DCT Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, mat said: I am all in on names, arrests, convictions and prison time. However, reality is, it will be hard to get a true conviction without victims testifying against high powered legal teams. May be hard to get a conviction, much less multiples. Trump was convicted of 34 counts by a jury of his peers. Quote
OlDawg Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, Reagan said: Sounds awful familiar!! If this is all coordinated, I wonder who is pulling the strings? Any thoughts? Read up on Barak (not THAT Barak.) Former Israeli PM. Interesting substack article. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Reagan 1 Quote
Reagan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, DCT said: Trump was convicted of 34 counts by a jury of his peers. You KNOW it wasn't HIS peers. He doesn't have any peers in NY City or Washington, DC. That's the whole folly of the situation! Quote
DCT Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, Reagan said: You KNOW it wasn't HIS peers. He doesn't have any peers in NY City or Washington, DC. That's the whole folly of the situation! My point is there is a possibility of a conviction with enough proof. Quote
Reagan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 22 minutes ago, DCT said: My point is there is a possibility of a conviction with enough proof. OK, I see. DCT 1 Quote
thetragichippy Posted 59 minutes ago Report Posted 59 minutes ago 58 minutes ago, DCT said: This is about children! First you didn’t address my point, you went straight to emotion. Second, if it was truly about the children, accusers, “victims” could have came out 10 years ago, or at least during the Biden administration…. I’m sure the Biden administration would of had no problem letting them wear their t-shirts. Here is your second change to address my point about the victims in danger no matter how the names come out…. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 58 minutes ago Report Posted 58 minutes ago 44 minutes ago, DCT said: My point is there is a possibility of a conviction with enough proof. Or a Judge who will be one sided and go against norms to get a conviction….as in Trumps case baddog 1 Quote
UT alum Posted 55 minutes ago Report Posted 55 minutes ago 44 minutes ago, Reagan said: You KNOW it wasn't HIS peers. He doesn't have any peers in NY City or Washington, DC. That's the whole folly of the situation! You keep smacking your own self in the face. Look up the definition of peer. Trump is a native of NYC. Are you suggesting he is peerless? Quote
thetragichippy Posted 52 minutes ago Report Posted 52 minutes ago Interesting how law and proof work…. OlDawg 1 Quote
Reagan Posted 34 minutes ago Report Posted 34 minutes ago 19 minutes ago, UT alum said: You keep smacking your own self in the face. Look up the definition of peer. Trump is a native of NYC. Are you suggesting he is peerless? Among the commies in Washington, DC and NY City, yes, he is peerless. So would any other conservative in that same situation. baddog 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.