Jump to content

RedBarn

Members
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RedBarn

  1. The program, like the Head Coach, is old, tired and complacent.  Given the talent in this area, there is no reason for Lamar to be as 'middle of the road' as they are (actually, they are worse than middle of the year -- they are in the ditch this year).

    Talent (or lack thereof) is on the coaching staff as well.  They recruit them and the coach them.  I'd clean house and start over with some energy and an attitude that we can win.  Baseball is a sport where a so-called mid major can compete. 

    Gilligan can coach a game, get in 18 and have a few pops with the old guard.  That is great for him but not the program. 

    My two cents.

  2. I missed Kyle.  Good kid, very deserving.  Two things in reply:

    [quote name="ntputter17" post="1021079" timestamp="1309266501"]
    [quote author=RedBarn link=topic=85097.msg1021058#msg1021058 date=1309231662]

    Redbarn---I mean no disservice to anyone, but there are at least 4 catchers listed. You're telling me that the most valuable player on the 1# team in the area doesnt belong? Garbage.......
    [/quote]

    Now its garbage?  That surely makes the kids who DID make the team feel good.

    And, it sure was a stroke of good luck that Babino played in the district he did.  After Markum, Henry and Menard, he would've only made Hon Men in that district.
  3. While I appreciate the impassioned defense of 1 kid who was not selected to the area wide Super Gold team, lets be honest.  He's a catcher.  Two catchers made it ahead of him and you disagree.  At least be honest about it and admit that what you're saying is that Babino's better than the 2 kids who made it -Caleb Henry and Matthew Menard.  But remember this: Henry was the defensive MVP of his district (and also hit .500 on the year) and Menard was the offensive MVP of his. 

    I think it does those 2 young men a disservice.  They are both very, very good ballplayers and deserved the recognition they received.  This is not meant as a slap at the other kid.  He may very well have been the 3rd best catcher in the area and region and that's not too shabby.
  4. This is a program that was 1 of the most competitve in 1 of the State's most competitive districts.  Now, it relies on a weak district and hopes to "back in" with the expanded playoff format.  Legitimate programs build players year in and year out. 

    Question:  has that happened with Da Brook?
    When you get to the obvious and unfortunate answer, then the question is: Why?
  5. I actually agree with y'all on that issue. The problem was that the JV had better receiverslast year than Dishon,who dropped several passes last year. Also, they had better DB's, although he was good for a "redshirt frshman", they had guys who were seniors who could have done better.  AS far as Menard is concerned, I agree the kid is a beast and did great as a true freshman last year.  He has a cannon fora arm but is very inaccurate and should never play ahead of Lemoine at QB.  What sense does it make, if he is the best RB, to take him out of that position, if Lemoine gets hurt, and move him to QB.  Now u have 2 backups playing.  Your QB is very inaccurate now and teams willfigure that out and key on him running the ball.  Then you won't be able to throw or run.  Believe me, there are a couple of kids who can play back up QB and hand off the ball to Menard and still run the other plays on offense. Seniors should play ahead of freshmen unless the freshmen areleaps and bounds better, which they weren't in this case.

    Man, you got a serious bee in your bonnet about the Dishon kid...plus youre plain wrong.  I hope the Cards turn it around but this idea of 'we got to play older kids just because theyre older' is how a program goes downhill.  It builds no future. 

  6. It is not uncommon for players in small 3A school to never play on a JV team.

    Positions and playing time is earned, not tenured. 

    Best of luck to the Cardinals.

    True words.  Smaller schools need to play their good athletes regardless of age or grade.  There is simply not enough talent to go around in a smaller, limited pool. 

    At BC, the only 2 freshman that had much playing time last year were Menard and Dishon.  Menard replaced Joe Robertson at RB when he was injured and performed superbly.  Dishon played WR and contributed as well.  This year, Menard is the starting RB and backup QB (he may be the starting QB before all is said and done -- with BC's OL, Lemoine is going to get killed back there).  Dishon has made a number of catches already this season and played great at DB. 

    Sure, you could play an older kid but what do you get?  Older but less talent.  There is a reason a kid at a small school plays JV ball as a junior....not meaning to step on anyone's toes...but facts are facts.

  7. Sounds like some people who are on outside looking in might be a little jealous???? 

    Seems to me that this is good info for baseball people.  The guy is a top notch coach (one of best in country), who decided to throw in with a local organziation that has nationalpresence.  Why isnt that worth being "pinned"?  Good grief...don't you guys have something better to do?

  8. The cold truth continues to slap the 'powers that be' in BC in the face:  Its easy to say 'no' to the BC coaching job.  For those who have been out of the country for the past few weeks, a quick review:

    1.  Coach Bryant is "re-assigned".  The pros and cons of that decision have been debated on this board and won't be repeated.  It is done.

    2.  Expecting that any and all would simple 'die' for this opportunity, the "powers that be" sat back and waited.  Coach Delome (an early favorite) did not apply (and in fact endorsed Coach Landry from HF).  Coach Brevell pulled out early. 

    3.  This left 3:  Jagneaux (who has applied for every opening in SE Texas, accepted 1 or 2, and then backed out), Fackler (who had the problem that he wasn't certified) and Landry. 

    4.  Jagneaux and Landry make the final cut and Fackler pulls his application.  Jagneaux then (what ????) pulls out, leaving Landry.  But wait...BC calls Green and offers him the job.  Today, Green turns the job down.  So, what does BC do?  Call Fackler to see if he is interested, leaving Landry once again twisting...

    SO WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

    1.  BC's reputation for politics and parental/board "over involvment" precedes them.

    2.  Green turning them down (read other threads and the "shock" at some BC supporters) shows us:  a top 4A job in a top 4A district beats a 3A job.  Remember:  BC isn't even the biggest 'dog' in their own district:  Jasper owns that now, kinda like they've owned BC the past 2 years in the playoffs.  Translations?  The Vidor job is a better job than the BC job...for many reasons.  How far has Vidor come, and how far has BC fallen, for that to happen?

    3.  The handling of this mess should be humilating to baseball people all across southeast Texas (from the way Bryant was treated thru the presnt).

    4.  Chad Landry should have had the job from day one.  Now what?  They're going to try to lure a guy back who pulled his application and has a foundation of sand?  If I was Landry, I'm not sure I'd take it now...

    The ones I really feel sorry for are the young men who are the BC baseball program.  Decisions are being made by, and for, the few...

×
×
  • Create New...