Jump to content

Smitty, Stevenash, Lumraider - Why Do You Hate Our Country?


Recommended Posts

If the procedure you list is correct, wouldnt following it be the most appropriate thing to do?  I am not against spending funds to help circumstances such as you described above.  At the same time, there is a lot of "help" given to circumstances that are NOT as you described above.  I am also against expanding the number of social programs as there is overlap in the current programs and once again, since they are operated by the Federal Government, they are hardly models of efficiency and accountability as  the VA debacle CLEARLY documents.  Isn't it odd that some VA patients are going to be given vouchers to go elsewhere for treatment?  Very ironic that the govt will now pay the private sector to handle things it cant handle.  From my perspective, this country already provides a plethora of govt assistance and we ought to be seeking ways to reduce rather 

than increase.

You never addressed the question. As far as the VA is concerned, my uncle get timely visits. So with any non-perfect system, there are always problems to fix. There was a time in America when people spoke out against our system, they were told , "Love It or Leave It." My how yall have changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very glad to hear your uncle gets timely visits Dove but it is beginning to appear that he might be an exception.  Obviously he is not one of those who died waiting for an appointment.  I would be willing to bet  your comment " So with any non-perfect system, there are always problems to fix" would not have been the same when the hurrican flooding hit New Orleans.  As for how times have changed, I agree,  But my viewpoint is that they have changed where society is encouraged to believe everyone is a victim and only the government can  make it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a simplified version of it, minus the drug testing of recipients of course. I am not against mandatory drug testing, but not for the reasons most of the uninformed masses are for it. If someone tests positive, there will be more required than to simply cut off their benefits. We will end up spending more money on that family than we would if there were not drugs involved. But the kids will get to eat, and the parent will either lose their kids and their benefits, or get the help they desperately need.

So, if you are for mandatory drug testing for anyone that receives taxpayer money, then one is an uninformed individual?  There should be NO stipulations and exceptions.   People in private industry are drug tested.   If you are on any form of welfare, you should be drug tested.  It is my understanding that when Florida went to drug testing for welfare, the welfare roles dropped tremendously.  Imagine that! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doesn't matter what crime he commits or how bad this POTUS runs this country into the ground....he will always have those prideful supporters......true stupidity. 

 

 

hey dove since you support this POTUS can you please have the coaches take some of your son's hard earned playing time and spread it among the other role players.....   thats only fair......how bout equal time for all players every game.....i mean in the end does it really matter....

It is spread among other role players. Hard work pays off in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if you are for mandatory drug testing for anyone that receives taxpayer money, then one is an uninformed individual? There should be NO stipulations and exceptions. People in private industry are drug tested. If you are on any form of welfare, you should be drug tested. It is my understanding that when Florida went to drug testing for welfare, the welfare roles dropped tremendously. Imagine that!


You really should slow down when you read. I'm not convinced you understand half of what you read. The response above to my post is evidence that you don't.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really should slow down when you read. I'm not convinced you understand half of what you read. The response above to my post is evidence that you don't.

That is a some-what response to your post.  I just used it as a lead-in to a statement of facts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...