another one for Bullets

[stevenash]

Do you remember when I jokingly asked you what you would think if some guy wanted to marry his horse? You suggested that was ridiculous and not worthy of discussing.

Check this out:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/woman-marries-dog-totally-b-h-article-1.1717772

[bullets13]

Obviously she's nuts. But I could care less. I'm more concerned about people getting the rights they deserve. Why didn't you post the link to the guy who wants to marry his goat?

[stevenash]

Then, if I am hearing you correctly, your acceptance of other peoples "rights" draws the line when it involves two human beings?

[bullets13]

Yup. I make a distinction between someone who wants to marry an animal and someone who is unable to get health insurance because of their sexual orientation.

[stevenash]

Yup- this "free" healthcare thing is really working out well, isn't it?

[bullets13]

Yup- this "free" healthcare thing is really working out well, isn't it?

I'm not a fan of Obamacare. It's also a different issue than what you and I are talking about on this thread.

[stevenash]

True.  Are you saying that people who are not straight are being denied healthcare purely for that reason?

[bullets13]

True. Are you saying that people who are not straight are being denied healthcare purely for that reason?

I'm saying that people who are not straight are unable to be added to their partner's healthcare for that reason.

[mat]

I'm saying that people who are not straight are unable to be added to their partner's healthcare for that reason.

Perhaps the problem is with Obamacare/healthcare qualifications rather than marriage laws.

[bullets13]

Perhaps the problem is with Obamacare/healthcare qualifications rather than marriage laws.

Perhaps there are two separate problems.

[NorthoftheBorder]

Perhaps there are two separate problems.

 

Obviously she's nuts. But I could care less. I'm more concerned about people getting the rights they deserve. Why didn't you post the link to the guy who wants to marry his goat?

Great dodge to the point that you didn't believe that the "evolution" of human behavoir that is happening rapidly before our eyes would continue to slide down the slippery slope of moral decay and would lead to such crazyness!!!

[bullets13]

There has always been craziness. Used to when a guy was banging his horse in the sticks, it wasn't plastered all over the Internet. Stuff like this isn't anything new.

[stevenash]

There has always been craziness. Used to when a guy was banging his horse in the sticks, it wasn't plastered all over the Internet. Stuff like this isn't anything new.

But marrying the horse IS new.

[bullets13]

they've been doing so in different parts of the world for several years now. 

[new tobie]

Looks like your behind the times Nash, esp with news that doesn't involve Obama!

[NorthoftheBorder]

they've been doing so in different parts of the world for several years now. 

Ding ding ding!!!  i wonder why???

[stevenash]

they've been doing so in different parts of the world for several years now.

Sorry, but "several years" is quite new in the greater scheme of things

[westend1]

Don't care if some guy/girl marries their horse.  You holy rollers don't want them having sex out of wedlock, do you?

[bullets13]

Sorry, but "several years" is quite new in the greater scheme of things

But it came before the movement for allowing gay marriage. So the movement for gay marriage is not "responsible" for these crazies who love their animals.

[stevenash]

Holy rollers? Does that mean if one believes in God, he/she is a Holy Roller? I thought your party was the party of diversity and tolerance? And yet you try to disparage those who don't have the same beliefs and values as you? Could one consider that to be hypocritical? ( I know, I know- only the right practices hyprocisy)

[stevenash]

But it came before the movement for allowing gay marriage. So the movement for gay marriage is not "responsible" for these crazies who love their animals.

I have no interest in whether or not marrying an animal surfaced before the gay marriage movement. One can carry things too far whether it be of a fiscal nature or social nature

[westend1]

Holy rollers? Does that mean if one believes in God, he/she is a Holy Roller? I thought your party was the party of diversity and tolerance? And yet you try to disparage those who don't have the same beliefs and values as you? Could one consider that to be hypocritical? ( I know, I know- only the right practices hyprocisy)

I tolerate your stupidity.  I just point it out from time to time.

[NorthoftheBorder]

But it came before the movement for allowing gay marriage. So the movement for gay marriage is not "responsible" for these crazies who love their animals.

It would have had to come before the early 1990's.  That is when the very overt push came to change the debate and push for gay marriage by turning it into a civil rights issue!!

[NorthoftheBorder]

I tolerate your stupidity.  I just point it out from time to time.

When you lose the argument you always turn to name calling and insults!! You remind me of sister soulja!!  And tolerant of the others and their views you are not!!!

[LumRaiderFan]

When you lose the argument you always turn to name calling and insults!! You remind me of sister soulja!! And tolerant of the others and their views you are not!!!

Ignore him guys...he adds nothing to the debate and will probably be booted again soon anyway.