Jump to content

SILSBEE VS. HUFFMAN BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 54-21!!!


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Air Bisquit
[quote name="BADSANTA" post="1334088" timestamp="1353126881"]
Silsbee wins 54-21 Game Over! Great call Mike and Tim as always
[/quote]

Never was close!!!

Congrats to Huffman on a good season!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huffman was in the game early. I told my son that it didnt feel like it was 21-0. I even thought up until the punt return for a touchdown that Huffman was still in the game. Huffman had its chances and never punched the dang thing in! O well. Good luck Silsbee. See you next year in round 1!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="falconfanatic" post="1333729" timestamp="1353121942"]
[quote author=Farmer Fran link=topic=106375.msg1333696#msg1333696 date=1353121659]
[quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=106375.msg1333608#msg1333608 date=1353120562]
[quote author=BADSANTA link=topic=106375.msg1333582#msg1333582 date=1353120178]
[quote author=LOKI link=topic=106375.msg1333534#msg1333534 date=1353119529]
Huffman is not that good at all

[/quote]

Huffmanis very good!
[/quote]

They definitely don't look like it tonight! >:(
[/quote]

Maybe that is because of the Tigers defense. Townley is running for his life  ;D ;D
[/quote]

They have played better defenses and weren't this bad. They drove the ball inside the Tigers 10 twice and didn't score that is on the O. Not talking anything away from Silsbee, but it's obvious Huffman has had an off night so far.
[/quote]

The problem for Huffman was the same one my Tigers faced last week,  speed on the defensive side.  Huffman had one player with enough speed to get open consistently, Gray.  The speed the Tigers have in the secondary pretty much limited Huffman's success through the air.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a few quick stats:

              1    2    3  4    T
Silsbee    13  14  14  13  54
Huffman  0    0  14  7  21

Silsbee                            Huffman
Passing
P. Reed    10-22-188-0-1  P. Townley 16-38-267-4-2
K. Scott    2-2-1
Rushing   
P. Reed      19-149 2TD    P. Townley  7-(56)
Y. Brydson    9-42    TD    M. Longoria 4-26
F. Spearman 8-21  3TD    D. Gray      4-13 TD
K. Scott        7-28              R. Marches  2-20
Z. Jackson    2-(5)
  45-235 5.22 ypc                17-3 0.18 ypc 
Recieving
J. Holmes    3-69              D. Gray      8-131 TD
Z. Jackson    3-3              C. Harrell    7-128 TD
C. Elam        2-83 TD        M. Longeria 1-8
F. Spearman 1-15
K. Scott        1-14
K. Ellers        1-8
L. Barnes      1-(3)

          25            First Downs        17
          13            Rushing              1
          7              Passing              12
          5              Penalty              4
          8-13        3rd Down        1-10
          0-1          4th Down        1-2
      3-41 Avg.      Punts            5-37 Avg.
                          PAT
          4-7          1 Point            3-3
          1-1          2 Point            0-0
            1            Turnovers        5
            0              Fumbles          0
            0              INT                4
            1              TOD                1
          12-82        Penalties        7-90
          32:06          TOP            15:54

M. Garcia  3            INT
K. Elers

J. Holmes 50 punt return for a TD   
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BADSANTA" post="1334618" timestamp="1353162057"]
I think Stafford will be a good test for the Tigers. They have some good athletes as well. They beat Yates 40-20. Their regular season record was 5-5. Good Luck Tigers!
[/quote]

No way bc you guys will blow them out. When is the game?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BADSANTA" post="1334618" timestamp="1353162057"]
I think Stafford will be a good test for the Tigers. They have some good athletes as well. They beat Yates 40-20. Their regular season record was 5-5. Good Luck Tigers!
[/quote]

This game shouldn't be close. Yates has been terrible this year they lost to Kashmere and got blownout by North Forrest, and Stafford lost to Splendora.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BADSANTA" post="1335338" timestamp="1353193054"]
I sure hope so! He is maybe the best back they have seen all year.
[/quote]I would have to argue on that. LCMs running back And Livingstons both were better. I even saw where BC was saying there big #34 was the districts best running back. He may have got 30 yrds all night. Silsbee can stop the running game
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,985
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SVD Beaumont
    Newest Member
    SVD Beaumont
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Where were the 8 Omaha teams in D1's preseason top 25 poll... 2. Florida 8. A&M 9. Tennessee 13. N.C.State 14. Virginia 15. North Carolina Kentucky - unranked Florida State - unranked
    • That TDS is really flaring. Now do Biden. You have way, way, way more material. And keep that bitter "you are better than me" jealousy tone you have with Trump. You know Biden, the one you want everyone to vote for instead of Trump. Somehow you didn't acknowledge my pleas for you to die a painful death. I was quite certain that is how you would have interpreted my previous post. I guess when your focus is Trump 24/7, nothing else matters.
    • I have a better one. The point that nobody wants to acknowledge is that Dems are crossing over to vote Trump in the primaries and in the general so he will win the presidency. That way Trump will get the blame when the Dems implement their sinister plan to deport all of the minorities in the country. They have already laid the groundwork...convincing everyone that Trump and Republicans are racist (without providing any proof). Then it will be just a matter of time to execute their White supremacy plan of the great purge of the dirty, unwashed, heathen, non-Whites that roam freely in this country. I think my theory is more viable than your theory. Maybe we can get some other ridiculous scenarios so we can start a poll.
    • But that’s what Trump’s fanboys don’t understand.  When he talked about sexually assaulting women, y’all laughed it off as “locker room talk.”  When it was proven that he raped E. Jean Carroll, you cried that it was all an injustice… a lie. Even though he’d already confessed to doing the same thing to other women.  John McCain has suffered and sacrificed more for his country than practically anybody, except possible gold star families… and Trump called him a loser or something to that effect. “Oh, it was a joke that no one was supposed to take seriously.” But when Trump, after disrespecting the sacrifices of one of our most valiant, y’all are like “just because Trump didn’t go to Omaha Beach doesn’t mean he isn’t pro military!” Really? All you have to do is listen to what he said about McCain’s service. Not McCain as an opponent, not McCain’s political views… about the fact that the man was tortured, probably raped, and who knows what all else for over five years for swearing an oath and putting on the uniform.  But all of y’all supposedly “pro military” people just laughed along with Trump. “Good one, Sir! Maverick my new-hind! Filthy Rino!”  I don’t understand how the same people (y’all) who probably always say “thank you for your service” to any veteran still support a guy who craps on the ones who suffered the most on our behalf.  It’s baffling. 
    • Wow. Do you actually believe your little scenario has any chance of alleviating you of your moral immaturity? Deflection at it's best...or worse. You seem to be a sad case. If you died today, I would be remiss if not attributing your cause of death to severe TDS, and of course, Covid. Look at that. I just made a joke about your death. You did not get offended. Nobody was offended. Not one person will accuse me of being hateful towards fellow human beings. But yet, you hate Trump because he made a similar crude comment about McCain. You tried to attribute that comment as evidence Trump hates the military. What grade level of schoolchildren do you think is laughing at you for that "less that adolescent" (hint, hint) comment. You used one crude comment in an attempt to justify your TDS. Now, when called on it, you try to deflect the whole topic. You are certainly not having any fun with this, but you sure are providing entertainment for the board. It's a shame you can't join in on the fun. I think even Big Girl might be to the point of giggling at the shamelessness you are exhibiting.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...