Jump to content

3/23- NEDERLAND- 14 GALENA PARK-4 FINAL


KF89

Recommended Posts

G.P. gets 2 on, Ned Int. walks Ochoa for the 2nd time to load bases with 1 out, Corkoran then strikes out next 2 batters for the 2nd time to end G.P.’s 3rd inn. 5-1 Ned going bottom 3 

Each team has 4 hits, Ned has 1 error 

Ned- Corkoran has 7 K’s on 62 pitches 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

G.P. walks the bases loaded, Hollyfield for Ned drives a pitch over the centerfielders head for 2 rbi double to make the score 9-3 2 walks later scores 1 more run to make the score 10-3 Ned after 4 innings 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ned makes pitching change with 2 outs in the top of the 5th. Baker in to pitch for Corkoran with 2 outs & runner on 3rd 

Corkoran goes 5 2/3 inn, 10 K’s, 7 hits, 1 BB, 108 pitches 

Baker gives up a 2B that scores a runner from 3rd, then gets a strike out to end G.P.’s 5th inn. 
10-4 Ned going to the bottom of the 5th 

Corkoran leads off the bottom of 5th with a 2B 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • KF89 changed the title to 3/23- NEDERLAND- 14 GALENA PARK-4 FINAL

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...