Jump to content

Trump...a hypocrite?

Big girl

By Big girl
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

Yes, let's call out the hypocrites. Hypocrites are the ones that gave Hillary a pass on everything, now want to criticize Trump for seemingly similar behavior (in their biased hate-filled minds).

And this article sounds like it was written by a little whiney, immature 8th grader. His "proof" starts with the contention that Trump said Goldman Sachs controls Ted Cruz. The author then tries to say Trump is a hypocrite for appointing Wall Street employees. How is this supposed to be hypocritical? The Liberal hypocrites are the ones that complain about Wall Street being these subhuman predators not worthy of life, all the while begging them for campaign donations. Trump said that he thinks Goldman Sachs can control Ted. How does that disqualify everyone from Wall Street being appointed to his cabinet? I quit reading after that whopper.

Your continual picks of "newsworthy" sources just reinforces the already well-establish biased, uniformed, misinformed, hate-filled position you hold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted

Ever hear of these Goldman Sachs employees?  Lael Brainard, Gregory Craig, Thomas Donilon, William Dudley, Douglas Elmendorf, Rahm Emanuel, Stephen Friedman, Michael Frohman, Ann Fudge, Jason Furman, Mark Gallogly, TImohty Geithner, Gary Gensler, Michael Greenston, Neel Kashkari, Karen Kornbluh, Jakc Lew, David Lipton, EMil MIchael, ERic Mindich, PHilip Murphy, Mark Peterson, Steve Ratner, Robert Reischauer, Gene Sperling, yada yada yada-  They all were either part of the Obama Adminstration or advisors to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 12/26/2016 at 1:18 PM, stevenash said:

Ever hear of these Goldman Sachs employees?  Lael Brainard, Gregory Craig, Thomas Donilon, William Dudley, Douglas Elmendorf, Rahm Emanuel, Stephen Friedman, Michael Frohman, Ann Fudge, Jason Furman, Mark Gallogly, TImohty Geithner, Gary Gensler, Michael Greenston, Neel Kashkari, Karen Kornbluh, Jakc Lew, David Lipton, EMil MIchael, ERic Mindich, PHilip Murphy, Mark Peterson, Steve Ratner, Robert Reischauer, Gene Sperling, yada yada yada-  They all were either part of the Obama Adminstration or advisors to it.

So why was Trump talking bad about it if he knew he was going to do the same thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Big girl said:

He is a hypocrite and you guys are stupid, because you are defending him. How is he single handedly going to get rid of members of Congress to "drain the swamp" Do you think that the people appointed to his Cabinet care about the working class? Arent a majority of them millionaires?

Do you work for a poor person?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Big girl said:

He is a hypocrite and you guys are stupid, because you are defending him. How is he single handedly going to get rid of members of Congress to "drain the swamp" Do you think that the people appointed to his Cabinet care about the working class? Arent a majority of them millionaires?

Drain the swamp is a reference to getting rid of corrupt positions by administration insiders. 

It has nothing to do with Congress but rather presidential appointees. 

Good try though. Maybe someone else who also has no clue will go along with you thinking your statement is profound. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted

I never Googled "drain the swamp". I assumed it meant out with the old, in with the new, or out with the bad, in with the good.....referencing the quagmire that has become our federal government. Wasn't aware that it pertained only to the presidential appointees, especially since Republicans control everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Big girl said:

He is a hypocrite and you guys are stupid, because you are defending him. How is he single handedly going to get rid of members of Congress to "drain the swamp" Do you think that the people appointed to his Cabinet care about the working class? Arent a majority of them millionaires?

I agree with baddog:  BigGirl -- when's the last time you asked a poor person for a job?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Big girl said:

He is a hypocrite and you guys are stupid, because you are defending him. How is he single handedly going to get rid of members of Congress to "drain the swamp" Do you think that the people appointed to his Cabinet care about the working class? Arent a majority of them millionaires?

BigGirl, 10.7 million more use food stamps under obama.  And you complain about the successful people that Trump hires that actually know how to create jobs for these people?!  You know -- a pay check instead of a welfare check.  Looking at this, what's more compassionate, Trump's way or obama's way?

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I work for a corporation, not a person. Trump is in it for his gain.

The Clintons are in it for their gain. Being a politician has "earned" them millions upon millions of dollars.

And please explain how you think Trump is in it for his gain. You might be right. I would like to hear your rationale. (Another example of my foolish optimism.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I work for a corporation, not a person. Trump is in it for his gain.

A corporation with CEOs, presidents, VPs, a board of directors, general managers and such? I sure am glad they are not rich people. That would be a Cardinal sin in a capitalistic society. One person can indeed own a corporation. Lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • BBfan061
      2024 Countdown to Kickoff

      By BBfan061 · Posted

      Tic tock 
    • Separation Scientist
      Dang "Erectionists"!

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      To clarify, Dems love wars. They rage daily in the bluest of blue inner citicis. Chicago had 39 shootings over the weekend, 9 dead. Warzone. Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, etc. I am sure was just as bloody. The blue body count rises daily. I am sure the blue defunding of police and releasing murders without any bail have nothing to do with it. Right?   
    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...