Jump to content

Lumberton vs. Silsbee Predictions?


KFDM COOP

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name="Jackthehammer" post="838926" timestamp="1283625716"]
Im gonna say great game. Was last year. How is Silsbee run defense this season??????
[/quote]


Very good. Thru two games, they have given up a total of 79 yards rushing. Avg. of 39.5 yards a game.

Silsbee thru the first two games is only giving up an avg. of 104.5 yards of offense a game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the key injuries that the Raiders have....this will be their biggest test so far. Coach Creduer will have to have a sharp game plan together if he wants to squeeze past the tigers. BH exposed a few weaknesses in the Raiders defense that silsbee may want to try a time or two. This should be a hard fought game that comes down to the wire.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BIG HOUSE
AggiesAreWe.......I would be willing to bet that Silsbee gives up more than 79 yrds rushing this week !

I predict they will give up about 208 ground yards this week....This will not even be that close..

L-Train-34
Silsbee- 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BIG HOUSE" post="839808" timestamp="1283703993"]
AggiesAreWe.......I would be willing to bet that Silsbee gives up more than 79 yrds rushing this week !

I predict they will give up about 208 ground yards this week....This will not even be that close..

L-Train-34
Silsbee- 13
[/quote] :o :o :o    ;D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lumberton by 7 or less. This will be a close one, but I think we have the intangibles, and big play potential at any time. We arent a one trick pony as some people have eluded to, we can throw it with the best of em, Pace doesnt miss anything and hughes is as accurate as anyone with time to throw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="badndn" post="839042" timestamp="1283632770"]
[quote author=SgtRey link=topic=72485.msg838971#msg838971 date=1283628726]
I have to give the edge to the more expirienced QB...Hughes...Lumberton by a 7 or less..
[/quote]
I agree. Gonna be close.

Didn't the LTrain do this last year also to start out the season?
[/quote]
Yes, yes we did and had it not been for the fence around the stadium, the Raiders probably would have ran JJ all the way back to Silsbee, their rushing yardage from last year per Ipreps 22/-42 and the minus is not a mistake.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW! Lumberton smack talk????? Please! Silsbee wins this game close 26-21. Lumberton has a good run game but  Silsbee's air attack and zone read will prove to be too much. I remember when we use to play Lumberton back in early 80's 90's and the score was like 55-14 Silsbee. How times have changed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BIG HOUSE" post="839808" timestamp="1283703993"]
AggiesAreWe.......I would be willing to bet that Silsbee gives up more than 79 yrds rushing this week !

I predict they will give up about 208 ground yards this week....This will not even be that close..

L-Train-34
Silsbee- 13
[/quote]
::)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...