Jump to content

Judex

Members
  • Posts

    178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Judex

  1. [quote name="ForeverADog" post="822742" timestamp="1280865920"] I don't think this is disturbing as long as the students are doing what they want. If they are doing what makes them happy and also doing what will most likely get them a free college ride and will get them to the next level. The schools will he okay it is totally up to the players and if that is what they want then go for it. [/quote] i agree. they should be able to do what they want to do.
  2. will there be a live webcast? sure would be nice to watch from up here :)
  3. [quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="813998" timestamp="1277162907"] According to DCTF, these are how many returning letterman and starters each team has for this coming season:                        Letterman        Starters O/D Bridge City             16                    7/5 Hamshire-Fann        19                  10/9 Hardin-Jefferson      12                   6/4 Orangefield             13                   5/6 Silsbee                  15                    8/7 WOS                     20                    6/7 All this time, I thought the Mustangs had 19 returning starters. ;) ;D I guess that's what I get for taking the word of a certain LCM grad. ;) ::) [/quote] maybe you would enjoy these boards more if you would just spend more time fixating on WO-S . . .
  4. [quote name="ChampionEagles" post="808087" timestamp="1275408936"] I agree. I read both post. [b]The deletion police seem to be getting a little out of hand. And if they don't delete they will edit to change the entire meaning and bring it more in line with what they believe.[/b] [/quote] THIS is why i just quit posting here altogether a long long time ago . . .
  5. jesus, i am so sick of people crying about how bad someone beat them and unfair it is, regardless of the sport. get good or get beat - period.
  6. [quote name="skipper" post="697465" timestamp="1257389084"] i dont think thomas had a bad game agnest TT so lets see what happnes agnest the aggies [/quote] jesus man, why wont you even try? at the very least the misspelled words are underlined in red for crying out loud.
  7. [quote name="33" post="686752" timestamp="1256583855"] you sir are an idiot [/quote] please do NOT delete this - i am a HUGE fan of the use of literary devices, like irony.
  8. [quote name="swampdude" post="685241" timestamp="1256416322"] we have had a prayer before the game at least for the last two years. After Rita, Humberto, and Ike we would rather take our chances with the Supreme Court  than God !!!   ;) [/quote] Alhamdulillahi rabbil alameen!
  9. [quote name="33" post="683931" timestamp="1256321434"] [quote author=Majestyk link=topic=61188.msg683659#msg683659 date=1256302515] I wish folk would stop dogging WO-S out for a 62-0 win over HF saying it was nothing beating a down team.  There's nobody flipping for joy over here people.  It was a solid win for the Stangs, the game had to be played, it was on the schedule and the best team won 62-0, let it go.  Oldwildcat, I won't send no flak your way, but I do think you've been sniffing argon, or something with argon in it.  I agree the Cards can beat WO-S, I also believe Sabine Pass could beat Southlake Carroll, they'll just be needin some things go their way.  BC has improved and will continue to with their coaching but they may not be ready for what's coming tonight. [/quote] you're right... the better team did win that night, but so far HF hasn't been on that side of the scoreboard once this season.. so dont say it was a solid win because it wasnt! that game didn't define anything for WOS, get over it. tonight, i say BC wins by 2 possessions. the only person that needs to let that game go is you... no one said anything about it on this thread until you brought it up [/quote] ok, 33, was this a solid win? come choke it down.
  10. [quote name="33" post="683931" timestamp="1256321434"] [quote author=Majestyk link=topic=61188.msg683659#msg683659 date=1256302515] I wish folk would stop dogging WO-S out for a 62-0 win over HF saying it was nothing beating a down team.  There's nobody flipping for joy over here people.  It was a solid win for the Stangs, the game had to be played, it was on the schedule and the best team won 62-0, let it go.  Oldwildcat, I won't send no flak your way, but I do think you've been sniffing argon, or something with argon in it.  I agree the Cards can beat WO-S, I also believe Sabine Pass could beat Southlake Carroll, they'll just be needin some things go their way.  BC has improved and will continue to with their coaching but they may not be ready for what's coming tonight. [/quote] you're right... the better team did win that night, but so far HF hasn't been on that side of the scoreboard once this season.. so dont say it was a solid win because it wasnt! that game didn't define anything for WOS, get over it. tonight, i say BC wins by 2 possessions. the only person that needs to let that game go is you... no one said anything about it on this thread until you brought it up [/quote] i like you 33. you make comically moronic posts, you dont know how to argue, and you are a karma blackhole :D  how do you want that fat black bird cooked?
  11. Yes. And, don't just pray tonight. Everyday at noon, many have chosen to pray for this individual, his family and the Mustang family! And that is wrong. Not just because it was Silsbee...because he was a minor and the allegations. These kids' futures can potentially be turned upside down by allegations and persecutions by adults. I was one of the ones at bat for the Silsbee kids. Don't get me wrong, I am agreeing with you. I honestly didn't want anyone's name revealed, both in this case and the Silsbee case. I am just argueing the fact that these kids are minors. Bolton was a junior, 17 year old when the rape case came down, Franks is 17, all are what the law see's as not being a minor. They are considered adults now. you are wrong and need to just stop. 18 is the age of majority. in certain situations depending on the acts, the law sees fit to "charge" someone as an adult in the criminal arena. that does not make them an adult. he is still a minor for all other purposes if he is not yet 18.
  12. this is a fine example of the difference that technology makes. we all did some stupid stuff, but there usually wasnt a camera around to immortalize our less than spectacular moments. as the saying goes - a picture is worth a thousand words. i just hope that some people pull their heads out of their nether regions and not make this worse than it really is. there is a risk of ruining some peoples lives here in a real much ado about nothing.
  13. when you say "i think my team will beat so and so by 7 and hopefully make the playoffs" is confidence BUT "my team beat a 0 and whatever team and we are going to stomp everyone in district and go into the playoffs rollin" is being cocky no one here is gauging our team based off of beating HF. why do you keep making these stupid arguments? as for a prediction, i think WO-S takes down the team that got blanked by LC-M by at least 3 touchdowns. people were last night in the WOS / HF game update thread... no they weren't. they were observing that the Mustang players were playing with a different attitude - playing with a purpose and eliminating the mistakes and penalties. It had nothing to do with WHO we were playing. It was HOW we were playing. you just come on here and look for any reason at all to snipe at WO-S. to be expected i suppose. you will get your reality check this week, even if it doesn't help your obviously compromised intellectual capabilities.
  14. when you say "i think my team will beat so and so by 7 and hopefully make the playoffs" is confidence BUT "my team beat a 0 and whatever team and we are going to stomp everyone in district and go into the playoffs rollin" is being cocky no one here is gauging our team based off of beating HF. why do you keep making these stupid arguments? as for a prediction, i think WO-S takes down the team that got blanked by LC-M by at least 3 touchdowns.
  15. We'll know if the offensive problems are fixed over the next few weeks - one game won't tell the whole story. As for "going back to state"...that was dumb. Who is the "they" you referred to? I can think of one or two fantasy-minded people here who might say and think that, but you're way off the mark, dude. Most WO-S fans know that we're not there yet, and that we may not make a deep playoff run this year. So how can you make a leap from one positive remark about the offensive showing tonight to "now we think we're gonna win state." Get real... i THINK he was being sarcastic... go get a beer, sit back and relax, and just chill out for a minute... lol, you are one to talk, sittting there dispensing advice on your "omg we are hanging with Silsbee" high. i cant wait to serve you with the biggest fattest crow in the history of avian creatures in a few weeks
  16. duh. every single one of us knows that. i feel badly for HF. i hope they get things turned around.
  17. now see, if this type of label fits, i have no problem with it at all. but everyone here knows that if one of us non-mods, or at the very least if I had used this type of word to describe someone, either the post would have been deleted or, worse, someone would come in and edit it. the hypocrisy and censorship on this board are ridiculous. Dude you have only posted 28 times...Chill Out!!!!!! You may not last very long ;D lol, post count? really? are you ten? maybe i should drop some +1s for cred? Maybe you should drop your stupid comments. nou
  18. now see, if this type of label fits, i have no problem with it at all. but everyone here knows that if one of us non-mods, or at the very least if I had used this type of word to describe someone, either the post would have been deleted or, worse, someone would come in and edit it. the hypocrisy and censorship on this board are ridiculous. Dude you have only posted 28 times...Chill Out!!!!!! You may not last very long ;D lol, post count? really? are you ten? maybe i should drop some +1s for cred?
  19. now see, if this type of label fits, i have no problem with it at all. but everyone here knows that if one of us non-mods, or at the very least if I had used this type of word to describe someone, either the post would have been deleted or, worse, someone would come in and edit it. the hypocrisy and censorship on this board are ridiculous.
  20. sensitive? heck no, you misread us completely. we love watching ya'll bath in this superbowl win. you pay great homage in doing so - keep it up!! you should dedicate your bandwidth to daily replaying what is apparently the only meaningful win in the history of your program. i wish we could get so jacked about a routine district win
  21. wow, pot, kettle - explain what rule i broke for you to delete my post. the no sarcasm for the people who can't get over it rule? enjoy your superbowl celebration
  22. did anyone bother to tell you the score?
×
×
  • Create New...