UT alum

You mean talk about current events in a manner that supports your view of reality. The guy is a pox on civil discourse.

It’s useless if you can’t tell the difference between news and entertainment.

Rush doesn't give facts, he spins facts.

I never watch her. She's an entertainer, too.

My political beliefs are not based on “what he said”, i.e. ditto.

In Russia.

I listened to that clown for years. Quit him when he said he hoped Obama failed. I’ve never thought that about any president, even Trump. Yeah, journalistic integrity.

Rush Limbaugh is a freakin’ entertainer.

Came out of the box too quickly with Bin Laden claim. Media focus depends on the network.

Man, you sound like a 60’s hippie.

Including you, I hope.

That was then. Bin Laden was still alive, focus was on Middle East, Obama, to the best of my knowledge, did not have business dealings with any Russians, was not seeking any investments in Russian real estate.

Treasury is part of executive branch, Trump is chief executive. Yeah, it passed Congress, by a vote of 42 for 57 against. None of that is fake. Are we going to have to be singing the State Anthem of the Russian Federation at ballgames before you get it?

Clapper and Brennan had no input into these reports.

Wray is Trump’s appointee. So are Haspel and Coats.

I think Ken Starr perfected that strategy years ago.

CIA - Iran is in compliance with nuclear deal signed during Obama administration. FBI - Russia still using social media platforms as a vehicle for weaponizing disinformation and spreading foreign influence in the United States. NSA - ISIS still commands thousands of soldiers in Syria and Iraq NSA - currently assesses that North Korea will continue to retain its WMD capabilities and it is unlikely to completely give up its nuclear capabilities I listened to the head of each agency listed above make those statements. Two hours of testimony and no mention of rationale for a wall, and 0 questions about need for wall in 2 hours of testimony. Any thoughts?

Maybe violated is not the right word. Unethically took advantage of. Wall Street Journal and Forbes covered it

Violated contract law, not criminal law.

Still no refutation about the subs. Reputable business people pay the people who work for them, whether it be directly or indirectly.

Easy, Stevenash. I was kinda making a joke there on the casinos. Are liberals not permitted to joke, or do you just think it’s impossible that we could have a sense of humor? And, it didn’t go unnoticed that there was no comeback for the comment about all the subs he’s stiffed. Stand up guy, that Donald Trump.

The most brilliant business mind possibly ever (many people have said) wouldn’t go broke in a business rigged to win. Can’t say as I I’ve figured out your fixation on Solyndra. Me, Chuck, and Nancy don’t call them murderers and rapists. What kind of business man hires murderers and rapists? He won because of Hillary’s incompetence as a campaigner, not his brilliance.

Dang, I bet you might could get a place in his cabinet, or at least Huckabee Sanders’ job.

Or bankrupt casino owners who stiff subs and hires illegals. I mean, really, how brilliant is a guy who can’t make a legal gambling business go?

Biden