Breaking News - TRUMP to release EPSTEIN files and client list!

[DCT]

3 minutes ago, baddog said:

What does this have to do with Epstein files?

Here is a list of articles from this author pertaining to Trump, reading the headlines  tells you all you need to know, lol.

From LT.

[DCT]

1 minute ago, DCT said:

Here is a list of articles from this author pertaining to Trump, reading the headlines  tells you all you need to know, lol.

From LT.

All you had to do was read the post.

[baddog]

Dude, you are seriously losing it. Neither article mentioned Epstein. You jack your own threads and quote yourself. 

[LumRaiderFan]

4 hours ago, baddog said:

Dude, you are seriously losing it. Neither article mentioned Epstein. You jack your own threads and quote yourself. 

Impossible to follow the logic.

I’m gonna take a poll to see if I should try.

[DCT]

3 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Impossible to follow the logic.

I’m gonna take a poll to see if I should try.

The same reason you brought light to the other articles.  You pointed out other articles.  I replied you left off one.  Your President has been making major headlines daily.  He doesn’t want you to keep talking about Epstein.  He ordered his name to be scrubbed from the files. 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

His Great Department of war killed alleged drug traffickers who were attempting to bring drugs into the U.S. However, Trump releases a King Pin because he was treated harshly.   I assume you and Regan feel our justice system was too harsh on the convicted drug trafficker.

i am looking forward to midterms.  I see the 🌊.  Voters voices will be heard in November.  Tennessee will be heard on 12-2-2025.

www.yahoo.com

Pollsters are giving Democrats a 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 of taking control of the House after next year’s midterms, but a victory on Tuesday in Tennessee could also help set up a scenario in which they may not have to wait that long.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

DOGE didn’t have this in his wasteful spending.

[thetragichippy]

18 hours ago, DCT said:

He ordered his name to be scrubbed from the files. 

There are no "files" FYI

The bill that was passed HR 4405 had all Democrats voting YES for the bill - So every Democrat voted YES, and all but one Republican voted YES to give Pam Bondi the authority to redact whatever she feels necessary to protect the innocent. 

So, if you are unhappy with transparency, or think Pam is hiding something, you can blame every Democrat in the house and senate......

 

[DCT]

2 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

There are no "files" FYI

The bill that was passed HR 4405 had all Democrats voting YES for the bill - So every Democrat voted YES, and all but one Republican voted YES to give Pam Bondi the authority to redact whatever she feels necessary to protect the innocent. 

So, if you are unhappy with transparency, or think Pam is hiding something, you can blame every Democrat in the house and senate......

 

Release the list of people who harmed kids!!  Put this cover up to rest.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Sick dirty old rich men don’t have an alliance to a particular party.  While in prison there’s only one party and that is inmate. Unless your name is Maxwell.

[thetragichippy]

2 hours ago, DCT said:

Release the list of people who harmed kids!!  Put this cover up to rest.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Sick dirty old rich men don’t have an alliance to a particular party.  While in prison there’s only one party and that is inmate. Unless your name is Maxwell.

So, try and think rational.

1. You want a “list” of all the people that hurt kids. Do you honestly think if this “list” was real, the Biden DOJ would have sat on it for 4 years? Why have you not called specifically for, why have DEMOCRATS not called specifically for  Merrick Garland to confirm or deny? 
 

2. For a second, let’s forget about the above. Since no one has been charged or convicted, you think it would wise to release a list of people and claim they sexually abused kids without any evidence? People did go to that island not knowing the pedo stuff….a few easy ones, Stephen Hawkins, Lex Wexner and Naomi Campbell.  Who gets to decide which names get released….well, that would be Pam Bondi - 100% of the Democrats voted she could do that.
 

3. The “victims” (the same victims that said they never seen or heard of Trump being inappropriate) claim they have a list. Why don’t THEY release if they REALLY want justice and not just money.

 Maybe you can explain how you want this “list” of folks that harmed children and why you are not calling for Garlands head if this “list” exist.

I consider myself a pretty common sense guy, if I thought there was really a list, I would want the victims to confirm….and btw, if they KNOW of a crime, Non disclosure agreements cannot legally conceal crimes such ad sex trafficking or assault….so why are the victims not releasing the folks that hurt children?

Can you answer any of the above questions?

[LumRaiderFan]

15 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

So, try and think rational.

1. You want a “list” of all the people that hurt kids. Do you honestly think if this “list” was real, the Biden DOJ would have sat on it for 4 years? Why have you not called specifically for, why have DEMOCRATS not called specifically for  Merrick Garland to confirm or deny? 
 

2. For a second, let’s forget about the above. Since no one has been charged or convicted, you think it would wise to release a list of people and claim they sexually abused kids without any evidence? People did go to that island not knowing the pedo stuff….a few easy ones, Stephen Hawkins, Lex Wexner and Naomi Campbell.  Who gets to decide which names get released….well, that would be Pam Bondi - 100% of the Democrats voted she could do that.
 

3. The “victims” (the same victims that said they never seen or heard of Trump being inappropriate) claim they have a list. Why don’t THEY release if they REALLY want justice and not just money.

 Maybe you can explain how you want this “list” of folks that harmed children and why you are not calling for Garlands head if this “list” exist.

I consider myself a pretty common sense guy, if I thought there was really a list, I would want the victims to confirm….and btw, if they KNOW of a crime, Non disclosure agreements cannot legally conceal crimes such ad sex trafficking or assault….so why are the victims not releasing the folks that hurt children?

Can you answer any of the above questions?

He’s looking for one name.

[Reagan]

 

Good point!  Thoughts?!