Jump to content

11-4A

LOLZ

By LOLZ
in High School Football

 Share

District 11-4A Bridge City Huffman LCM Livingston Lumberton Splendora  

33 members have voted

  1. 1. Is there an easier district in all of 4a?

    • Yes
      11
    • No
      22

Recommended Posts

Tiger33

Tiger33

Posted
Posted
  On 10/3/2018 at 3:23 PM, L-Train11 said:

Well let’s just say the only thing Silsbee could do was throw the deep ball. They had 3 deep td passes, and one screen pass that went for a td with a questionable blocking in the back on our safety.

so we are vulnerable deep, but I think that’s because we were so focused on their run game because they hadn’t really thrown much all year.

Expand  

Well I can tell you  Huffman will throw a lot more then us and they may give y’all problems in that air Raid offense they have. 

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

CardinalBacker
CardinalBacker

I think this district is an insult to high school football and should be ignored. 

Tiger33
Tiger33

12-4a has 4 wins so far and I highly doubt their any stronger than us. Lumberton is about to play Houston Furr and I think that will show how strong that district is. LCM has played 3 state ranked tea

scat_trap
scat_trap

I can't wait to watch some of the toothless dog fights that are going to happen during these games.  I've got my popcorn ready.

L-Train11

L-Train11

Posted
Posted
  On 10/3/2018 at 3:25 PM, LC-M said:

Well I can tell you  Huffman will throw a lot more then us and they may give y’all problems in that air Raid offense they have. 

Expand  

That’s fine because we’ll have film on them. After watching 2 of the 3 Silsbee games before us I can tell you that their passing game was really nonexistent so we didn’t have anything to go off of.

But pass defense always seems to be our weakness. We don’t really have the speed.

Tiger33

Tiger33

Posted
Posted
  On 10/3/2018 at 3:28 PM, Raiders94 said:

Yeah but I don't think they have 6'2" receivers with 40" verticals lol

Expand  

No it’s not that. They just run a bunch of routes and always end up with a open receiver 40 yards down field lol hey y’all might do better with them. They have our number. If y’all can forced them to run the ball y’all win the game

Raiders94

Raiders94

Posted
Posted
  On 10/3/2018 at 3:31 PM, LC-M said:

No it’s not that. They just run a bunch of routes and always end up with a open receiver 40 yards down field lol hey y’all might do better with them. They have our number. If y’all can forced them to run the ball y’all win the game

Expand  

I don't think the Qb will have enough time to find an open receiver, I've seen film on them. lol 

Tiger33

Tiger33

Posted
Posted
  On 10/3/2018 at 3:33 PM, Raiders94 said:

I don't think the Qb will have enough time to find an open receiver, I've seen film on them. lol 

Expand  

I have not seen any film on them. But ill say this they are kinda like LCM and run the same offensive plays over and over again through the past years. I thought it was funny Kogt did a report at the start of the season and our head coach said yall were in the wing t he must not have seen any film on yall lol

L-Train11

L-Train11

Posted
Posted
  On 10/3/2018 at 3:36 PM, LC-M said:

I have not seen any film on them. But ill say this they are kinda like LCM and run the same offensive plays over and over again through the past years. I thought it was funny Kogt did a report at the start of the season and our head coach said yall were in the wing t he must not have seen any film on yall lol

Expand  

In his defense we did shift to the wing t on some plays, tried to switch things up some and keep people guessing. We found out in scrimmage that our wing t looked like garbage so we canned it.

Huffman Hargrave Falcons72

Huffman Hargrave Falcons72

Posted
Posted
  On 10/3/2018 at 3:33 PM, Raiders94 said:

I don't think the Qb will have enough time to find an open receiver, I've seen film on them. lol 

Expand  

Lol you are probably right.. Honestly we should be 5-0 or at least 4-1, but our O cant stay on the field at crucial moments in games.. I've seen Lumberton in person and on film, and looks like it will be a good game with plenty of mistakes on both sides... 

Raiders94

Raiders94

Posted
Posted
  On 10/3/2018 at 4:29 PM, STiger85 said:

Oh please, don’t flatter yourself. Silsbee had 200+ yards passing and 100+ yards rushing, one player had 100 yards rushing on Lumberton. 

Expand  

If you had read my post completely you would have seen that I said THINK, meaning I wasn't sure. 

BananaPants

BananaPants

Posted
Posted

Splendora 4-1

Huffman 2-3 

Lumberton 2-3

BC - 1-4*

LCM 1-4*

Livingston 0-5

*Played actual football teams (Jasper 5-0,Woodville 4-0, Diboll, 4-0 Vidor 3-1 (Lost to Crosby), Silsbee, and WOS)

10-20 as a district

CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
  On 10/5/2018 at 1:57 PM, BananaPants said:

Splendora 4-1

Huffman 2-3 

Lumberton 2-3

BC - 1-4*

LCM 1-4*

Livingston 0-5

*Played actual football teams (Jasper 5-0,Woodville 4-0, Diboll, 4-0 Vidor 3-1 (Lost to Crosby), Silsbee, and WOS)

10-20 as a district

Expand  

Yeah.... I'd feel a lot better if BC or LCM had been competitive in those games.  4/5 will get sorted out next week when LiCk'eM travels to BC.  It's pretty much a "loser goes home" game regarding the playoff IMO.

VP93....

VP93....

Posted
Posted
  On 10/5/2018 at 2:29 PM, CardinalBacker said:

Yeah.... I'd feel a lot better if BC or LCM had been competitive in those games.  4/5 will get sorted out next week when LiCk'eM travels to BC.  It's pretty much a "loser goes home" game regarding the playoff IMO.

Expand  

Jasper 5-0 but really have they played anyone. Talk about easy non-district. 

Date Opponent Result
8/317:00p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Touchdowns Against Cancer Games
9/77:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
9/147:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Little Cypress Mauriceville High School, Football
This is the hidden content, please
9/217:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Jasper High School, Football Stadium
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
9/287:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

I mean can’t get any easier than that!! So you can’t put them in the mix of “actual” football teams yet!!  But let’s not forget Lumberton played Jasper, Silsbee and I would bet Concordia would give most teams in this area fits. Not saying they had a great non-distict Schdule. Just stating the facts. 

CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
  On 10/5/2018 at 2:54 PM, VP93.... said:

Jasper 5-0 but really have they played anyone. Talk about easy non-district. 

Date Opponent Result
8/317:00p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Touchdowns Against Cancer Games
9/77:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
9/147:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Little Cypress Mauriceville High School, Football
This is the hidden content, please
9/217:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
Jasper High School, Football Stadium
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
9/287:30p
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

I mean can’t get any easier than that!! So you can’t put them in the mix of “actual” football teams yet!!  But let’s not forget Lumberton played Jasper, Silsbee and I would bet Concordia would give most teams in this area fits. Not saying they had a great non-distict Schdule. Just stating the facts. 

Expand  

You make a good point....

ya_know

ya_know

Posted
Posted
  On 10/5/2018 at 2:29 PM, CardinalBacker said:

Yeah.... I'd feel a lot better if BC or LCM had been competitive in those games.  4/5 will get sorted out next week when LiCk'eM travels to BC.  It's pretty much a "loser goes home" game regarding the playoff IMO.

Expand  

I have to agree with CardinalBacker, if the games would have been competitive then it would mean a lot more.  I still think a lot could happen in this district.  Huffman and Lumberton seem injury prone.  Splendora is a mystery to me.  They put up points and give up a lot of points.  BC and LCM could surprise some people, especially if LCM gets their QB back.  This district is wide open.

Huffman Hargrave Falcons72

Huffman Hargrave Falcons72

Posted
Posted

As of right now

1. Splendora 

2. Lumberton 

3. Huffman

4. Lcm

5. B.C.

6. Livingston 

Now what happens this week coming up will determine a lot.  If Huffman can put their BIG boy pants on for once and beat Lumberton,  I think we will win district.. But I'm very optimistic because I see the talent and what could be from this team.. Just we make alot of mistakes, and also See to many players, what looks like to me that are scared of full contact.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ben broussard
    Newest Member
    ben broussard
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...