Jump to content

best players in the area


Recommended Posts

Word is that the Dishon kid is fast' date=' great arm, and excellent athete. Many say he is legite D 1 and probably high draft pick...[/quote']

The description of Dishon is accurate. He is probably the fastest baseball player in the area, an wonderful athlete and a high-caliber arm from CF. He is still refining his pitching. His weakness is his offensive game which (right now) relies very much on his speed (and won't play nearly as well at higher levels) and the occassional power surge he shows (i.e. 2 HR @ Kelly Tournament). He is a legitimate D1 (and D1 at a major baseball school) and may get looks for the draft. Whether he is a 'high draft pick' is a stretch but he's still got over a year to develop baseball-wise. Very good athlete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect, i would have to disagree with assumption that dishon is a legitimate D1(and D1 at a major baseball school) at this point in his career

The term DI is used so often that it becomes tarnished....There is a big difference in a guy who gets books from McNeese and a guy who get books from a Big XII or SEC school...

I believe DI guys have 'It' and they have it from the time that they are young

IMO there are better centerfielders in our area

thanks,

muchacho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree that this area is full of talent, but Josh Gardiner, and Dede Lott

have to be in mix with some of these names in this area.

Josh is pithing real good and batting avg.347 real impressive ha

Dede lott although not pitching alot is batting avg. 650 with 2hrs

one hommer oppo 380 the other dead center over the lights.

not saying that they should be with the fisrt team but with some of the names i hear they are right there. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BobcatBeliever

I'm with you on Dishon and Coleman. They definitely deserve to be listed in that top 10. But, as this season progresses, watch that kid, Rober Shellhammer, the catcher from Jasper....He's one tough kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BobcatBeliever

Muchachoenelcielo

You obviously don't know ANYTHING at all about the Dishon kid.....talent or character wise. The one thing you said correctly though, is that D1 talent is displayed at a very young age, and I've been watching the Dishon kid play baseball since he was 7 years old. He most definitely has that talent. Give him some credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that there is a difference amongst D1 programs. Texas is a different level than Sam Houston, for example (other than they both wear orange). Still, a player at any D1 school is still a pretty fair country ballplayer.

As far as Dishon, he is a definite D1 player (although more as an athlete than anything). I love his speed (it is a 'plus' tool) and his arm is upwards to 90 from the OF. Personally, his offense is the part of his game which gives him the most difficulty as far as the next level. His athleticism probably overcomes this. By the way, he as already got 'the' letter which states the D1 program is prepared to offer him a 'full ride' to play baseball. For those of you who understand the realities of the 11.7 scholarship rule, that is remarkable. That school is currently ranked #1 in the nation. And has a long history of success at a national level. I think he fits the description of a 'legitimate D1 prospect'.

At times, he may be overrated simply because his 'plus' talents overcome his 'above average' talents. That is particularly true when he plays at a 3A school. Still, a great, great talent....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...