Jump to content

Segregation Starting in France


Hagar

Recommended Posts

In 1972 Tom T. Hall wrote & sang, Old Dogs & Children, and Watermelon Wine.  Since I had such a beautiful singing voice (or not lol), I was singing it at work.  Hall's inspiration for the song came from a trip to the 72 Democratic Convention where he had a conversation with an old black porter at the Miami Beach hotel.  The Porter appraised his own life by saying the only three worthwhile things are the three listed in the songs title. An older black co-worker of mine was perturbed that Hall had mentioned an "old, gray, black gentleman.  His thoughts were, why didn't Hall just mention an old gray gentleman?  Why did people even mention race.  Keep in mind, my co-worker grew up during segregation, and had listened to Dr. King speaking, encouraging folks to look at someone & not see race, but a fellow human being.  A goal of most in the black movement at the time.

The point of my little story is, we seem to have come full circle.  Now we're seeing blacks giving segregation a rebirth, as evidenced by blacks repeatedly wanting segregated venues.  There have been several threads about those on here, and I'll admit my memory isn't what it use to be, but I don't remember any of our black posters condemning this trend.  If some of you did, my apologies.  If you didn't, is that what you want again, segregation?  In fairness, you'll have to acknowledge why it puzzles many whites, like myself.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Some whites would love segregation also. But houses for sale sometimes prevents this.

Don't be deflecting, No doubt some whites want segregation.  But why are many blacks now pushing for it, in public venues?  Have you seen any demands by white students/people for a segregated venue in a public facility?  I saw the struggles of the 60's.  Wouldn't want to see them again.  So seriously, do you have a clue why this is happening, or are you as clueless as me?  It's a head scratcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reb, don't expect a response to that question. I asked a fair question the other day wanting to know what the end goal was for all this segregation talk and I got no response. If those people on this board really cared about improving racial relations, they would want to engage in a dialogue. But no, they don't really care about that.  They just want to spew idiotic comments that further separate the races. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, texanabroad said:

Reb, don't expect a response to that question. I asked a fair question the other day wanting to know what the end goal was for all this segregation talk and I got no response. If those people on this board really cared about improving racial relations, they would want to engage in a dialogue. But no, they don't really care about that.  They just want to spew idiotic comments that further separate the races. 

It fits in with most liberals.  For some reason, when they know you're right, they bail out.  What irritates me, they don't take any wisdom with them.  If it doesn't fit their agenda, they block it out.  I can't comprehend it.  If you ever figure out how they blank out the truth, please let me know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...