Jump to content

#20 John Tyler "Cujo" Lions vs Plano West Blue Wolves


cujoforlife02

Recommended Posts

This is the first time these two schools have played each other. It is save to say i know nothing about this team. The from looking on other sites throughout the summer is that Plano West is going to have a down year. Only time well tell. 

However, John Tyler is comong off 8-4 season and has moved back up to 6a. JT is looking to continue the success today had in 5A. 

This game will be at Rose Stadium at 12 noon on Saturday the 27th.


Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well my honest take on the scrimmage was JT indeed has a little work to do defensively. We stopped any runs up the middle but Nac found light running to the left side (if you're watching from behind the defense). I'm not sure if the linebackers were too bunched in or if Nac's o-line was really that good. FYI, both of our starting DE's did not play and this 3-4 look is completely new to our guys but we ran the 3-4 all night. No stunts or blitzes, which was to be expected. Secondary played well. Nac did complete a few deep balls but our coverage was there but their receivers made plays. We tackled extremely well. Especially open field. Nac had good speed. They had one guy break lose towards the end, and of course I dont know his name but it took us a while to catch him. Again, Nac exposed our outside linebackers. The secondary broke up pass after pass, 1st team and 2nd team. Now, here is the best part of the night. The offense (more explosive and high octane than last yr) basically picked up where it left off from last season, but much, much improved. Oh and we can actually run the ball more effective this year w/o having to rely on Bryson's legs too much. We have a stable of running backs this year. Let me start with the kid who is a transfer (not doing any naming as of right now on purpose). This guy was nothing short of amazing. He found holes even when there wasn't much of one. He loves contact and breaks through tackles with ease. He loves running up the middle and has great break away speed. Matter of fact, he broke a 65/70 yard run with contact and scored late in the scrimmage. I'm betting he had 150+ yards. He mostly played with the 2nd team. Oh, and he's a big back. Something we haven't had in a while. The next RB, who is the starter and the biggest of them all (played JV last year), just plowed over everybody all night. He's another one who loves contact and will be great in the redzone. He needs to learn to drop his pad level a little bit more but the guy is 4/5 yard per carry guy but doesn't have the speed of the 1st I mentioned. The last RB, who got plenty 1st team action is a mixture of the first 2. Not as big, but he's not small either and probably the fastest. This the first time iv'e seen JT loaded with backs like this since the Wilson era. But a great comparison would be the 2009 team, when we had the 2 man backfield of Black and Chancellor. Bryson was Bryson of course. He had a few huge runs. He definitely has more help this year. His accuracy is much improved over last season and looks to throw first vs running, but when he tucks that ball and takes off, just watch out. Our receiving core was great all night and didn't drop much. I was actually impressed with our slot receivers who ran great routes and catch very well. The O-line blocked really good and opened up huge holes. Oh and the interior d-lineman were impressive as well. If we tune up our outside backers (i'm sure we will) this team will be pretty descent. Offensively and defensively we have a shot. By no means will Nac be a pushover. I can't see them beating LP but they will score. Good luck to Nac the rest of the year and thanks for a clean scrimmage.

writen by the beast from the eas on smoaky.com. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...