Jump to content

Mart vs San Augustine friday @ 7:30 pm. palestine hs


jlc2010

who wins?  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. who wins?

    • SA
      12
    • Mart
      19


Recommended Posts

I said before the season this was the matchup that imo determines who wins rgion 3 in class A div 1. both teams very very fast, big and will hit It will come down to execution. And which defense plays the best. A great team will go home after friday night. I see a very close game.



my pick

SA 27
Mart 23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing both teams I have concluded (and remember these are my opinions based off what I saw from both teams and comparing my views)

Team Speed: Edge SA
Mart has extremely fast skill position players
San Augustine's entire team is extremely fast

Offense: Edge Mart
Mart is VERY disciplined on offense, close to flawless execution and no stupid penalties and very limited turnovers.
San Augustine is really good offensively but they just don't execute as well as Mart and historically speaking SA does not handle adversity as well.  Sorry SA guys it's just the way I see it!

Defense: Edge SA
Mart's defense is good but they don't seem to shut down speedy offenses as well.
SA may have the fastest/quickest to the ball defense I've seen.  I don't know how they do it but they get through the line at lightning speed.  Mart will NOT be able to get to the corners and turn it up field for large gains very easily against this defense, plus SA hits HARD and then hits again and then when you think it's over they hit you again.

Special teams:  Wash
Both teams showed little in the games I watched

Niether team will have faced an opponent this year with as much speed as what they will see in this game.

The old saying "defense wins championships" leads me to believe that SA will come out on top in this contest....

SA 40
Mart 35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1342943" timestamp="1353967877"]
[quote author=One4All link=topic=106781.msg1342940#msg1342940 date=1353967507]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=106781.msg1342871#msg1342871 date=1353960837]
52-21 Mart
[/quote]
I see you ,...30points ............lol ,want,happen
[/quote]ok  :P
[/quote]


Yep, you were right,  thanks to that gimme touchdown at the end if the game. It was only a 28 point margin.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...