Ken Paxton Would Crush RINO Cornyn in Texas Senate Primary, Data Confirms.

[Reagan]

 

Paxton!

[Reagan]

Ken Paxton on course for John Cornyn runoff in Texas Senate Republican primary: internal poll.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Paxton!!

 

[Reagan]

 

Get out and vote!

[tvc184]

I am guessing maybe Paxton with 43%, Cornyn with 34% and Hunt with the scraps around 20%.

Paxton in the run off 54% to 46%. 

[Reagan]

 

This is why Cornyn needs to go.  This is why Cornyn WILL go!   

Vote Paxton!

[TheMissingBand]

The sad thing is that the best Dem candidate (Talarico) won’t face the best Rep candidate (Cornyn) in November because the parties are both being ran by the extremists on either side of the aisle. 
 

There’s nothing more ironic (and moronic) than watching so called evangelicals line up to support candidates like “Our General” Ken Paxton who have a complete lack of morals and decency.  Intelligent people realize that figures like Paxton and Trump are simply saying what the morons want to hear in return for their votes. My left boot is more ethical than Paxton.  

[DCT]

On 2/13/2026 at 5:47 PM, Reagan said:

 

Paxton!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

OK.

[Reagan]

 

Paxton!

[Boyz N Da Hood]

6 minutes ago, Reagan said:

 

Paxton!

James will be the next president!

[LumRaiderFan]

7 hours ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

James will be the next president!

Another prediction!

😂😂😂😂

[Reagan]

11 hours ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

James will be the next president!

Did you misspell it?  Did you mean to spell it Jasmine?!  😏😁

[DCT]

On 2/13/2026 at 5:47 PM, Reagan said:

 

Paxton!

More news out of Texas.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Boyz N Da Hood]

5 hours ago, Reagan said:

Did you misspell it?  Did you mean to spell it Jasmine?!  😏😁

Nope.. correctly spelled

[UT alum]

On 2/5/2026 at 11:10 PM, tvc184 said:

None of which addresses the topic of the thread or my comment.

 The thread is about Paxton v. Cornyn and my comment was about RINOs. All of the claimed RINOs almost always end up voting in lockstep with the party.

Your response is, Orange Man Bad!!

Stunning! I never saw that coming. 🤣

Then why you talking about Trump if your post was Cornyn/paxton?

[tvc184]

19 hours ago, UT alum said:

Then why you talking about Trump if your post was Cornyn/paxton?

Even more comedy.

I didn’t bring up Trump, you did.

To refresh our memory, this was your quote that I answered:

Uhhh…yes. Trump has driven divisions that were incomprehensible 15 years ago. Never has such a liar occupied the Oval Office. Never has anyone in the Oval Office, including Nixon been so focused on themselves at the expense of the Constitution, and reason in general for that matter. He is consequential in a bad way.
 

That is why my response was, this thread is about Paxton and Cornyn. Your comment that I answered never mentioned Paxton or Cornyn or anything to do with the topic of the thread. You only mentioned Trump, the Oval Office, Nixon and the Constitution.

I understand that it might be hard for you to follow along. When you’re so eaten up with Trump that you completely go off topic and never mention the intent of the thread.

It’s okay, what did Trump do this time? Did he hurt your feelings in the SoTU?