Jump to content

Some Government Operations...

baddog

By baddog
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted

.......need to be covert and not leaked.....for the good of the country. Remember, Kennedy was a Democrat and the last one to have a pair. He had secret talks with Kruschev. All of this is declassified so it's ok to read it...lol

I lived through this and it was terrifying. Drills in school placed us in hallways sitting Indian style with our heads bent down......I guess to kiss our arse goodbye.

This is the hidden content, please

P.S.   Why aren't the libs upset about Hillary dealing with the Russians and selling them 20% of our uranium? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, baddog said:

.......need to be covert and not leaked.....for the good of the country. Remember, Kennedy was a Democrat and the last one to have a pair. He had secret talks with Kruschev. All of this is declassified so it's ok to read it...lol

I lived through this and it was terrifying. Drills in school placed us in hallways sitting Indian style with our heads bent down......I guess to kiss our arse goodbye.

This is the hidden content, please

P.S.   Why aren't the libs upset about Hillary dealing with the Russians and selling them 20% of our uranium? 

Like Hussein, they think crooked Hillary does no wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Clinton didn't sell uranium.  A committee of 9 agency heads had to approve that deal.  She couldn't approve or veto the deal     

From the New York Times:

This is the hidden content, please

Do you think Clinton had any persuasive influence over anyone making the decision? Frankly, I don't know. But it is sure highly coincidental that the cash flowed into the Clinton Foundation from the Russians during this oversight decision. I would also like to know if any of the other department heads received "charitable" contributions during this time, either from the Russians or from the Clinton Foundation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
  • Author
Posted
24 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Clinton didn't sell uranium.  A committee of 9 agency heads had to approve that deal.  She couldn't approve or veto the deal     

9 stockholders from a Canadian company and a deal with the Russians for $145 million. You like to split hairs because that's all you got.....casting doubt. Read this.

 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
westend1

westend1

Posted
Posted

It's not splitting hairs.  She could not approve the deal.  She wasn't even the chairman of the committee.   But, since it doesn't fit your narrative, you ignore those facts.  Btw.     It wasn't 20 percent of u s stockpile.   It was 20 percent of future production and Russia had legally the company that owned the rights

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
  • Author
Posted
33 minutes ago, westend1 said:

It's not splitting hairs.  She could not approve the deal.  She wasn't even the chairman of the committee.   But, since it doesn't fit your narrative, you ignore those facts.  Btw.     It wasn't 20 percent of u s stockpile.   It was 20 percent of future production and Russia had legally the company that owned the rights

Oh well, excuse the shat out of me. That makes it ok. I have no agenda except to the true Americans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, westend1 said:

It's not splitting hairs.  She could not approve the deal.  She wasn't even the chairman of the committee.   But, since it doesn't fit your narrative, you ignore those facts.  Btw.     It wasn't 20 percent of u s stockpile.   It was 20 percent of future production and Russia had legally the company that owned the rights

But Trump should be able to repeal and replace obamacare by himself, without ANY help, or he's a liar, right?

Talk about ignoring facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
77

77

Posted
Posted

a bunch of those republicans are as upset as the dems about Trump being there because they know he is out to screw up their rein of sponging off the American taxpayers staying in office for 30 and 40 years lining their pockets . Drain the swamp on both sides!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
westend1

westend1

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, 77 said:

a bunch of those republicans are as upset as the dems about Trump being there because they know he is out to screw up their rein of sponging off the American taxpayers staying in office for 30 and 40 years lining their pockets . Drain the swamp on both sides!

Trump said  if you can't make a deal with politicians the you aren't very good at it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
westend1

westend1

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I agree...only problem is that many of the Republicans like big gov and have no problem with obamacare.

Been talking about repealing obamacare for 7 years and won't do when they get the chance.

Heck.  Didn't they vote to repeal it like 15 times over the past seven years?   Why the change now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Heck.  Didn't they vote to repeal it like 15 times over the past seven years?   Why the change now?

They added a rider of replace to the repeal bill. That's the difference and that's why it failed, and thankfully so. They need to just repeal the thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Heck.  Didn't they vote to repeal it like 15 times over the past seven years?   Why the change now?

Because they are actually in charge now and don't want to rock the boat and risk losing seats...my best guess.

Democrats love to be in power and have the big stick...Republicans don't.

If they forged ahead and repealed obamacare without any replacement, I think the exact opposite would happen...more Democrats would lose seats.

We simply have a shortage of conservative Republicans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The whole point of this thread was to show how Kennedy had a straight line to Kruschev without any tapping or leaked info. His covert conversations were acceptable.

Trump and some of his aides have conversations with the Russians and they should all be castrated and exiled.

Hillary receives $millions from the Russians for clandestine operations and she is hailed as a saviour. 

Now, the Russians are buddies with Iran. 

We need to have an understanding with our enemies. What was so wrong with Flynn and Sessions...or Tillerson for that matter? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, westend1 said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

More stories that this author has written...LOL...LOL.

 

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
westend1

westend1

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

 

More stories that this author has written...LOL...LOL.

 

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

 

So, the story about the uranium is wrong?    You can find the same thing on any reputable site you want to choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 1970
      It's a great day in SETX!

      By 1970 · Posted

      What the writer stated wrt crossover votes in the primary/runoff: "Covey and his supporters Paxton and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said Phelan only won because Democrats crossed over to vote in the Republican Primary for him. Paxton said Covey’s campaign identified “at least” 1,442 Democrats who voted early in Jefferson County in the primary runoff. Texas does not have party registration, but a voter’s primary voting history is public. The Covey campaign has not released its methodology behind its claim, but  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  by The Texan news website found that 9% of Republican voters in the March District 21 primary had voted in one of the previous four Democratic primaries. However, only 5% of that group had voted in all four previous Democratic primaries. What Phelan’s opponents did not mention is historically Democratic Jefferson County is undergoing a political transition towards the Republican party — the county judge switched his affiliation to the GOP in 2017 — so many residents have a mixed primary voting history. And Phelan’s allies in the House dismissed the idea that liberals swung the election. "I knocked on doors, hundreds and hundreds of doors, made calls for Dade,” Republican Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, said on Mark Davis’ radio program Wednesday. “I did not speak to a single Democrat down here in HD21. Not a single one." "  
    • 1970
      Will Biden Be The Democratic Nominee For President?

      By 1970 · Posted

      He's with it enough to do what he's told, beginning day 1 when he signed the order to revoke the Keystone Pipeline project.  But more recently, he's protecting the DOJ, as well as himself ...  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

    • Big girl
      Will Biden Be The Democratic Nominee For President?

      By Big girl · Posted

      Most 75-80 year Olds have some type of cognitive impairment. If you are asking if Biden has dementia then my answer is no. That is a Republican talking point. If you all think he has dementia what type do you think he has?
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      A lot better showing from the Ags tonight!   Bring on Oregon 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...