Jump to content

2016 SETXsports High School Football Rankings - Preseason


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

4 pollsters had Newton over Silsbee.  There was one ballot that did not have Silsbee (which I still think was a simple oversight).

Noticed that as well. 5 pollsters had Silsbee above Newton but the one poll that left Silsbee completely off kept them from being #3 and Newton #4. All 9 of the other pollsters had Silsbee top 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

Do you thin they really open up the playbook? Or aren't trying out people in different positions? 

Opened up the playbook? No. Trying people out in different positions? This is a team that brought back 10 starters on defense and 8-10 on offense. They have no reason to do that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, purpleeagle said:

eaglewoodville#1, you said Woodville should be above Crockett. In your scrimmage report you said "I wasn't at the scrimmage ,I  just heard the score".

I never stated they should be above Crockett. I simply said they outplayed them. Crockett is still a very good team and deserves this ranking. I wasn't taking any thing away from them. Only vouch in for my team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...