Jump to content

Is This Necessary?


Englebert

Recommended Posts

When I say is this necessary, I mean do I need to know the sexual orientation of a superhero? If my house is burning down, do I need to know the sexual orientation of the fireman saving my house? If I'm drowning, do I need to know the sexual orientation of my rescuer? If I'm watching an action movie, do I need to know the sexual orientation of the hero? So my question is, why does Hollywood think I need to know the sexual orientation of a superhero? Is her preference pertinent to the plot of the movie? If so, fine. But an action movie in which sex scenes are 99.9% of the time gratuitous. I grew up not knowing the sexual orientation of any superhero, much less any hero. Why does Hollywood find the need to force this down my throat?

This is the hidden content, please

I have no problem with the sexual orientation of the character or the sexual orientation of the actor. My question is, why am I forced to know? And related to a recent topic on here, is the motivation for this revelation a product of general information, or is it injected as a sole purpose of pissing off a certain group of people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Englebert said:

When I say is this necessary, I mean do I need to know the sexual orientation of a superhero? If my house is burning down, do I need to know the sexual orientation of the fireman saving my house? If I'm drowning, do I need to know the sexual orientation of my rescuer? If I'm watching an action movie, do I need to know the sexual orientation of the hero? So my question is, why does Hollywood think I need to know the sexual orientation of a superhero? Is her preference pertinent to the plot of the movie? If so, fine. But an action movie in which sex scenes are 99.9% of the time gratuitous. I grew up not knowing the sexual orientation of any superhero, much less any hero. Why does Hollywood find the need to force this down my throat?

This is the hidden content, please

I have no problem with the sexual orientation of the character or the sexual orientation of the actor. My question is, why am I forced to know? And related to a recent topic on here, is the motivation for this revelation a product of general information, or is it injected as a sole purpose of pissing off a certain group of people?

That’s a durn good question.  My guess, it has a twofold purposes.  First, it gives all the liberals a warm & fuzzy feeling of how inclusive they are.  And Second, it pisses off a certain group of people.

My Dad worked a short time in the circus when he was 10 (his Dad had died).   He told me stories about geeks, in a cage, biting the heads off of chickens.  A regular freak show.  You know, when I see most of these Leftist groups in their costumes, and vagina’s on their heads, I think about those geeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm...i have a female cousin who is gay. She says that the thought of being with a man makes her ill. I am an avid reader, I am having a hard time finding books that don't have gay couples. I am not gay, I can't relate, so I don't want to read about it. I don't know if that makes me insensitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big girl said:

Hmmmm...i have a female cousin who is gay. She says that the thought of being with a man makes her ill. I am an avid reader, I am having a hard time finding books that don't have gay couples. I am not gay, I can't relate, so I don't want to read about it. I don't know if that makes me insensitive.

You are also NOT Big Girl.

I have a gay cousin also. Does that make me special? She doesn't flaunt it in people's face. She also doesn't say, “Hi, I'm Jane and I'm gay.” We have come to a crossroad in this country where libs are saying let it all hang out. Even freedom has its limitations, don't you think? I feel that if someone thinks they can flaunt homosexuality in front of me, especially on national tv, and I don't like it, I have every right in the world to be insensitive. I cannot be put on a guilt trip for not denying my true feelings.

I stand by my earlier post. What country could be more easily defeated than fairyland?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, baddog said:

You are also NOT Big Girl.

I have a gay cousin also. Does that make me special? She doesn't flaunt it in people's face. She also doesn't say, “Hi, I'm Jane and I'm gay.” We have come to a crossroad in this country where libs are saying let it all hang out. Even freedom has its limitations, don't you think? I feel that if someone thinks they can flaunt homosexuality in front of me, especially on national tv, and I don't like it, I have every right in the world to be insensitive. I cannot be put on a guilt trip for not denying my true feelings.

I stand by my earlier post. What country could be more easily defeated than fairyland?

Tt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • To clarify, Dems love wars. They rage daily in the bluest of blue inner citicis. Chicago had 39 shootings over the weekend, 9 dead. Warzone. Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, etc. I am sure was just as bloody. The blue body count rises daily. I am sure the blue defunding of police and releasing murders without any bail have nothing to do with it. Right?   
    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...