Jump to content

Porter

Members
  • Posts

    1,530
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Everything posted by Porter

  1. I am not a big Jon Stewart fan but this is Funny!😂
  2. My narrative is America First. You should be a American.
  3. Guess this is the best Trump could get since everyone is bailing on him. Lol
  4. Good stuff, lol
  5. I couldn’t help it.
  6. According to your buddy Baddog’s standards Counterfeit Cash is a Garbage Site. according to Grok on X. 🤣😂 You sir are fake news according to Baddog!🤣 No, @JCDeardeuff (Counterfeit Kash) is not a reliable information source. @jcdeardeuff Key details: • Small account: ~8,800 followers, blue verified (paid), low engagement on recent posts (often <10-50 likes/views in the dozens). @jcdeardeuff • Content style: Mostly opinionated commentary, replies, memes, and political sniping (e.g., criticizing figures like Rand Paul as a “RINO scumbag,” referencing “Platnermania,” or quick takes on news). It aligns with right-leaning/conspiracy-adjacent circles but offers no evident original reporting, sourcing, or expertise. @jcdeardeuff • Username/bio: “Counterfeit Kash” appears to be a jab at Kash Patel (often called “Counterfeit Kash” in some critical contexts). The bio (“Joseph Alan Holmes was RIGHT!”) references an obscure individual, not indicating journalistic credentials. wilsonfuneralhome.com Why not reliable? • No track record of expertise or verification: Nothing suggests professional journalism, insider access, fact-checking processes, or corrections policy. It’s a typical partisan X account amplifying views. • Social media nature: X (Twitter) posts are unfiltered opinions. Even verified or popular accounts frequently spread unverified claims, and this one has minimal reach/impact. • Context: Searches turn up no major citations as a credible outlet. It’s not affiliated with established media, think tanks, or known analysts. For reliable info, stick to primary sources (official documents, data), established outlets with editorial standards, or subject-matter experts with transparent methodologies. Cross-check claims here against those. This account can be entertaining for like-minded commentary but shouldn’t be treated as authoritative.
  7. We know, yall are so in tune to reality. 😐
  8. I understood it as hyperbole but I think Reagan and Baddog has taken it serious. Lol
  9. The Golden Era is here! 👏👏👏
  10. Actually the individual was commenting on this post if you read the whole post. I guess they’re not reliable too. Lol
  11. If you’re talking to me please let me know what the question is, I’d be glad to answer it for you.
  12. You obviously have no clue how x works. Acceptable sites like the mainstream media? Lol You’re clueless about how X works. You always attack the messenger instead of the message because you don’t like anything that makes your daddy Trump look bad. lol It has nothing to do with squirrels and nuts, I am just not blinded by the color orange.
  13. You may want to check your facts checker. Lol Grok says - Pam Bondi appeared yesterday, May 29th,No, she wasn’t required to testify under before the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door transcribed interview about the DOJ’s handling and release of the Epstein files—not a formal sworn deposition. The committee had subpoenaed her earlier for a deposition under oath, but after she was ousted as AG, Chairman Comer downgraded it to a voluntary transcribed interview. That means she could decline certain questions—like ones about Trump—and wasn’t bound by oath. Democrats and Epstein survivors called it a cover-up or sham, demanding she testify publicly under oath instead. She admitted some redaction errors but shifted blame to others like Todd Blanche and the FBI. The transcript will likely be released, but it lacks the legal weight of sworn testimony. Whether she’ll face a real subpoena for sworn testimony in the future depends on the committee—Democrats are pushing for it, but it’s not guaranteed. This setup let her appear cooperative without full accountability.
  14. So what you’re saying is you are still waiting for Bondi to release the Epstein Binder 2? Did you fact check the fact checker?
  15. Hope you’re wrong but reports are saying different.
  16. So your saying Trump is not coughing up $300 billion to Iran for reconstruction?
  17. Again take the hook out of your mouth. Lol
  18. Take the hook out of your mouth.
  19. Can’t wait for you to spend this! 😂 Winning!!! ……Embarrassing
×
×
  • Create New...