Jump to content

It's only a matter of time...


Hook'em

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

First off, does that law apply to abortion on demand or only if the life of the mother is in jeopardy? If it’s on demand I’ll bet dollars to donuts the Supreme Court will overturn it.

If so, only because Trump was elected.  Had Hillary won, I’d bet you a dollar to a doughnut that it wouldn’t be overturned.  She’d put two more on the SCOTUS that would vote just like RBG.

Oh, and you failed to address the Democrats in Authority in New York State & NYC allowing an 11 year old to perform lewd dances in a gay bar.  Does that mean you’re in agreement with me?  I hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2019 at 2:56 PM, PhatMack19 said:

This is in the United States of America...

 

11 yr old “drag kid” dances at adult gay club as Patrons toss money at “him”

 

This is the hidden content, please

 

This is the hidden content, please

Drag really isn't about anything sexual, they get tips for how they lip sync. It's more like a pageant or a performance, then ones I've seen at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bobcat1 said:

Drag really isn't about anything sexual, they get tips for how they lip sync. It's more like a pageant or a performance, then ones I've seen at least. 

Putting lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig. The little boy dancing in a dress in front of grown men while they toss money at him is sexual in itself.  I'm sorry, but you can't clean this one up. I'm sure you haven't seen any 11 year male child in Texas allowed to perform in this nature in a public establishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2019 at 7:23 AM, UT alum said:

Like when you play the Maddow card?

 

On 2/3/2019 at 8:01 AM, LumRaiderFan said:

I don’t remember playing the Maddow card but if I did, I could back up her and her network spewing lots of fake news. 

I have asked you to do the same for Rush and haven’t gotten an answer.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • To clarify, Dems love wars. They rage daily in the bluest of blue inner citicis. Chicago had 39 shootings over the weekend, 9 dead. Warzone. Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, etc. I am sure was just as bloody. The blue body count rises daily. I am sure the blue defunding of police and releasing murders without any bail have nothing to do with it. Right?   
    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...