Jump to content

Port Neches-Groves 2 Santa Fe 1/Gm2-Final/Gm 3 Postponed

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Baseball

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

NDNation
NDNation

PNG 2 SF 1 final. Rain delay on game 3. Way to dig in Indians! 

goldenlady
goldenlady

Congratulations PNG!!!

fox
fox

should of just went there last night to begin with.

TradenupBH

TradenupBH

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Coach85 said:

Would be a great series. If they agree on home and home this would get wild. Love to see it.

 

 

It would be a reunion. Lol

Good luck to ya'll!  Would love to see that matchup. We could sit in the outfield, drink some cold one's and talk crap to each other like fantasy football days. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Coach85

Coach85

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, TradenupBH said:

It would be a reunion. Lol

Good luck to ya'll!  Would love to see that matchup. We could sit in the outfield, drink some cold one's and talk crap to each other like fantasy football days. Lol

That would be a blast, would be just like the old days when y'all lived here. All in all that would be a great match up. But it will be a couple more weeks before this match-up could come about. I have a feeling it wouldn't be home and home either. It will be interesting where they decide to play it if it does happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhatMack19

PhatMack19

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, ShlyKBMT said:

What I'm told is that Carter wanted to move game 3 to Jasper tonight. Guessing Santa Fe didn't want to so they agreed on Pearland. They got all the way over there only for the bottom to fall out. Pretty sure there's no love lost between the two sides at this point lol. 

It seems like almost every other series in the area was able to be played last night except for this one.  Did Santa Fe coach stall so he could bring back his #1 on Monday? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tennisbc

tennisbc

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

It seems like almost every other series in the area was able to be played last night except for this one.  Did Santa Fe coach stall so he could bring back his #1 on Monday? 

Let's face it, not a bad move from a coaching view, may not be nice but in the playoffs you coach for a win sometimes anyway possible

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fox

fox

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, ShlyKBMT said:

PNG wants Jasper. Santa Fe wants Lamar or Livingston. I was next to LU AD when call came in and he's not sure if they'll have staff available on short notice. He said they'll try. I'd say Jasper is once again the best option.

why would PNG not want Lamar? Lamar is in his back yard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
2018 BB

2018 BB

Posted
Posted

Answered my own question.  Straight from UIL Post Season 2016 packet:

 

2. Inclement Weather: Every effort must be made by both teams to determine the winner before the certification deadline. This includes obtaining neutral sites and securing any available site. This could mean giving up a home field advantage if another site is playable. 2 If weather conditions make it impossible to determine a winner before certification, UIL must be contacted for an extension. The next round opponent(s) must also be contacted to inform them that the deadline will be extended. Extreme scheduling difficulties such as those mentioned above could result in a coin flip which would determine the representatives to the next round.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhatMack19

PhatMack19

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, CCRed said:

What if this game gets rained out ?  

I think that's why the set the start for 2pm, so they have some time for delays built in.  Jasper's field can be playable almost immediately after it stops raining so they may been in for a long day. 

 

The forecast now starts to look better after around 4pm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • BBfan061
      2024 Countdown to Kickoff

      By BBfan061 · Posted

      Tic tock 
    • Separation Scientist
      Dang "Erectionists"!

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      To clarify, Dems love wars. They rage daily in the bluest of blue inner citicis. Chicago had 39 shootings over the weekend, 9 dead. Warzone. Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, etc. I am sure was just as bloody. The blue body count rises daily. I am sure the blue defunding of police and releasing murders without any bail have nothing to do with it. Right?   
    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...