BC87
-
Posts
127 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
BC87 got a reaction from rhino1877 in Hamshire-Fannett 7 Bridge City 3/FINAL
Player was not on home plate. That was not the call. The call was for being completely out of batters box, which is an impossibility without being on the plate.
The umpires in this area have no clue to what the rule is.
-
BC87 got a reaction from Critter in Hamshire-Fannett 7 Bridge City 3/FINAL
Player was not on home plate. That was not the call. The call was for being completely out of batters box, which is an impossibility without being on the plate.
The umpires in this area have no clue to what the rule is.
-
BC87 got a reaction from kicker in West Orange-Stark 3 Bridge City 2/FINAL
It was 2-2 count and it was a swing, damn near full swing, which should have been the third out in the inning with the throw down to first. Umpire in the field should have seen it, even from his location, it was so obvious. However, the supposed SEC umpire behind the plate, didn't advance the count to 3-2, so the next 2 balls made this at bat a 5 ball walk.
Jack threw a hell of a game. No doubt about that.