Jump to content

When the Lee Ganders drop to 4A, where do they go?


Guest Ranger83

Recommended Posts

Guest Ranger83

If things hold as they are, Lee will drop down to 4A in this years realignment. My questions are: 1) How would they fit in 19-4A? 2) Who leaves in 19-4A?

IMO, their talent level drops off tremendously next year. They will be a "middle of the road" 4A school at best. I do not believe the drop will help them at all.

I would think that North Forrest would move up to 5A and that REL would assume their spot. GCM will not go up to 5A until 2013. Does anyone know about the growth at Kingwood Park?

Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If things hold as they are, Lee will drop down to 4A in this years realignment. My questions are: 1) How would they fit in 19-4A? 2) Who leaves in 19-4A?

IMO, their talent level drops off tremendously next year. They will be a "middle of the road" 4A school at best. I do not believe the drop will help them at all.

I would think that North Forrest would move up to 5A and that REL would assume their spot. GCM will not go up to 5A until 2013. Does anyone know about the growth at Kingwood Park?

Discuss.

No telling what the UIL will decide, but there are  alot of rumors like Lee going to 4A, North Forest going to 5A, Huffman coming back to 4A, Splendora getting close to 4A, BH going East, Dayton going East Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. We will see in January it should be interesting and I'm sure the UIL will shock everyone ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If things hold as they are, Lee will drop down to 4A in this years realignment. My questions are: 1) How would they fit in 19-4A? 2) Who leaves in 19-4A?

IMO, their talent level drops off tremendously next year. They will be a "middle of the road" 4A school at best. I do not believe the drop will help them at all.

I would think that North Forrest would move up to 5A and that REL would assume their spot. GCM will not go up to 5A until 2013. Does anyone know about the growth at Kingwood Park?

Discuss.

No telling what the UIL will decide, but there are  alot of rumors like Lee going to 4A, North Forest going to 5A, Huffman coming back to 4A, Splendora getting close to 4A, BH going East, Dayton going East Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. We will see in January it should be interesting and I'm sure the UIL will shock everyone ;D

Yeah they will throw a monkey wrench in everything, the UIL just likes to toy with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey dayton, you had a couple of good years over here, but 20-4A has knocked you out of the playoffs several times :)

This is true, but District(with the exception of that little mishap in L-Town) was a cake walk the 2 years we were there. The Central game in 2006 and Lumberton in 2007 was the only resistance we had in that district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...