Jump to content

Alto.


Recommended Posts

Alto does have an awesome program but the problem that these small schools run into against a big school is that they usually have some good athletes in the backfield that can stay away from another small schools strengths on defense by running the other way. Its tough for such a small school to have 5 big and talented lineman that can keep a bigger schools defensive players out of the backfield disrupting the offense. No disrespect but Alto could not hang with any decent average 4A school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alto in 21-3A

vs WOS

at Alto (TX)

[2006] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 34, [2006] Alto (TX) 24

at West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX)

[2006] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 35, [2006] Alto (TX) 21

at neutral site

[2006] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 34, [2006] Alto (TX) 22

Vs Silsbee

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 34, [2006] Silsbee (TX) 27

at Silsbee (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Silsbee (TX) 28

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Silsbee (TX) 28

vs Kirbyville

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 41, [2006] Kirbyville (TX) 26

at Kirbyville (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 38, [2006] Kirbyville (TX) 27

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 40, [2006] Kirbyville (TX) 27

vs orangefield

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 42, [2006] Orangefield (TX) 21

at Orangefield (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 41, [2006] Orangefield (TX) 21

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 42, [2006] Orangefield (TX) 21

vs BC

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Bridge City (TX) 14

at Bridge City (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Bridge City (TX) 17

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Bridge City (TX) 17

vs Hj

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 44, [2006] Hardin-Jefferson (Sour Lake, TX) 14

at Hardin-Jefferson (Sour Lake, TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 42, [2006] Hardin-Jefferson (Sour Lake, TX) 14

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 42, [2006] Hardin-Jefferson (Sour Lake, TX) 14

vs jasper

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 38, [2006] Jasper (TX) 12

at Jasper (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Jasper (TX) 13

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Jasper (TX) 12

vs Hf

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Hamshire-Fannett (Hamshire, TX) 7

at Hamshire-Fannett (Hamshire, TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Hamshire-Fannett (Hamshire, TX) 8

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Hamshire-Fannett (Hamshire, TX) 7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NED, BC (bay city) JT (cujo) should i go on?

Yes, please do go on because I still am not convinced.  Alto would be spread to thin against teams with more numbers and athletes just as talented.  Don't get me wrong, I think they proved last year that they had one of the most dominating teams in history...but there is a big difference between a powerhouse 1A team and a powerhouse 4A team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alto in 21-3A

vs WOS

at Alto (TX)

[2006] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 34, [2006] Alto (TX) 24

at West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX)

[2006] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 35, [2006] Alto (TX) 21

at neutral site

[2006] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 34, [2006] Alto (TX) 22

Vs Silsbee

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 34, [2006] Silsbee (TX) 27

at Silsbee (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Silsbee (TX) 28

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Silsbee (TX) 28

vs Kirbyville

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 41, [2006] Kirbyville (TX) 26

at Kirbyville (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 38, [2006] Kirbyville (TX) 27

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 40, [2006] Kirbyville (TX) 27

vs orangefield

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 42, [2006] Orangefield (TX) 21

at Orangefield (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 41, [2006] Orangefield (TX) 21

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 42, [2006] Orangefield (TX) 21

vs BC

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Bridge City (TX) 14

at Bridge City (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Bridge City (TX) 17

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Bridge City (TX) 17

vs Hj

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 44, [2006] Hardin-Jefferson (Sour Lake, TX) 14

at Hardin-Jefferson (Sour Lake, TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 42, [2006] Hardin-Jefferson (Sour Lake, TX) 14

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 42, [2006] Hardin-Jefferson (Sour Lake, TX) 14

vs jasper

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 38, [2006] Jasper (TX) 12

at Jasper (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Jasper (TX) 13

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 35, [2006] Jasper (TX) 12

vs Hf

at Alto (TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Hamshire-Fannett (Hamshire, TX) 7

at Hamshire-Fannett (Hamshire, TX)

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Hamshire-Fannett (Hamshire, TX) 8

at neutral site

[2006] Alto (TX) 31, [2006] Hamshire-Fannett (Hamshire, TX) 7

You do not play the game on paper or the computer, you play it on the field.

Alto has good 1A talent when you start playing against larger schools you are going to run into the numbers game.

Most 1A players have to play on both sides of the ball and will be eventualy be worn down.

Alto could not compete with 3A or 4A schools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK guys, being an Alto fan, I know whats realistic and what's not.  NO, a 1a team could not hang with a 4a powerhouse, although I will say Alto had players last year that could have started at the 5a level.  These guys were that good.  I do think Alto could hang with the majority of 3a schools in the area, with the exception of the Liberty Eylaus, Gilmers, WOS, ect.  I saw Rusk, Mabank, and a few other 3a's last year, and I think Alto could have beaten all of them.  When Alto was 2a, they played the likes of Diboll, Kirbyville, Tatum, Center, and others regularly and won, sometimes in a blowout.  Alto had one of them teams last year that only comes around so often.  Alto had a tough passing attack last year that teams could not much up to with the size and speed.

I think Alto would have gone a long ways in the 2a playoffs had we not dropped.  I know you can't compare teams by scores, but East Chambers was 10-0 and had to fight to beat Hemphill in the 1st round and Alto blew Hemphill out of their home stadium 42-0 ( and it could have been a lot worse ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched Alto play Hemphill last year and it was a mismatch. I am from Newton and I am sure glad we did not have to play them. They were that good. They could have hung with most 3A and a lot of 4A school. They were that good. I think they have all their defense back and boy can they hit. The Hemphill game could have easily been 54 to zip. Alto played their second team and it looked just as good as the first team. No one will beat them this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,985
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SVD Beaumont
    Newest Member
    SVD Beaumont
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Where were the 8 Omaha teams in D1's preseason top 25 poll... 2. Florida 8. A&M 9. Tennessee 13. N.C.State 14. Virginia 15. North Carolina Kentucky - unranked Florida State - unranked
    • That TDS is really flaring. Now do Biden. You have way, way, way more material. And keep that bitter "you are better than me" jealousy tone you have with Trump. You know Biden, the one you want everyone to vote for instead of Trump. Somehow you didn't acknowledge my pleas for you to die a painful death. I was quite certain that is how you would have interpreted my previous post. I guess when your focus is Trump 24/7, nothing else matters.
    • I have a better one. The point that nobody wants to acknowledge is that Dems are crossing over to vote Trump in the primaries and in the general so he will win the presidency. That way Trump will get the blame when the Dems implement their sinister plan to deport all of the minorities in the country. They have already laid the groundwork...convincing everyone that Trump and Republicans are racist (without providing any proof). Then it will be just a matter of time to execute their White supremacy plan of the great purge of the dirty, unwashed, heathen, non-Whites that roam freely in this country. I think my theory is more viable than your theory. Maybe we can get some other ridiculous scenarios so we can start a poll.
    • But that’s what Trump’s fanboys don’t understand.  When he talked about sexually assaulting women, y’all laughed it off as “locker room talk.”  When it was proven that he raped E. Jean Carroll, you cried that it was all an injustice… a lie. Even though he’d already confessed to doing the same thing to other women.  John McCain has suffered and sacrificed more for his country than practically anybody, except possible gold star families… and Trump called him a loser or something to that effect. “Oh, it was a joke that no one was supposed to take seriously.” But when Trump, after disrespecting the sacrifices of one of our most valiant, y’all are like “just because Trump didn’t go to Omaha Beach doesn’t mean he isn’t pro military!” Really? All you have to do is listen to what he said about McCain’s service. Not McCain as an opponent, not McCain’s political views… about the fact that the man was tortured, probably raped, and who knows what all else for over five years for swearing an oath and putting on the uniform.  But all of y’all supposedly “pro military” people just laughed along with Trump. “Good one, Sir! Maverick my new-hind! Filthy Rino!”  I don’t understand how the same people (y’all) who probably always say “thank you for your service” to any veteran still support a guy who craps on the ones who suffered the most on our behalf.  It’s baffling. 
    • Wow. Do you actually believe your little scenario has any chance of alleviating you of your moral immaturity? Deflection at it's best...or worse. You seem to be a sad case. If you died today, I would be remiss if not attributing your cause of death to severe TDS, and of course, Covid. Look at that. I just made a joke about your death. You did not get offended. Nobody was offended. Not one person will accuse me of being hateful towards fellow human beings. But yet, you hate Trump because he made a similar crude comment about McCain. You tried to attribute that comment as evidence Trump hates the military. What grade level of schoolchildren do you think is laughing at you for that "less that adolescent" (hint, hint) comment. You used one crude comment in an attempt to justify your TDS. Now, when called on it, you try to deflect the whole topic. You are certainly not having any fun with this, but you sure are providing entertainment for the board. It's a shame you can't join in on the fun. I think even Big Girl might be to the point of giggling at the shamelessness you are exhibiting.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...