Jump to content

*OTHER TOURAMENT GAME THREAD, Dec. 7-9*/Post updates, scores here


Recommended Posts

James Gamble (Port Arthur Memorial), LaGrange, La. (Beaumont United), New Braunfels (Beaumont West Brook), Cypress (Summer Creek), Montgomery (Huntsville, Porter, Lumberton), Navasota (Baytown Lee, Hamshire-Fannett, Huffman), Brazos (Liberty, Tarkington), Central Heights (Central Heights) Mt. Pleasant (Hemphill), Frankston (East Chambers, Woden), Centerville (Anderson-Shiro, Crockett, Trinity), Jewett Leon (New Waverly), Mount Enterprise (Broaddus), High Island (High Island, Sabine Pass), Alto (Zavalla)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thursday schedule for coverage area teams:

LaGrange, La

7pm         Hamilton vs. Beaumont United

 

New Braunfels

3pm       Austin Regents vs. Beaumont West Brook

 

Cypress

5pm        Langham Creek vs. Summer Creek

 

Montgomery

10:20am       Huntsville vs. Bryan

11:40am       Porter vs. New Caney

2:20pm        Lumberton vs. Magnolia West

2:20pm        Kempner vs. Porter

5:50pm        Huntsville vs. Lumberton

 

Navasota

11am      Hamshire-Fannett vs. Brenham

11am      Giddings vs. Baytown Lee

12:30pm  Huffman vs. Navasota

2pm        Baytown Lee vs. Hamshire-Fannett

3:30pm   Madisonville vs. Huffman

 

Mt. Pleasant

2pm          Hemphill vs. Hughes Springs

 

Frankston

11:30am      Eustace vs. Woden

3:20pm        Woden vs. Frankston

4:40pm      East Chambers vs. New Summerfield

 

Jewett Leon

10am          New Waverly vs. Normangee

1pm           North Zulch vs. New Waverly

 

Mount Enterprise

6pm       Cushing vs. Broaddus

 

Alto

9am           Kennard vs. Zavalla

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankston

Final

Woden                       64

Eustace                       41

 

East Chambers             75

New Summerfield        16

 

Frankston                  51

Woden                      50

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Montgomery

Bryan               63

Huntsville         56

 

Porter                 59

New Caney         41

 

Lumberton         44

Magnolia West   52

 

Kempner               77

Porter                    31

 

Huntsville                72

Lumberton              41

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Montgomery

Bryan               63

Huntsville         56

 

Porter                 59

New Caney         41

 

Lumberton         44

Magnolia West   52

 

Kempner               77

Porter                    31

 

Huntsville                72

Lumberton              41

It was 68-47

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...