Here is my understanding as to what the situation is:
1. The ruling by the DEC was based upon an internal investigation by the BISD into allegations made to district AD's earlier in the week about an ineligible player.
2. The controversy centered around a Jaguar who began the season with insufficient credits to be eligible.
3. By UIL rule, if a player begins the season with ineligible credits, he is ineligible for the first six weeks of the school year. If the student is passing after the first six weeks, he regains his eligibility.
4. By the timeline, which was established after conferring with the UIL in Austin, the student in question would not have been eligible to play for Central until the Oct. 13th game against Nederland.
5. The student, backup/special teams player, played in 3 district games while ineligible, 9/20 vs. Memorial, 9/26 vs. Vidor, and 10/7 vs. Ozen. 2 of those games, Central lost so no forfeit was required there. But as Central defeated Ozen 49-14, they had to forfeit that game.
6. The DEC unaniously determined that there was no intent by Central to play an ineligible player. However, playing an ineligible player is a ZERO tolerance violation so the forfeiture was mandated.