Jump to content

""Official Mid County Madness Thread" PNG/Ned Predictons


Guest TravelingBandsman

Recommended Posts

you better put a helmet on that indian there...

...png may need 12 men on the field to stop the Nederland Offense lol

In all honesty, it should be a close game. PNG has good athletes in the secondary to stack up against the Bulldog passing attack. Nederland's running game may be the determining factor.

The PNG offense is going to need to surprise Nederland with some sort of trickery of play-action. This Nederland Defense is fast and strong...

Regardless of the outcome, Cherokee will be played 50+ times.

My Prediction

Dogs - 31

PNG - 21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2006          Ned        31-24

2005          NED        35-28

2004          NED        19-13

2003          PNG          23-14

2002          NED        22-19

2001          NED        42-10

2000          NED        21-19

1999          PNG          31-8

1998          PNG          28-7

1997          NED          28-7

1996          PNG          17-14

1995          NED        28-25

1994          NED          13-7

1993          NED        28-14

1992          PNG          54-0

1991          PNG          23-6

1990          PNG          27-0

1989          PNG          41-7

1988          NED          29-0

1987          TIE          14-14

1986          NED        21-12

1985          PNG            3-0

1984          NED          13-7

1968          TIE          35-35

1967          PNG            6-0

1966          PNG          16-15

1965          TIE            0-0

1964          NED          22-6

1963          PNG          22-21

1962          NED        21-12

1961          PNG          14-12

1960          NED          27-6

1959          NED          14-0

1958          PNG          36-22

1957          NED        40-14

1956          NED          19-6

1955          NED          34-6

1954          NED          27-24

1948          PNG          38-7

1947          PNG          71-0

1946          PNG          35-3

1945          NED          39-12

1944          NED          18-0

1943          TIE            7-7

1942          NED          14-0

1941          PNG            2-0

1940          TIE            0-0

1939          NED          6-0

1938          PNG          14-0

1937          NED          13-0

1936          NED        20-19

1935          PNG          27-6

1934          PNG          20-0

1933          PNG            7-0

1932          PNG          21-0

1931          PNG          32-0

1930          TIE            0-0

1930          PNG            6-0

1929          PNG          26-0

1929          PNG          20-0

1928          NED          25-0

1928          NED          31-0

1927          PNG          22-0

1927          TIE            0-0

1926          PNG            6-0

1926          PNG            6-0

1925          PNG          13-7

1925          NED          6-0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2006           Ned         31-24

2005           NED         35-28

2004           NED         19-13

2003           PNG           23-14

2002           NED         22-19

2001           NED         42-10

2000           NED         21-19

1999           PNG           31-8

1998           PNG           28-7

1997           NED           28-7

1996           PNG           17-14

1995           NED         28-25

1994           NED           13-7

1993           NED         28-14

1992           PNG           54-0

1991           PNG           23-6

1990           PNG           27-0

1989           PNG           41-7

1988           NED           29-0

1987           TIE           14-14

1986           NED         21-12

1985           PNG             3-0

1984           NED           13-7

1968           TIE           35-35

1967           PNG             6-0

1966           PNG           16-15

1965           TIE             0-0

1964           NED           22-6

1963           PNG           22-21

1962           NED         21-12

1961           PNG           14-12

1960           NED           27-6

1959           NED           14-0

1958           PNG           36-22

1957           NED         40-14

1956           NED           19-6

1955           NED           34-6

1954           NED           27-24

1948           PNG           38-7

1947           PNG           71-0

1946           PNG           35-3

1945           NED           39-12

1944           NED           18-0

1943           TIE             7-7

1942           NED           14-0

1941           PNG             2-0

1940           TIE             0-0

1939           NED           6-0

1938           PNG           14-0

1937           NED           13-0

1936           NED         20-19

1935           PNG           27-6

1934           PNG           20-0

1933           PNG             7-0

1932           PNG           21-0

1931           PNG           32-0

1930           TIE             0-0

1930           PNG             6-0

1929           PNG           26-0

1929           PNG           20-0

1928           NED           25-0

1928           NED           31-0

1927           PNG           22-0

1927           TIE             0-0

1926           PNG             6-0

1926           PNG             6-0

1925           PNG           13-7

1925           NED           6-0

Why is 1969 to 1983 missing???

1983 PNG 28-7 

1982 PNG 49-0 

1981 PNG 12-0 

1980 PNG 35-0 

1979 PNG 14-9 

1978 PNG 22-3 

1977 PNG 35-14 

1976 PNG 20-3 

1975 PNG 28-6 

1974 PNG 20-17 

1973 PNG 29-6 

1972 PNG 38-0 

1971 PNG 51-13 

1970 PNG 15-14 

1969 PNG 20-19

Nederland might be able to get a 4  year winning streak going, but getting a 19 year winning streak...

I don't think so...

Had to break my 2 week silence ban to post this "necessary" information "left out" by the Bulldog fans...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is 1969 to 1983 missing???

1983 PNG 28-7 

1982 PNG 49-0   

1981 PNG 12-0   

1980 PNG 35-0   

1979 PNG 14-9   

1978 PNG 22-3   

1977 PNG 35-14   

1976 PNG 20-3   

1975 PNG 28-6   

1974 PNG 20-17   

1973 PNG 29-6   

1972 PNG 38-0   

1971 PNG 51-13 

1970 PNG 15-14 

1969 PNG 20-19

Nederland might be able to get a 4  year winning streak going, but getting a 19 year winning streak...

I don't think so...

Had to break my 2 week silence ban to post this "necessary" information "left out" by the Bulldog fans...

So how many wins does Matt Burnett Indians have against the Dogs? I think that is more important then ancient history!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nederland might be able to get a 4  year winning streak going, but getting a 19 year winning streak...

I don't think so...

.....

Great streak. It is interesting that PN-G has to go back more than a generation to have something noteworthy to talk about. The fact that they have been owned in the 2000's seems to have escaped them.  owned.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...