Jump to content

UT alum

Members
  • Posts

    2,804
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by UT alum

  1. Nobody’s scared of a second rate two bit criminal. That kind of a morally bankrupt individual should not be leading or anywhere near any leadership position in the greatest democracy on earth. Go ahead and give the stock reply, trumpers. NO ONE NEEDS IMMUNITY IF NOTHING WRONG HAS BEEN DONE OR WITNESSED. Can that just not penetrate your mind?
  2. I don’t know that it’s been reported he’s explicitly flipped, but why would he need immunity if he wasn’t going to talk about things done with the defendant’s knowledge or consent if it was all legal? That’s a pretty strong indicator that he’s cooperating with the prosecution. I have no idea what evidence Meadows has, but a couple of other witnesses have said he was closely involved in the activities described in the indictments filed in both investigations.
  3. Meadows was offered immunity for testimony in documents case and January 6 case. Are you saying that is fake reporting? Meadows was held in contempt of Congress for ignoring a supbpoena to testify in the second impeachment trial. Are you saying that is a lie? If there was nothing to turn on, why would he, or any other witness but especially he - the closest person to him on a day to day basis by job description - need immunity? That’s not fake news. That’s what they call logic. I’m not relying on anyone else’s opinion. I’m taking facts recorded in the public record and drawing my own conclusions. You oughtta try it. It’s a lot more productive than listening to someone else tell me whatvthey think about it. I can think for myself. At the end of the day, I’ll be proved either right or wrong.
  4. Whatever does that have to do with grand jury testimony or immunity?
  5. He who laughs last…
  6. The only accountability he has faced is in a political court. Impeachment and Senate trial. Partial jurors. Supermajority required for conviction. That’s nothing even remotely similar to a jury trial. He’s not got yet, but all signs point towards GUILTY.
  7. I told ya’ll Meadows would be the key to Trump’s demise. He got immunity for his testimony before he even got charged with anything. Already testified three times before a federal grand jury. When the Consigliere or the Underboss flips, the Don is done. Sammy Gravano and John Gotti ring a bell? Trump uses mob mentality, but his non violent tactics ain’t gonna work in a criminal trial.
  8. Okay. Hamas is sponsored by Iran. Iran is Russia’s leading supplier of arms for the war in Ukraine. Putin has not denounced Hamas. The Freedom Caucus does not want to aid Ukraine, which is an implicit endorsement of Putin. So, which one is it? You can’t have it both ways. I think Hamas is perfidious. I also think the Palestinians have a right to self government just as I support Israel’s right. Hamas is not Palestine. They are filling a void in leadership.
  9. Who are you talking about. Hannity or Kennedy?
  10. Who?
  11. Maybe. But regardless of what the Young Turks think, the video speaks for itself.
  12. Hannity. The house painter turned talking head turned clown. RFK was a FOX darling until he wasn’t. Fair and balanced does not depend on the direction the wind blows. Hence…
  13. Yep. CIA introduced crack cocaine under Reagan’s watch, and that ensured the drug war would never end. Middle and upper class casualties are just collateral damage.
  14. Did you not read my post of 21 hrs. ago? The taxpayers of New York who play fairly are the victims. His competitors who play fairly are victims. A bank would sue him. The state Attorney General represents the people as a whole and can sue on their behalf. Take a civics class.
  15. Unless they’re going before the appraisal board.
  16. So, is the judge only fair when he rules fairly in a way the Orange Man likes? He can’t be deep state and impartial the same time.
  17. Again, you would not be an honest juror if you said political affiliation would not affect your consideration of the evidence. I trust that enough people take the court process seriously that a randomly selected jury pool would contain at least 12 people who could look at evidence, not personality or politics. Were I called for a Trump trial jury pool I would have to disqualify myself. And I would.
  18. Go for it, says I.
  19. [Hidden Content] Here’s one. As for firing her, he can’t hardly find a lawyer anymore who’ll work for him. He has a reputation for not listening to OR paying his lawyers.
  20. Do you know how much Trump argued it was worth for tax appraisal purposes? <$26 million. So, which one is it? 26 or 400? The aggrieved party is all the New Yorkers who paid their fair share of property taxes while the cheat dodged. Fraud. Sad. And yes, I believe enough in the system that I would not be afraid to be judged by a jury of my friends peers, regardless of political affiliation. You just showed your hand there, bud. Party affiliation would cloud your ability to judge fairly. That’s un-American.
  21. What does James Woods have to do with anything? You don’t trust Hollywood people UNLESS they hold your point of view? Western Civilization is not failing because of immigration. It’s not failing because of globalization. It’s not failing, period. Democracy is under attack from people like Putin, Orban, Un - people you think are cool, not to mention your feckless leader, who wants to be just like them.
  22. What happened with the impeachment investigation, then? All the witnesses last week admitted they had no hard evidence. Big poop show that was.
×
×
  • Create New...