of what’s going on. By your one channel shot I’m guessing you’re in the hate Fox crowd without even knowing why. Try it, at least you’ll maybe figure out the collusion investigation is nonsense. Hagar 1 Quote
UT alum Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 4:21 AM, LumRaiderFan said: You seem to think the investigation is still about collusion when even Democrats know it isn’t anymore, you don’t seem to be aware of the Muslim issues in Europe that they are acknowledging. Don’t care how many channels you watch, lol, but whichever ones you are watching seem to keep you ignorant of what’s going on. By your one channel shot I’m guessing you’re in the hate Fox crowd without even knowing why. Try it, at least you’ll maybe figure out the collusion investigation is nonsense. Expand News reference is because 90% of the links I see on here are foxnews links. Quote
stevenash Posted February 13, 2019 Author Report Posted February 13, 2019 Bottom line ( even though you will never acknowledge) is Trump DID NOT collude with the Russians and the election results are legitimate. There are no spin possibilities left and the only "believers" are the Trump haters Quote
UT alum Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 1:09 PM, stevenash said: Bottom line ( even though you will never acknowledge) is Trump DID NOT collude with the Russians and the election results are legitimate. There are no spin possibilities left and the only "believers" are the Trump haters Expand Did I miss the release of the final report? Quote
Reagan Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 1:30 PM, UT alum said: Did I miss the release of the final report? Expand This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
UT alum Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 2:22 PM, Reagan said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Expand One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 2:32 PM, UT alum said: One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released. Expand This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
UT alum Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 2:38 PM, LumRaiderFan said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Expand You got that right, bro. Quote
stevenash Posted February 13, 2019 Author Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 2:32 PM, UT alum said: One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released. Expand Do you think it will ever be released? Two years not long enough? Of course the Mueller report will report a "different" conclusion. But I suspect that it will not implicate Trump in colluding with the Russians. Please state to me that you believe that Trump was a willing participant in colluding with the Russians to rig the election. Quote
UT alum Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 3:22 PM, stevenash said: Do you think it will ever be released? Two years not long enough? Of course the Mueller report will report a "different" conclusion. But I suspect that it will not implicate Trump in colluding with the Russians. Please state to me that you believe that Trump was a willing participant in colluding with the Russians to rig the election. Expand What's willing got to do with it? Influencing and rigging are two different things. Quote
Reagan Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 2:32 PM, UT alum said: One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released. Expand The mere fact it's been 2 years and Mueller has NOTHING! If he did, we would have heard about it. Second: The mere fact Mueller has to stage these side shows (Ex; Roger Stone's early morning harassment) also indicates he has NOTHING! So -- after a lot of wasted tax dollars -- he still has NOTHING! It's only a matter of time! Quote
UT alum Posted February 13, 2019 Report Posted February 13, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 4:21 PM, Reagan said: The mere fact it's been 2 years and Mueller has NOTHING! If he did, we would have heard about it. Second: The mere fact Mueller has to stage these side shows (Ex; Roger Stone's early morning harassment) also indicates he has NOTHING! So -- after a lot of wasted tax dollars -- he still has NOTHING! It's only a matter of time! Expand How do you know what he has? If it was nothing, it would be over. You must be confusing this investigation with Benghazi. Quote
stevenash Posted February 13, 2019 Author Report Posted February 13, 2019 If he has nothing, it will NEVER be over. As for Benghazi, are you referring to the situation where a certain administration did its dead level best to convince the public ( around election time, of course) that the attack was the result of an internet video? baddog 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 14, 2019 Report Posted February 14, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 5:06 PM, UT alum said: How do you know what he has? If it was nothing, it would be over. You must be confusing this investigation with Benghazi. Expand To compare this to Benghazi shows how clueless you are about both situations. Quote
UT alum Posted February 14, 2019 Report Posted February 14, 2019 On 2/14/2019 at 1:38 AM, LumRaiderFan said: To compare this to Benghazi shows how clueless you are about both situations. Expand Millions of wasted tax dollars. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 14, 2019 Report Posted February 14, 2019 On 2/14/2019 at 2:13 AM, UT alum said: Millions of wasted tax dollars. Expand Benghazi was a coverup...this latest is a witch-hunt that has proved nothing. Like I said, clueless. Quote
UT alum Posted February 14, 2019 Report Posted February 14, 2019 On 2/14/2019 at 2:25 AM, LumRaiderFan said: Benghazi was a coverup...this latest is a witch-hunt that has proved nothing. Like I said, clueless. Expand Like I said, millions of wasted tax dollars. Indictments? Convictions? Zero. A witch hunt that proved nothing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.