Jump to content

Breaking News - TRUMP to release EPSTEIN files and client list!

HuntersLaptop2028

By HuntersLaptop2028
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Boyz N Da Hood

Boyz N Da Hood

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, DCT said:

BBC News
Trump mentioned hundreds of times in latest filespublished at 17:36

17:36

US President Donald Trump is mentioned hundreds of times in the newly released files, according to the justice department’s website.

Among the new documents is a list compiled by the FBI last year of allegations made against Trump by callers to its national Threat Operation Center tip line. Many of these appear to be based on unverified tips received by the agency, and were made without supporting evidence. 

It is not clear why the FBI compiled the list or when the tips were received. The document was included in emails sent by officials in the FBI’s New York field office in August 2025.

The list includes numerous allegations of sexual abuse made against Trump, Epstein and other high-profile figures.

Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein and has not been accused of any crimes by Epstein's victims. 

When asked about the latest allegations, both the White House and justice department referred media outlets to a line in the press release accompanying the new batch of files.

"Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election," it reads. "To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponised against President Trump already."

End of BBC News

Polls don’t matter to some but if they are an indicator Trump/ Miller are getting desperate.   He won’t let go of  2020 election. Trump suffers from insomnia and BDS. These files that have been released are tale telling  Seizing the voter roll in Florida is a hell Mary and a sign of desperation.  
 

Patel lied under oath. Patel was accused of misleading Congress regarding the release of Jeffrey Epstein files, specifically claiming "no credible information" existed that Epstein trafficked women to others, which directly contradicted testimony from survivors. 

But but but he kicked em from mar a lago lol 🤡's

  • Replies 975
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

thetragichippy
thetragichippy

@Reagan - what is your favorite charity? 

Boyz N Da Hood
Boyz N Da Hood

Biden and many D's probably on there! Musk made that comment for a reason.. this is politics, u dont make a comment like that with no evidence JMO

thetragichippy
thetragichippy

If you care to look at morals of past Presidents, even the good ones had issues.....right back to our first one who was a slave owner.  Our first lady was a successful model and speaks 6 language

Posted Images

DCT

DCT

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

But but but he kicked em from mar a lago lol 🤡's

Kash Patel played defense for Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking ring by claiming that not only did the disgraced financier have no client list—he had no clients at all.

Speaking during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Republican Senator John Kennedy 

This is the hidden content, please
: “Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to, besides himself?”

“Himself,” Patel 

This is the hidden content, please
. “There is no credible information, none. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information that we have—again—is limited.” 

DCT

DCT

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, baddog said:

Emails have absolutely no bearing on guilt. Didn’t we learn anything from Hillary’s 30,000 deletions?

court papers filed in December, Maxwell alleged that several accomplices of Epstein made deals with lawyers representing some of the late sex offender's victims after his abuse allegations emerged.

 

Although she did not mention any names, Maxwell claimed that the number of individuals involved was at least 25, and that they "could equally be considered as co-conspirators," just as she has been labeled by the court.

In the same documents, Maxwell further alleged the existence of four Epstein employees who were named in the sex-trafficking indictment that led to his arrest in 2019.

"None of these men have been prosecuted, and none has been revealed to [Maxwell]; she would have called them as witnesses had she known," Maxwell said on the matter, per the New York Post (https://nypost.com/2026/01/29/us-news/ghislaine-maxwell-claims-25-jeffrey-epstein-accomplices-reached-secret-settlements-after-abuse-allegations-court-papers/).

She then stated that the fact these individuals were not prosecuted but instead reached deals, along with her earlier claims of a biased jury, proves that she was not tried fairly.

 

They will try and spin this but remember she was worthy enough to move from a FCI to a prison camp with people serving 11 years are less and have no public safety factor placed on them.  She does have a public safety factor of sex offender.

baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted

Sex traffickers, accomplices, etc…..smoke and mirrors to sell news articles. I can promise you that if Maxwell had the goods on anyone, she would not even be in prison.

Here’s something to ponder. Does anyone believe that Jeffrey Epstein is the only wealthy, sex trafficker who furnished young women for the elites? Does anyone think that Epstein and Maxwell did this by themselves. It’s probably a huge, global network with more Epsteins than we care to count. Look how many illegals have sex trafficking charges. Unbelievable…
 

For me, emails with locker room jargon are not going to convict anyone. Some of the pics can be incriminating, but the videos will bring forth the truth. Also, victim testimony/charges will bring convictions. 

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, DCT said:

court papers filed in December, Maxwell alleged that several accomplices of Epstein made deals with lawyers representing some of the late sex offender's victims after his abuse allegations emerged.

 

Although she did not mention any names, Maxwell claimed that the number of individuals involved was at least 25, and that they "could equally be considered as co-conspirators," just as she has been labeled by the court.

In the same documents, Maxwell further alleged the existence of four Epstein employees who were named in the sex-trafficking indictment that led to his arrest in 2019.

"None of these men have been prosecuted, and none has been revealed to [Maxwell]; she would have called them as witnesses had she known," Maxwell said on the matter, per the New York Post (https://nypost.com/2026/01/29/us-news/ghislaine-maxwell-claims-25-jeffrey-epstein-accomplices-reached-secret-settlements-after-abuse-allegations-court-papers/).

She then stated that the fact these individuals were not prosecuted but instead reached deals, along with her earlier claims of a biased jury, proves that she was not tried fairly.

 

They will try and spin this but remember she was worthy enough to move from a FCI to a prison camp with people serving 11 years are less and have no public safety factor placed on them.  She does have a public safety factor of sex offender.

Weren’t you reminded about making sure you give credit to who you copy and paste from?  

DCT

DCT

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Reagan said:

Weren’t you reminded about making sure you give credit to who you copy and paste from?  

Are you serious? The body clearly states the New York Post. Like I said, you would try to spin it. Lol

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, DCT said:

Are you serious? The body clearly states the New York Post. Like I said, you would try to spin it. Lol

That only gives credit to one quote.  What about the rest of it that’s not in quotation marks?  It’s like whoever you are copying and pasting from is quoting the NY Post.  

DCT

DCT

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Reagan said:

That only gives credit to one quote.  What about the rest of it that’s not in quotation marks?  It’s like whoever you are copying and pasting from is quoting the NY Post.  

I worked for DOJ so the statement was mine.  The Public Safety Factor is part of sentence computation.  Which is calculated.  When calculating an individuals points and custody classification,  Maxwell should be in/custody not  out/custody. To receive out custody its apparent the visit that she had with Trump staff was enough to move her to out custody which has never been done.  In December she petitioned for a new trial because she alleges there are 25 conspirators.

They will try and spin this but remember she was worthy enough to move from a FCI to a prison camp with people serving 11 years are less and have no public safety factor placed on them.  She does have a public safety factor of sex offender.

UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, DCT said:

I worked for DOJ so the statement was mine.  The Public Safety Factor is part of sentence computation.  Which is calculated.  When calculating an individuals points and custody classification,  Maxwell should be in/custody not  out/custody. To receive out custody its apparent the visit that she had with Trump staff was enough to move her to out custody which has never been done.  In December she petitioned for a new trial because she alleges there are 25 conspirators.

 

They will try and spin this but remember she was worthy enough to move from a FCI to a prison camp with people serving 11 years are less and have no public safety factor placed on them.  She does have a public safety factor of sex offender.

The best burn I’ve seen since I been on here. You don’t need no stinkin’ quotation marks. YOU WORKED THERE!!! I love it!

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, UT alum said:

The best burn I’ve seen since I been on here. You don’t need no stinkin’ quotation marks. YOU WORKED THERE!!! I love it!

LOL!  Those are not @DCT words.  The print states it’s a copy and paste.  Quotations are needed when using other people’s words and then give credit.  You should know this!

DCT

DCT

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Reagan said:

LOL!  Those are not @DCT words.  The print states it’s a copy and paste.  

Is Trump guilty?  Is he protecting someone?  Why is it you can be numb when it comes to kids? But if it was Obama or Newsome who were accused of inappropriate behavior with kids, there would be no defense..  

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DCT said:

Is Trump guilty?  Is he protecting someone?  Why is it you can be numb when it comes to kids? But if it was Obama or Newsome who were accused of inappropriate behavior with kids, there would be no defense..  

Again — Trump is not guilty!  Need to stop beating this dead horse.

BTW — this is what your print looks like when it’s your own words!  

DCT

DCT

Posted
Posted
Just now, Reagan said:

Again — Trump is not guilty!  Need to stop beating this dead horse.

BTW — this is what your print looks like when it’s your own words!  

The files that were released today say different.  

DCT

DCT

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Ok, I’ll bite: Trump is guilty of what?

It’s posted all over the media today read it. Some documents were released and then retracted and removed quickly by the administration.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,646
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Horns2348
    Newest Member
    Horns2348
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...