Iran War Update

[Reagan]

20 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

Sounds like a big win to me! Sarcasm

The bots are all giddy inside 😂

Wait, you must be giddy then, because you are the bot!  

[Porter]

1 hour ago, Reagan said:

Wait, you must be giddy then, because you are the bot!  

😂 

 

[Boyz N Da Hood]

8 hours ago, Porter said:

😂

 

MAGA and bots 😂

Real conservatives and the rest of the world shaking their heads

I honestly feel bad for Reagan, biggest man crush on sleepy Donald that I've ever seen.. dude foams at the mouth daily to talk about him.. he/she has that defend by all means mantra lol

[baddog]

1 hour ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

MAGA and bots 😂

Real conservatives and the rest of the world shaking their heads

I honestly feel bad for Reagan, biggest man crush on sleepy Donald that I've ever seen.. dude foams at the mouth daily to talk about him.. he/she has that defend by all means mantra lol

And you’re the one who cried about personal attacks. That’s all you do. Smoaky would be proud. You’re just part of the hypocrite cult. Got it.

[Porter]

 

[OlDawg]

Still to early to decide if this effort was a success or failure. That won't be known until the formal agreement is signed at least a couple months from now. If there really are snap inspections and full access by IAEA, and IAEA supervises dilution of current material, it could be deemed successful from the nuclear threat aspect.

I also still say, the Strait--thus Iran--has lost it's bargaining power for the future. Supply chains will no longer rely so much on passage through the Strait for the bulk of their needs. This is an outcome that wasn't discussed as a goal. It's an unintended consequence. But, it's a definite positive for the U.S.

The Administration lucked out, and backed into this one.

[Porter]

Trump trying to take his exit from the Iran War. Lol

 

[DCT]

5 hours ago, OlDawg said:

Still to early to decide if this effort was a success or failure. That won't be known until the formal agreement is signed at least a couple months from now. If there really are snap inspections and full access by IAEA, and IAEA supervises dilution of current material, it could be deemed successful from the nuclear threat aspect.

I also still say, the Strait--thus Iran--has lost it's bargaining power for the future. Supply chains will no longer rely so much on passage through the Strait for the bulk of their needs. This is an outcome that wasn't discussed as a goal. It's an unintended consequence. But, it's a definite positive for the U.S.

The Administration lucked out, and backed into this one.

No different then the Obama deal. 

[OlDawg]

49 minutes ago, DCT said:

No different then the Obama deal. 

Wrong. JCPOA didn't have snap inspections of any sites, or destruction of existing enriched nuclear material. In fact, it included terms that required giving notice to Iran about upcoming inspections, and even allowed them to self report enrichment.

JCPOA was a big, fat nothingburger. It's yet to be seen what this will turn into.

[DCT]

1 hour ago, OlDawg said:

Wrong. JCPOA didn't have snap inspections of any sites, or destruction of existing enriched nuclear material. In fact, it included terms that required giving notice to Iran about upcoming inspections, and even allowed them to self report enrichment.

JCPOA was a big, fat nothingburger. It's yet to be seen what this will turn into.

So are you saying this MOU is a better deal?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Boyz N Da Hood]

 

[OlDawg]

16 hours ago, DCT said:

So are you saying this MOU is a better deal?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I'm saying the MOU isn't an agreement that's binding in any fashion. It's nothing more than a 'pinkie promise.'