The Devil Went Down to Georgia

[Reagan]

4 hours ago, Big girl said:

Who didnt use due process

Yobama!  So, why is it a problem now?!

[baddog]

I think this fits here. Sound familiar?

 

[Reagan]

 

 

[Big girl]

On 2/13/2026 at 1:07 PM, Reagan said:

Yobama!  So, why is it a problem now?!

Yes, he did. People has trials before they were deported, except when they were caught at the border, which was considered an expedited deportation. And no one was executed in broad daylight during Obama's tenure.

[Big girl]

On 2/11/2026 at 2:41 PM, bullets13 said:

As a somewhat moderate conservative, I feel voter ID laws is the most common-sense thing that can be done to ensure the integrity of our elections.  Eliminating mail-in options for anyone who's not overseas in the military would help a lot as well. 

If I need a birth certificate to vote, then I won't be able to. My last name on my birth certificate does not match my current last name, because I am married. What is the solution do this problem?

[Reagan]

 

Hummmm!

@UT alum         What say you?

[Reagan]

More votes than people!  This could finally SOLVE the 2020 election fraud debate.

@Big girl  @UT alum  @Boyz N Da Hood        In the end, the truth will always win out!

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

 

Hummmm!

@UT alum         What say you?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

An error. Like the apes on Truth Social. Mistake. Corrected. Read the local news reporting, not some X head.

[UT alum]

1 hour ago, Reagan said:

More votes than people!  This could finally SOLVE the 2020 election fraud debate.

@Big girl  @UT alum  @Boyz N Da Hood        In the end, the truth will always win out!

And you associate truth with Glenn Beck?

[LumRaiderFan]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

An error. Like the apes on Truth Social. Mistake. Corrected. Read the local news reporting, not some X head.

Database glitch, lol.

[UT alum]

15 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Database glitch, lol.

Works for your side.

[Reagan]

 

Why are 25 States refusing to clean their voter rolls?!

@UT alum

[Reagan]

Illegals are counted in the census then they're being counted as electoral college votes!  So they are there for participating in federal elections.

[Porter]

3 hours ago, Reagan said:

 

Why are 25 States refusing to clean their voter rolls?!

@UT alum

Because they’d lose their communist grip on their states. It’s called election fraud. That’s the only way Democrats can win. They  can’t win in the arena of ideas and debate.

[DCT]

18 hours ago, Reagan said:

More votes than people!  This could finally SOLVE the 2020 election fraud debate.

@Big girl  @UT alum  @Boyz N Da Hood        In the end, the truth will always win out!

Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, and Utah audited millions of voters and found almost no actual instances of voting by noncitizens. Even the Cato Institute—a libertarian think tank—is calling out Trump’s lies.

[Reagan]

7 hours ago, Reagan said:

Illegals are counted in the census then they're being counted as electoral college votes!  So they are there for participating in federal elections.

@DCT  Just one instance where illegals effect federal elections.  True or false?

@UT alum

[Reagan]

37 minutes ago, DCT said:

Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, and Utah audited millions of voters and found almost no actual instances of voting by noncitizens. Even the Cato Institute—a libertarian think tank—is calling out Trump’s lies.

What about the 25 States that won’t clean up their voter rolls?  Must be a reason!

[baddog]

Democrats requiring proof. Will wonders never cease? They don’t require one smidgeon of proof to go after Trump, just allegations. Lmao.

[Reagan]

57 minutes ago, DCT said:

Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, and Utah audited millions of voters and found almost no actual instances of voting by noncitizens. Even the Cato Institute—a libertarian think tank—is calling out Trump’s lies.

Did you say there’s no instances of non-citizens voting?!  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, DCT said:

Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, and Utah audited millions of voters and found almost no actual instances of voting by noncitizens. Even the Cato Institute—a libertarian think tank—is calling out Trump’s lies.

Found almost no actual instances?

🙄

[Reagan]

25 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Found almost no actual instances?

🙄

Is that like being a little bit pregnant?  LOL!

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

@DCT  Just one instance where illegals effect federal elections.  True or false?

@UT alum

Incomprehensible. Illegals are not electoral votes. Electoral votes are apportioned based on each state’s congressional representation as of the census, which was 2020. This was after four years of Biden’s “disastrous” immigration policies. Texas gained 5 seats after the census. 5 Republican seats. California lost seats. If rampant illegals were impacting electoral votes, wouldn’t one reasonably expect the opposite to happen? People pushing these totally illogical scenarios sow seeds of mistrust in our electoral system. Good job, comrade.

[Reagan]

8 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Incomprehensible. Illegals are not electoral votes. Electoral votes are apportioned based on each state’s congressional representation as of the census, which was 2020. This was after four years of Biden’s “disastrous” immigration policies. Texas gained 5 seats after the census. 5 Republican seats. California lost seats. If rampant illegals were impacting electoral votes, wouldn’t one reasonably expect the opposite to happen? People pushing these totally illogical scenarios sow seeds of mistrust in our electoral system. Good job, comrade.

The census is based on how many residents you have in a State.  A State's electoral count is based on its representation in Congress.  The more people in a State, the more congressional seats that State gets -- the more electoral votes per that State.  In a census, if you count, say, 1 million illegals, then your electoral count goes up.  I have already stated that Minnesota has basically already lost one congressional seat due to ICE getting rid of the illegals.  Which will in turn lose an electoral vote.  With all the people leaving California and when we do not count illegals in the next census -- California is in a world of hurt!  But they aren't the only ones!  The only problem is people don't understand how the electoral count works!  Now they do!

[UT alum]

40 minutes ago, Reagan said:

The census is based on how many residents you have in a State.  A State's electoral count is based on its representation in Congress.  The more people in a State, the more congressional seats that State gets -- the more electoral votes per that State.  In a census, if you count, say, 1 million illegals, then your electoral count goes up.  I have already stated that Minnesota has basically already lost one congressional seat due to ICE getting rid of the illegals.  Which will in turn lose an electoral vote.  With all the people leaving California and when we do not count illegals in the next census -- California is in a world of hurt!  But they aren't the only ones!  The only problem is people don't understand how the electoral count works!  Now they do!

You need to look into making Swiss cheese. The number of residents is based on the census, not vice versa. If what you say is true, why did Texas gain 5 Republican seats? Illegals may change the makeup of a state’s population, but if they aren’t voting, what difference does it make. If they were flooding in during the Biden presidency AND voting, Texas should’ve gone royal blue. It didn’t. Swiss cheese, I’m telling you.

[DCT]

3 hours ago, Reagan said:

Is that like being a little bit pregnant?  LOL!

Was the 2024 election stolen and rigged?