Jump to content

BH Vs. Porter

BHFAN

By BHFAN
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

BHFAN

BHFAN

Posted
Posted

Ok this game only serves as a tune up for both teams as they enter the playoffs next week, but I am hoping to see a much more focused BH team in this game. The last two games BH has had rough starts and even at some points seemed confused on the field! The game against Humble I wrote it off as being Homecoming, but then came the NC game! Hopefully the week off will get these Eagles focused again because PNG will be waiting next week! I predict the Eagles come out focused and beat Porter by 2 TD's!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedRover22

RedRover22

Posted
Posted

If they follow New Caney's game plan it will be easy for them. Double #2 for Porter and they are dead on offense. Porter has no run game and a little pressure on their QB kills them. He was sacked about 12 times and most of those weren't even blitz sacks. It is pretty obvious that Porter's QB isn't a run threat, and other receivers won't beat you. If you can run the ball well, you can score enough to win. New Caney staff did a tremendous job of having a simple game plan, and Porter didn't have an answer. They beat Crosby and Dayton by throwing to that other tall receiver, but I didn't see him Friday night against New Caney. Heard he got in trouble, Porter was much better when they had both those tall guys. I'll say BH by 17. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cougar14.2

Cougar14.2

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, RedRover22 said:

If they follow New Caney's game plan it will be easy for them. Double #2 for Porter and they are dead on offense. Porter has no run game and a little pressure on their QB kills them. He was sacked about 12 times and most of those weren't even blitz sacks. It is pretty obvious that Porter's QB isn't a run threat, and other receivers won't beat you. If you can run the ball well, you can score enough to win. New Caney staff did a tremendous job of having a simple game plan, and Porter didn't have an answer. They beat Crosby and Dayton by throwing to that other tall receiver, but I didn't see him Friday night against New Caney. Heard he got in trouble, Porter was much better when they had both those tall guys. I'll say BH by 17. 

Porter beat Crosby and Dayton throwing the ball to #2 Carney. He had 17 catches for 445 yards and 5 tds combined in those two games. He played against New Caney, #6 is the one that didn't. I never though Porter was very good because their makeup was so fragile, they have to throw the ball down the field at a high completion percentage to be effective. They can't run the ball and their defense isn't very good, reminds me a lot of Holley's Kingwood Park teams that were good with Henderson but would get blown out with just one player missing.

I agree with everything else you said though, I think BH blows Porter out. Especially if the kid opposite Carney doesn't play again this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cat001

cat001

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Porter beat Crosby and Dayton throwing the ball to #2 Carney. He had 17 catches for 445 yards and 5 tds combined in those two games. He played against New Caney, #6 is the one that didn't. I never though Porter was very good because their makeup was so fragile, they have to throw the ball down the field at a high completion percentage to be effective. They can't run the ball and their defense isn't very good, reminds me a lot of Holley's Kingwood Park teams that were good with Henderson but would get blown out with just one player missing.

I agree with everything else you said though, I think BH blows Porter out. Especially if the kid opposite Carney doesn't play again this week.

The defense is good enough to hold Crosby, Humble, and NC to their lowest point totals on the season. Their defense is actually pretty good. I think BH struggles with athletic secondaries which with the exception of 10 from BH none of their other WRs are going to stretch the field. NC took away 10 from BH and they did very little on offense. So just as you say take away 2 from Porter, if you take away 10 from BH and they struggle offensively. Should be a good game I don't see either team winning by more than a score. It will definitely not be a blow out as you are predicting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cougar14.2

Cougar14.2

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, cat001 said:

The defense is good enough to hold Crosby, Humble, and NC to their lowest point totals on the season. Their defense is actually pretty good. I think BH struggles with athletic secondaries which with the exception of 10 from BH none of their other WRs are going to stretch the field. NC took away 10 from BH and they did very little on offense. So just as you say take away 2 from Porter, if you take away 10 from BH and they struggle offensively. Should be a good game I don't see either team winning by more than a score. It will definitely not be a blow out as you are predicting.

Crosby scored 34 points on Porter with backups. KP held Crosby to 26, Manvel held Crosby to 21 and Houston Heights held Crosby to 25. Porter's defense gave up 34 to Crosby, 42 to Dayton but I guess you can say "held" New Caney to 28. BH will probably put another 35+ on Porter this weekend. Porter is also giving up that many point playing slow and trying to shorten the game. If you think their defense is actually pretty good, you're probably one of the ones wondering if Porter was the best team in the state before New Caney crushed them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lightning/Eagle

Lightning/Eagle

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, TradenupBH said:

Hopefully  both teams will be up for this game. Both are already in playoffs and can't help themselves for seeding purposes. I have a feeling backups will get reps in this game to try and stay healthy for next week.

Agree to a certain extent but neither team wants to go into the playoffs on a two game losing streak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eagles12

Eagles12

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Crosby scored 34 points on Porter with backups. KP held Crosby to 26, Manvel held Crosby to 21 and Houston Heights held Crosby to 25. Porter's defense gave up 34 to Crosby, 42 to Dayton but I guess you can say "held" New Caney to 28. BH will probably put another 35+ on Porter this weekend. Porter is also giving up that many point playing slow and trying to shorten the game. If you think their defense is actually pretty good, you're probably one of the ones wondering if Porter was the best team in the state before New Caney crushed them.  

Hmm all their backups played I thought it was only 3 or 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
easttexiasbias

easttexiasbias

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, BHMOMFORLIFE said:

Idk what Ol Westerburg will do about this game. He's already made a few changes this year that some are not to happy about. I would love to see our seniors boys have 1 last good game in the Eagle stadium. I know our boys are going to come out and play strong on their home field

What changes are people not happy about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BHMOMFORLIFE

BHMOMFORLIFE

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, RedRover22 said:

Seriously???? Not happy about? They should be ecstatic about everything that is going on. Talk about a hard bunch to please. OMG! I got an idea, go see if you can talk him into running the flexbone this week. Maybe that will make those other changes he made seem a little underwhelming. 

Calm down there, no one said it was about "playing the game" On the field has been great this season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    hinab
    Newest Member
    hinab
    Joined


  • Posts

    • CardinalBacker
      More voting fraud! Guess who?

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • BS Wildcats
      End of an Era: Boy Scouts of America Officially Changes Name to Embrace Inclusivity After 114 Years!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      See Aunt Jemima syrup and Uncle Ben’s rice
    • Reagan
      More voting fraud! Guess who?

      By Reagan · Posted

      The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
    • Mr. Thornton Melon
      Multi-Sport Athletes

      By Mr. Thornton Melon · Posted

      *** Moved to High School Baseball Forum***
    • Englebert
      More voting fraud! Guess who?

      By Englebert · Posted

      You just analogized to a tee the situation going on with the Trump New York trial. And I bet you can't even see the hypocrisy elicited out of your hatred. You once again outed yourself...without any realization of your actions. I'm not sure if Reagan actually set you up to expose your blatant hypocrisy, or if it was just a happy coincidence. You seem to thrive on humiliating yourself. Now get to work on providing that evidence of your emphatic declarations that Trump's economy was horrible. You failed miserably before, I bet you will again.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...