eagleswoodville#1

Personally, id be willing to bet that EC will win state before Kville winds this district. lol ::)

Newton, 21-13. BC will compete well and keep it close. I think a late score seperates this one. But, as for Newton not having a passing game at all...your opinion is based off what? lol you obviously know nothing about what youre talking about, based on your previous posts. Why would anyone take you serious this time? Lol

[quote name="king" post="1244679" timestamp="1344899375"] [Hidden Content] [/quote] Negative. I would definitely say Chris Burke's 18th inning walk off in the 2005 NLDS after Berkman's game-tying grand slam beats this out lol

[quote name="Rake1" post="1250931" timestamp="1345896670"] [quote author=eagleswoodville#1 link=topic=101944.msg1250258#msg1250258 date=1345835320] Both teams looked good at times, and bad at times. Offensively, [color=red][b]Woodville just shoved it down BC's throat and out-coached them.[/b][/color] The talent is there. Great depth in the backfield, a line that improves every week, and one of the best 2-QB systems in the area. On the other hand, for the second week in a row, mental errors killed the Eagles, but we're much more limited this week. Woodville pulled out the win and is beginning to show a lot of promise. Defensively, the Eagles were aggressive and seemed to tackle a lot better this week. Secondary played exceptionally well. Linebackers should be improved when Harrison makes his return sometime soon. Defensive line was much more aggressive. They were undersized in this match-up and still seemed to use their quickness too their advantage. Improved as well is week. Bridge City kinda disappointed me this week. I expected a lot more. But they also showed a lot of promise. Offensively, they weren't near aggressive enough on the line. This isn't the NFL. Position blocking only gets you so far. Especially against a quicker, well-coached defensive line like Woodville's. The QB for Bridge City seems to be a decent replacement for Menard and is a heck of an athlete. The backfield was deep and the running back position and the receivers had pretty good hands and ran good routes. Speed was the difference offensively for the Cardinals. [color=red][b]Woodville was faster in their secondary and it proved to be the deciding factor.[/b][/color] Defensively, the Cards were very aggressive, overly aggressive at times. Woodville beat them on a well-called dump-off to the tightend that went for about 40 yards. Discipline was lacking. The technique and size on the defensive line was obviously there. Their line was the strength of their defense. [color=red][b]Speed in the secondary, or lack there of,[/b][/color] and discipline on the defensive side of the ball, proved crucial to this match-up. Overall, it was a pretty evenly-matched tune-up. Both teams had momentum and highlights at times. [color=red][b]Woodville was just more successful in the red-zone[/b][/color], whereas Bridge City just seemed to not be able to finish drives at all. But a good measuring stick for both teams. [/quote] Wow??? Must have been a looked a lot different from that side of the field..... To say that Woodville shoved it down BC's throat is quite a stretch, and that's being nice. "More successful in the red zone?" How do you figure that one? A scramble by the QB against the 2nd team defense in the controlled portion of the scrimmage was the only score all night, and it was a very nice play by that young man for sure. One long pass for the other "semi highlight" and that's about it. BC ran the ball very well, make no mistake about that. A fumble from the Wildcat formation inside the Woodville 5yd line cost BC a Touchdown and they also dropped another pass to a wide open receiver in the endzone. Woodville was the beneficiary of BC miscues for sure. As far as speed goes correct me if I'm wrong but didn't BC have a LB run down an Eagle tailback from behind when he should have scored? Sure looked like it. Now I will certainly give credit where it's due and say Woodville played a great game/scrimmage. They appeared to be well conditioned, disciplined and coached. I personally liked the enthusiasm that the Woodville coaches showed, good stuff for sure. Woodville has some good athletes and they ran both their Offense and Defense very smooth. The Eagles will certainly be in a position to contend every Friday night. BC on the other hand did not play as well as they did against Lumberton, anybody who says they did is not being honest. The Cardinals certainly have some things to work on before they head for Newton on Friday. Offensively they are on the right pace with a balanced attack between running and passing. Execution is the most critical part for them, cut down penalties and hold on to the ball. Defensively they must tackle better! Way too much grabbing and trying to strip the ball, not enough "putting the hat" on people. The next 2 weeks will be tough for BC as they take on 2 good teams in Newton and Vidor. Hopefully this scrimmage was a wake up call. Rake1 [/quote] Maybe it was a bit of an over-statement. By success in the redzone, im referring to the amount of penalties, turnovers, etc, in the redzone. By that definition, Woodville won that battle.

Will try to update this one!

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="1250330" timestamp="1345839318"] [quote author=eagleswoodville#1 link=topic=101948.msg1250318#msg1250318 date=1345838658] [quote author=Kvillecats link=topic=101948.msg1250288#msg1250288 date=1345836526] [quote author=ECFAN#1 link=topic=101948.msg1250220#msg1250220 date=1345833372] [quote author=Kvillecats link=topic=101948.msg1250123#msg1250123 date=1345827757] [quote author=ECFAN#1 link=topic=101948.msg1249930#msg1249930 date=1345813671] [quote author=First Down link=topic=101948.msg1249911#msg1249911 date=1345810553] [quote author=Kvillecats link=topic=101948.msg1249677#msg1249677 date=1345774314] I bet they dont beat Kirbyville! [/quote] Kirbyville will be lucky to get 3rd in the district [/quote]  EC gonna come to Kville thinking that 2-9 record in 3A last year gonna guarantee them a win. You gonna get beat my friend...we don't lose to no Bucs ;) If you are smart you would not bet [u][b]very much[/b][/u]  !!!! Hush while you can dud, you are making yourself and town look bad. [/quote] [/quote] Talk is cheap and saying it over and over again doesn't make it true. Click your feet together three times and maybe you'll be back in the real world. That's the ugly truth.  ;D ;D ;D [/quote] Ok..you gon learn! We are still Kirbyville and you gon see in Wildcat land soon ;) [/quote] You act like Kville has been dominant for decades, like Newton or Daingerfield. Noooo, we can go back to the 80's 90's and early 2000's and see just how "successful" they were then lol [/quote] Not worried about no Newton or Dangerfield! Let's see where The Lady Birds stand come district time! ::) [/quote] These Birds won 5 games last year. Not two. And haven't won less than four in a long time. There's a difference between trash talk and idiocracy, and you have officially crossed it.

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="1250321" timestamp="1345838826"] [quote author=eagleswoodville#1 link=topic=102026.msg1250314#msg1250314 date=1345838447] [quote author=Kvillecats link=topic=102026.msg1250291#msg1250291 date=1345836739] [quote author=justsaying link=topic=102026.msg1250285#msg1250285 date=1345836422] How is Kirbyville with the pass defense...  Silsbee didn't get in trouble with EC's run game.. It was the passing game that was getting the first downs... [/quote] That's the only way you guys will have success...I can promise Roberts will get slowed down by this Wildcats defense this year. [/quote] Then they'll just pass for 300 yds and 5 TD's :) [/quote] Heck naw, our defense is well ahead against the run than pass...that's what I'm saying. Dnt know what kind of pressure Silsbee was bringing, but hope EC quarterback don't think he'll be having a field day on our secondary. [/quote] Kville is not deep enough to stop both. Smh. So naive.

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="1250288" timestamp="1345836526"] [quote author=ECFAN#1 link=topic=101948.msg1250220#msg1250220 date=1345833372] [quote author=Kvillecats link=topic=101948.msg1250123#msg1250123 date=1345827757] [quote author=ECFAN#1 link=topic=101948.msg1249930#msg1249930 date=1345813671] [quote author=First Down link=topic=101948.msg1249911#msg1249911 date=1345810553] [quote author=Kvillecats link=topic=101948.msg1249677#msg1249677 date=1345774314] I bet they dont beat Kirbyville! [/quote] Kirbyville will be lucky to get 3rd in the district [/quote]  EC gonna come to Kville thinking that 2-9 record in 3A last year gonna guarantee them a win. You gonna get beat my friend...we don't lose to no Bucs ;) If you are smart you would not bet [u][b]very much[/b][/u]  !!!! Hush while you can dud, you are making yourself and town look bad. [/quote] [/quote] Talk is cheap and saying it over and over again doesn't make it true. Click your feet together three times and maybe you'll be back in the real world. That's the ugly truth.  ;D ;D ;D [/quote] Ok..you gon learn! We are still Kirbyville and you gon see in Wildcat land soon ;) [/quote] You act like Kville has been dominant for decades, like Newton or Daingerfield. Noooo, we can go back to the 80's 90's and early 2000's and see just how "successful" they were then lol

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="1250291" timestamp="1345836739"] [quote author=justsaying link=topic=102026.msg1250285#msg1250285 date=1345836422] How is Kirbyville with the pass defense...  Silsbee didn't get in trouble with EC's run game.. It was the passing game that was getting the first downs... [/quote] That's the only way you guys will have success...I can promise Roberts will get slowed down by this Wildcats defense this year. [/quote] Then they'll just pass for 300 yds and 5 TD's :)

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="1250300" timestamp="1345837153"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=102026.msg1250284#msg1250284 date=1345836337] [quote author=Kvillecats link=topic=102026.msg1250275#msg1250275 date=1345835948] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=102026.msg1250247#msg1250247 date=1345834851] From what I have seen with my own eyes in the scrimmages played thus far, the favorite to win the district title is East Chambers, hands down!! [/quote] Yeah right! They spanked y'all in the scrimmage and now u assuming they gonna beat us....LMAO [/quote] I saw with my own eyes Kirbyville scrimmage Deweyville and Hamshire-Fannett. Kirbyville did not look as good against those teams as East Chambers did against Silsbee. I think most intelligent folks will tell you Silsbee is a far better team than HF and Deweyville. East Chambers will beat Kirbyville. Want to bet another $100 just on that game? [/quote] For the records, Silsbee an average team like the rest. If I'm not mistaken, this the same HF team that had the silsbee fans butt holes puckered up until late in the 3rd or 4th quarter last year. Don't sit here and make judgements based off the whooping y'all took yesterday. Again Wildcats win district "hands down"..peace! [/quote] I see you didn't accept his bet ::) figures.

Agreed. EC is definitely the favorite as of now.

Both teams looked good at times, and bad at times. Offensively, Woodville just shoved it down BC's throat and out-coached them. The talent is there. Great depth in the backfield, a line that improves every week, and one of the best 2-QB systems in the area. On the other hand, for the second week in a row, mental errors killed the Eagles, but we're much more limited this week. Woodville pulled out the win and is beginning to show a lot of promise. Defensively, the Eagles were aggressive and seemed to tackle a lot better this week. Secondary played exceptionally well. Linebackers should be improved when Harrison makes his return sometime soon. Defensive line was much more aggressive. They were undersized in this match-up and still seemed to use their quickness too their advantage. Improved as well is week. Bridge City kinda disappointed me this week. I expected a lot more. But they also showed a lot of promise. Offensively, they weren't near aggressive enough on the line. This isn't the NFL. Position blocking only gets you so far. Especially against a quicker, well-coached defensive line like Woodville's. The QB for Bridge City seems to be a decent replacement for Menard and is a heck of an athlete. The backfield was deep and the running back position and the receivers had pretty good hands and ran good routes. Speed was the difference offensively for the Cardinals. Woodville was faster in their secondary and it proved to be the deciding factor. Defensively, the Cards were very aggressive, overly aggressive at times. Woodville beat them on a well-called dump-off to the tightend that went for about 40 yards. Discipline was lacking. The technique and size on the defensive line was obviously there. Their line was the strength of their defense. Speed in the secondary, or lack there of, and discipline on the defensive side of the ball, proved crucial to this match-up. Overall, it was a pretty evenly-matched tune-up. Both teams had momentum and highlights at times. Woodville was just more successful in the red-zone, whereas Bridge City just seemed to not be able to finish drives at all. But a good measuring stick for both teams.

1. Newton 2. EC 3. Corrigan-Camden 4. New Waverly 5. Anahuac 6. Shepherd 7. Hardin 8. Warren 9. Kountze 10. Kirbyville ::)

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="1249677" timestamp="1345774314"] I bet they dont beat Kirbyville! [/quote] Naivety in its top form right there. 

Should be a good tune-up, higher competition, and a good measuring stick for the Eagles. Looking forward to watching this one!

[quote name="Walk off" post="1239861" timestamp="1343247700"] Gives Warren the best pitching staff in the area...period...With Gray, Watts, and Williams...just nasty. Gray - solid, brings the heat. Watts - nastiest curve ball around. (Yes, [b]nastiest[/b]. Anytime a rt. handed curve ball can make a lefthanded ALL-STATE batter buckle his knees...Nasty) Williams - Lefty and down right good....  Any one pitcher might be better, but for a series, this team is loaded. [/quote] Negative. Good? Yes. Best in district, yes. Best in the area? Negative ghost-rider. Gray is upper 70's at best. Watts might touch 80 a couple times. Williams is the best pitcher on this staff now, and by no means dominating. It'll take a lot more than just him to make them that good. How bout Silsbee, Nederland, Barbers Hill, PNG, Brenham, Livingston, Huntington, Hudson, Bridge City, Woodville, Etc.?

[b]Baytown Sterling[/b]/Baytown Lee Beaumont Central/[b]Port Arthur Memorial[/b] Beaumont Ozen/[b]Beaumont West Brook[/b] Crosby/[b]Nederland[/b] Little Cypress-Mauriceville/[b]West Orange-Stark[/b] Port Neches-Groves/[b]Silsbee[/b] [b]Vidor[/b]/Santa Fe [b]Fort Bend Elkins[/b]/Dayton Nuevo Leon/[b]Barbers Hill[/b] [b]Livingston[/b]/Woodlands College Park [b]Hardin-Jefferson[/b]/Anahuac Orangefield/[b]East Chambers[/b] Bridge City/[b]Newton[/b] Hamshire-Fannett/[b]Splendora[/b] [b]Jasper[/b]/Liberty [b]Shepherd[/b]/Kountze [b]Hull-Daisetta[/b]/Hardin [b]Warren[/b]/Evadale Sabine Pass/[b]Deweyville[/b] [b]Beaumont Kelly[/b]/West Sabine Burkeville/[b]West Hardin[/b] Buna/[b]Center[/b] New Waverly/[b]Woodville[/b] [b]San Augustine[/b]/Tyler Grace

[quote name="songone" post="1247615" timestamp="1345463985"] 24-4A 1. Pearland Dawson 2. Friendswood 3. Goose Creek Memorial 4. Texas City Does someone seriously think Friendswood and GCM will beat out this years Texas City squad? IMO! 1. Pearland Dawson 2. Texas City 3.  GCM 4.  Friendswood 3 & 4 or interchangeable IMO... [/quote] To answer your question, yes, obviously. But thanks for your opinion.

[quote name="ECBucFan" post="1247618" timestamp="1345465778"] 21-5A 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 19-4A 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 20-4A 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 24-4A 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 20-AAA 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 21-AAA 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 22-AAA 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 10-AA-I 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 12-AA-II 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 10-A-I 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 11-A-I 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 11-A-II 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville 6MAN 16-I 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville A-1. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville TAPPS 3-I 1. Kirbyville A. Kirbyville 1st. Kirbyville [/quote] Hahahahah :) ::)

[quote name="dustoff03" post="1247535" timestamp="1345430911"] [quote author=eagleswoodville#1 link=topic=101808.msg1247529#msg1247529 date=1345430496] [quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=101808.msg1247523#msg1247523 date=1345429636] seriously. why not wait for a few games before we predict playoffs. hence last year should have taught us this. [/quote] Just a prediction. Obviously these will not stay the same as the season advances. Consider them my pre-season picks :) [/quote] ok, i'll give you your opinion. and if you had seen Vidor's scrimmage, you would not have them 4th. imo. [/quote] Maybe you're right. That was an iffy, last-minute addition. Could very well be LCM or Ozen instead.

[quote name="dustoff03" post="1247523" timestamp="1345429636"] seriously. why not wait for a few games before we predict playoffs. hence last year should have taught us this. [/quote] Just a prediction. Obviously these will not stay the same as the season advances. Consider them my pre-season picks :)

Thanks!

[u]21-5A[/u] 1. La Porte 2. PA Memorial 3. Galena Park North Shore 4. Channelview [u]19-4A[/u] 1. Dayton 2. Humble Summer Creek 3. Barbers Hill 4. Kingwood Park [u]20-4A[/u] 1. Nederland 2. Port Neches Groves 3. Livingston 4. Vidor [u]24-4A[/u] 1. Pearland Dawson 2. Friendswood 3. Goose Creek Memorial 4. Texas City [u]20-AAA[/u] 1. Carthage 2. Jasper 3. Center [u]21-AAA[/u] 1. Silsbee 2. West Orange Stark 3. Bridge City [u]22-AAA[/u] 1. Coldspring 2. Huffman-Hargrave 3. Cleveland [u]10-AA-I[/u] 1. East Chambers 2. Newton 3. Woodville [u]12-AA-II[/u] 1. Corrigan-Camden 2. Hemphill 3. Deweyville [u]10-A-I[/u] 1. San Augustine 2. West Sabine 3. Alto [u]11-A-I[/u] 1. West Hardin 2. Colmesneil [u]11-A-II[/u] 1. Teneha 2. Evadale 3. Mount Enterprise [u]6MAN 16-I[/u] 1. High Island 2. Oakwood [u]TAPPS 3-I[/u] 1. Houston St.Pius X 2. Beaumont Kelly 3. Houston St.Thomas

Good luck Kville! I'd love to see y'all do well in this district. Well besides beating Woodville ;) lol but definitely should be a fun race to watch progress!

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="1247459" timestamp="1345416279"] [quote author=eagleswoodville#1 link=topic=101715.msg1247451#msg1247451 date=1345415345] You have names? I do too. Harrison, Lockhart, Daniels, Johnson(also receiving D1 looks). On this note, you didn't even name the only college hopeful y'all do have, Jacob Keene. [/quote] So you actually believe Woodville gonna get by Kirbyville this year. Wishful thinking....smh [/quote] Because you obviously don't get out and watch much high school football in this area outside Kirbyville.